Market Cap: $2.2043T 0.58%
Volume(24h): $56.8553B 3.76%
  • Market Cap: $2.2043T 0.58%
  • Volume(24h): $56.8553B 3.76%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.2043T 0.58%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

SEC Dispute Ripple Ruling's Precedent, Casting Doubt on Coinbase Appeal

May 11, 2024 at 08:01 pm

Amidst a legal battle between Coinbase and the SEC, the SEC has questioned the broader influence of Ripple's favorable ruling in July 2023, which deemed XRP sales through exchanges as non-securities offerings. The SEC's argument against Coinbase's appeal asserts that no other court has endorsed this ruling, implying that Ripple's victory may stand as an isolated event within the industry.

SEC Dispute Ripple Ruling's Precedent, Casting Doubt on Coinbase Appeal

SEC Questions Ripple Ruling's Precedential Value, Clouds Coinbase Appeal

Washington, D.C. - The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has cast doubt on the legal significance and influence of a recent favorable ruling in the Ripple lawsuit, arguing that it holds no sway in other cases, potentially complicating Coinbase's appeal attempt.

In a July 2023 decision, Judge Analisa Torres ruled that Ripple's programmatic sales of XRP tokens through exchanges did not constitute securities offerings, effectively affirming that XRP is not a security and that token sales on exchanges do not qualify as investment contracts.

However, in a recent legal filing related to Coinbase's appeal, the SEC asserted that "no court has followed the [Ripple] ruling," implying that other courts have not embraced the legal reasoning or precedent established in the case.

This statement suggests that the SEC views the Ripple decision as an outlier, lacking in legal influence or validity. It also hints at the possibility that the SEC may not consider the Ripple ruling binding in other cases, including its own lawsuit against Coinbase.

The SEC's argument stems from its belief that the digital assets listed on Coinbase's platform are securities, and that sales through the platform constitute investment contracts. This view directly conflicts with Judge Torres's ruling that tokens like XRP sold on exchanges are not securities.

Legal experts have weighed in on the implications of the SEC's stance. Bill Morgan, a pro-XRP lawyer, has suggested that if other courts do not adopt the Ripple ruling and the SEC prevails in its other major crypto lawsuits, Ripple's victory regarding programmatic sales would stand in isolation.

"Yes if no court follows SEC v Ripple and the SEC wins all these other big crypto cases but the SEC does not appeal or does not succeed in an appeal against Ripple then programmatic sales by Ripple will stand alone as not needing to be registered," Morgan tweeted.

This would mean that Ripple could continue its programmatic sales unregistered, but the ruling may not necessarily serve as a legal precedent for other entities in the crypto industry.

The SEC's questioning of the Ripple ruling's precedential value has cast a shadow over Coinbase's appeal attempt. Coinbase has argued that the SEC's lawsuit against it is "based on an overbroad and erroneous interpretation of the law," and that the SEC's attempt to apply securities laws to digital assets is "unconstitutional."

The SEC's latest filing adds another layer of complexity to the Coinbase case, and it remains to be seen how the court will ultimately rule. The outcome of the Coinbase appeal could have far-reaching implications for the crypto industry, as it could help clarify the regulatory landscape and provide guidance on the classification of digital assets.

The SEC's position raises concerns about the consistency and predictability of the legal framework surrounding cryptocurrencies. The agency's assertion that the Ripple ruling holds no weight for other cases suggests that it may be willing to take a case-by-case approach to regulating digital assets, rather than establishing clear and consistent rules.

This approach creates uncertainty and challenges for businesses operating in the crypto space. Without clear regulatory guidelines, companies may face difficulties in developing and implementing compliant products and services.

Furthermore, the SEC's stance could undermine the legitimacy of the crypto industry in the eyes of investors and the general public. If different courts reach different conclusions on the legal status of digital assets, it could create confusion and erode trust in the market.

The Ripple lawsuit and the Coinbase appeal are closely watched cases that will likely shape the future of crypto regulation. The outcome of these cases will have significant implications for businesses, investors, and the entire crypto ecosystem.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Aug 09, 2026