令牌崩溃，盗用和协议危险：跨协议崩溃

整个协议都面临指控，指控挪用了2300万美元的DAO资金，引发了令牌崩溃并引起了对协议治理的担忧。

The crypto world is buzzing about the latest drama: Across Protocol, a cross-chain bridge, is facing accusations of some seriously shady behavior. We're talking token crash, misappropriation, and questions swirling around their whole protocol. Let's dive in.

加密世界对最新戏剧的嗡嗡作响：跨链桥跨协议正面临着一些严重的阴暗行为的指控。我们正在谈论代币崩溃，盗用和围绕其整个协议旋转的问题。让我们潜水。

Across Protocol Under Fire: A $23 Million Misappropriation?

在《纵火范围》中，涉及2300万美元的盗用？

The core of the issue? Allegations that the Across Protocol team siphoned off approximately $23 million from their Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) treasury. The claim, made public by Ogle on June 27th, centers on accusations that the team manipulated governance votes to transfer funds to Risk Labs, a private company linked to the same team behind Across Protocol.

问题的核心？指控跨协议团队从其分散的自治组织（DAO）财政部撤销了约2300万美元。该索赔于6月27日由Ogle公开，以指控为中心，该指控是该团队操纵治理投票将资金转移到风险实验室的指控，这是一家私人公司，该公司与同一团队跨越协议有关。

Ogle's analysis suggests the co-founders and insiders allegedly bypassed the DAO's democratic process to extract 150 million ACX tokens, valued at $23 million, under the guise of “strategic investment” and “retroactive funding.” Think of it as a secret heist, but instead of masks and crowbars, it's all done with blockchain and governance proposals.

Ogle的分析表明，据称联合创始人和内部人士以“战略投资”和“追溯资金”为幌子，绕过了DAO的民主进程，以提取1.5亿ACX代币，价值2300万美元。将其视为一个秘密的抢劫案，但不是面具和撬棍，而是用区块链和治理建议完成的。

Secret Wallets and Coordinated Voting: The Nitty-Gritty

秘密钱包和协调的投票：挑剔

The controversy revolves around two governance proposals. One proposal in October 2023 requested 100 million ACX tokens for Risk Labs, presented as a strategic move. However, blockchain sleuthing allegedly revealed coordinated insider voting. Kevin Chan, publicly submitting the proposal, supposedly cast a massive “yes” vote from a separate wallet linked to him. Other team members allegedly used multiple secret wallets to push the proposals through. A second proposal for “retroactive funding” saw similar voting patterns.

争议围绕两个治理提案。 2023年10月，一项提案要求有1亿个ACX令牌对风险实验室，这是战略性举措。但是，据称，区块链侦查揭示了协调的内幕投票。凯文·陈（Kevin Chan）公开提交提案，据说从与他相关的单独钱包中投票了。据称，其他团队成员使用多个秘密钱包来推动提案。关于“追溯资金”的第二个提案看到了类似的投票模式。

Denials and Damage Control: What's the Protocol Saying?

拒绝和损害控制：协议在说什么？

Hart Lambur, Across Protocol CEO, has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, calling the allegations “categorically untrue.” He insists the team has not “extracted” value from the DAO. Despite these claims, the accusations have resonated throughout the crypto community, with some figures thanking Ogle for exposing potential issues with DAO governance.

跨协议首席执行官的哈特·兰伯尔（Hart Lambur）强烈否认任何不当行为，称这些指控“绝对不正确”。他坚持说，团队没有从DAO中“提取”价值。尽管有这些主张，但这些指控在整个加密货币社区中引起了共鸣，一些数字感谢Ogle揭露了DAO治理的潜在问题。

Market Impact: The ACX Token Takes a Hit

市场影响：ACX令牌受到了打击

Unsurprisingly, the allegations have taken a toll on ACX token holders. The token plummeted on the news, losing a significant chunk of its value. It's a harsh reminder that trust is paramount in the decentralized world, and any hint of impropriety can send prices tumbling.

毫不奇怪，这些指控对ACX代币持有人造成了损失。象征性的消息暴跌，失去了其价值的很大一部分。这是一个苛刻的提醒，即信任在分散世界中至关重要，任何不当行为的暗示都可以使价格下跌。

Is This a New Trend?

这是一个新趋势吗？

Sadly, this situation mirrors other recent incidents. The OM token of the MANTRA blockchain project experienced a similar crash following allegations of insider misconduct. It begs the question: Is this a growing trend? Are DAOs as secure and transparent as we believe, or are they vulnerable to manipulation from within?

可悲的是，这种情况反映了其他最近的事件。在指控内幕不当行为的指控之后，咒语区块链项目的OM令牌发生了类似的崩溃。它引出了一个问题：这是一个增长的趋势吗？ Daos是否像我们相信的那样安全和透明，还是容易受到内部操纵的影响？

My Two Sats

我的两个坐着

While Hart Lambur has refuted the allegations of the token crash, misappropriation, and protocol issues, the on-chain evidence provided by Ogle suggests that a deeper investigation may be necessary to resolve the situation. As blockchain technology advances, the ability to track suspicious transactions becomes increasingly easy to detect and harder to cover up. This is not to say that Hart Lambur or his team are guilty of anything, but to provide a clear record, a third-party audit may be necessary.

尽管哈特·兰伯尔（Hart Lambur）驳斥了令牌崩溃，盗用和协议问题的指控，但Ogle提供的链上证据表明，解决情况可能需要进行更深入的调查。随着区块链技术的进步，追踪可疑交易的能力变得越来越容易被检测到更难掩盖。这并不是说哈特·兰伯尔（Hart Lambur）或他的团队对任何事情有罪，而是要提供明确的记录，可能需要进行第三方审核。

The Takeaway

外卖

The Across Protocol situation serves as a cautionary tale. It highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and robust governance within DAOs. It also underscores the potential risks associated with investing in projects where trust is compromised. The ACX token crash is a painful lesson for investors, and a stark reminder that even in the decentralized world, human nature can throw a wrench in the works.

跨协议情况是一个警示性的故事。它突出了道斯内部透明，问责制和稳健治理的重要性。它还强调了与在信任受到损害的项目中的投资相关的潜在风险。对于投资者而言，ACX令牌崩溃是一个痛苦的教训，并提醒人们，即使在分散的世界中，人性也可以在工程中扔扳手。

So, what's the moral of the story? Stay vigilant, do your research, and remember: in the wild west of crypto, sometimes the cowboys are the ones you need to watch out for. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to check my own token holdings... just in case!

那么，这个故事的寓意是什么？保持警惕，进行研究，并记住：在加密货币的野外，有时牛仔是您需要注意的牛仔。现在，如果您能原谅我，我要去检查自己的令牌控股……以防万一！