Market Cap: $3.2672T -0.710%
Volume(24h): $102.3379B -6.020%
  • Market Cap: $3.2672T -0.710%
  • Volume(24h): $102.3379B -6.020%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.2672T -0.710%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$107295.810621 USD

-0.60%

ethereum
ethereum

$2438.191256 USD

-2.24%

tether
tether

$1.000355 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.107400 USD

-4.14%

bnb
bnb

$645.196047 USD

-0.58%

solana
solana

$140.861296 USD

-3.48%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999977 USD

0.05%

tron
tron

$0.271724 USD

-0.74%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.162450 USD

-2.18%

cardano
cardano

$0.559765 USD

-2.72%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$36.577660 USD

-2.60%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$491.980353 USD

1.63%

sui
sui

$2.645087 USD

-4.57%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.061914 USD

-2.28%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.014317 USD

0.12%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Token Crash, Misappropriation, and Protocol Peril: The Across Protocol Debacle

Jun 27, 2025 at 07:06 pm

Across Protocol faces allegations of misappropriating $23M in DAO funds, sparking a token crash and raising concerns about protocol governance.

Token Crash, Misappropriation, and Protocol Peril: The Across Protocol Debacle

The crypto world is buzzing about the latest drama: Across Protocol, a cross-chain bridge, is facing accusations of some seriously shady behavior. We're talking token crash, misappropriation, and questions swirling around their whole protocol. Let's dive in.

Across Protocol Under Fire: A $23 Million Misappropriation?

The core of the issue? Allegations that the Across Protocol team siphoned off approximately $23 million from their Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) treasury. The claim, made public by Ogle on June 27th, centers on accusations that the team manipulated governance votes to transfer funds to Risk Labs, a private company linked to the same team behind Across Protocol.

Ogle's analysis suggests the co-founders and insiders allegedly bypassed the DAO's democratic process to extract 150 million ACX tokens, valued at $23 million, under the guise of “strategic investment” and “retroactive funding.” Think of it as a secret heist, but instead of masks and crowbars, it's all done with blockchain and governance proposals.

Secret Wallets and Coordinated Voting: The Nitty-Gritty

The controversy revolves around two governance proposals. One proposal in October 2023 requested 100 million ACX tokens for Risk Labs, presented as a strategic move. However, blockchain sleuthing allegedly revealed coordinated insider voting. Kevin Chan, publicly submitting the proposal, supposedly cast a massive “yes” vote from a separate wallet linked to him. Other team members allegedly used multiple secret wallets to push the proposals through. A second proposal for “retroactive funding” saw similar voting patterns.

Denials and Damage Control: What's the Protocol Saying?

Hart Lambur, Across Protocol CEO, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, calling the allegations “categorically untrue.” He insists the team has not “extracted” value from the DAO. Despite these claims, the accusations have resonated throughout the crypto community, with some figures thanking Ogle for exposing potential issues with DAO governance.

Market Impact: The ACX Token Takes a Hit

Unsurprisingly, the allegations have taken a toll on ACX token holders. The token plummeted on the news, losing a significant chunk of its value. It's a harsh reminder that trust is paramount in the decentralized world, and any hint of impropriety can send prices tumbling.

Is This a New Trend?

Sadly, this situation mirrors other recent incidents. The OM token of the MANTRA blockchain project experienced a similar crash following allegations of insider misconduct. It begs the question: Is this a growing trend? Are DAOs as secure and transparent as we believe, or are they vulnerable to manipulation from within?

My Two Sats

While Hart Lambur has refuted the allegations of the token crash, misappropriation, and protocol issues, the on-chain evidence provided by Ogle suggests that a deeper investigation may be necessary to resolve the situation. As blockchain technology advances, the ability to track suspicious transactions becomes increasingly easy to detect and harder to cover up. This is not to say that Hart Lambur or his team are guilty of anything, but to provide a clear record, a third-party audit may be necessary.

The Takeaway

The Across Protocol situation serves as a cautionary tale. It highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and robust governance within DAOs. It also underscores the potential risks associated with investing in projects where trust is compromised. The ACX token crash is a painful lesson for investors, and a stark reminder that even in the decentralized world, human nature can throw a wrench in the works.

So, what's the moral of the story? Stay vigilant, do your research, and remember: in the wild west of crypto, sometimes the cowboys are the ones you need to watch out for. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to check my own token holdings... just in case!

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jun 28, 2025