The correct word is corruption

When the media points out Trump’s “potential conflicts of interest,” as it has in recent days when describing Trump’s growing crypto enterprise, it doesn't come close to telling the public what's really going on — unprecedented paybacks and self-dealing by the president of the United States, using his office to make billions.

The article highlights the concern over the media's use of the term "potential conflicts of interest" in discussing Trump's ventures.

It argues that while some legal scholars reserve the term 'corruption' for matters ruled upon by a court, the common-sense and critical definition is broader.

The article criticizes the lack of urgency in mobilizing public opinion against Trump's actions, which it sees as an urgent matter.

It's also noted that the article mentions Trump's family earning an estimated $2.9 billion from his crypto endeavors in the last six months, and a new report estimates the family's wealth has increased by $2.9 billion in the last six months.

The article further claims that Trump's actions, such as collecting on a favor or engaging in a quid pro quo deal for himself or his family, which he's reportedly doing more and more often, are transactions that can be defined as corrupt.

The article concludes by stating that some legal scholars say "corruption" occurs only after a court so rules. But this isn't the common-sense definition, and the critical venue for restraining Trump is the court of public opinion.

When Trump collects on a favor or engages in a quid pro quo deal for himself or his family — which he's doing more and more often — the transactions are corrupt.