Market Cap: $3.3646T 0.850%
Volume(24h): $107.4504B -22.260%
  • Market Cap: $3.3646T 0.850%
  • Volume(24h): $107.4504B -22.260%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.3646T 0.850%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$106900.362344 USD

0.81%

ethereum
ethereum

$2539.350639 USD

-0.90%

tether
tether

$1.000181 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.355654 USD

-1.42%

bnb
bnb

$651.274881 USD

0.03%

solana
solana

$168.837259 USD

-1.00%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999858 USD

-0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.228762 USD

0.62%

cardano
cardano

$0.745002 USD

-0.36%

tron
tron

$0.269741 USD

0.78%

sui
sui

$3.835781 USD

-0.99%

chainlink
chainlink

$15.762179 USD

-2.73%

avalanche
avalanche

$22.438476 USD

-0.40%

stellar
stellar

$0.287075 USD

-0.30%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$26.277397 USD

-2.29%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Bancor Sues Uniswap Over Key DEX Patent Claims

May 21, 2025 at 05:11 am

Bancor's developers have launched a legal battle against Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation.

Bancor Sues Uniswap Over Key DEX Patent Claims

A lawsuit has been launched by Bancor’s developers against Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation.

The lawsuit, which was filed on Monday by Bprotocol Foundation and LocalCoin Ltd. — the nonprofit and original developer of Bancor — in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accuses Uniswap of using Bancor’s patented decentralized exchange technology without acquiring the necessary licenses.

At the heart of the dispute lies the constant product automated market maker (CPAMM) model, which Bancor claims to have invented and obtained U.S. patents for in 2017. This model facilitates permissionless crypto trading through smart contracts, a crucial aspect of decentralized finance (DeFi).

According to Bancor’s complaint, Uniswap’s own protocol, launched in 2018, utilized the same CPAMM structure that Bancor developed and patented. However, Uniswap allegedly deployed this design without securing a license for the technology from Bancor.

As a result of deploying that technology, Uniswap allegedly “profited greatly,” while Bancor claims it never received any compensation for the use of its invention.

If the court decides in favor of Bancor, this case could have significant implications for how intellectual property rights are viewed in the context of open-source blockchain protocols, and it could also raise questions about the ownership of innovation in the DeFi space.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on May 21, 2025