Market Cap: $2.8389T -0.70%
Volume(24h): $167.3711B 6.46%
Fear & Greed Index:

28 - Fear

  • Market Cap: $2.8389T -0.70%
  • Volume(24h): $167.3711B 6.46%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.8389T -0.70%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

What is a PPLNS vs. a PPS payment system? How to choose the best pool payout scheme?

PPLNS rewards miners based on shares in a rolling window before a block is found—favoring consistency but increasing payout variance—while PPS guarantees fixed, immediate payouts at higher fees.

Dec 26, 2025 at 09:39 pm

Understanding PPLNS Mechanics

1. PPLNS stands for Pay Per Last N Shares and operates by rewarding miners based on the number of valid shares submitted within a rolling window preceding a block discovery.

2. The system does not pay out immediately after each share but waits until a block is found, then calculates rewards using only those shares submitted in the last N shares before the block was solved.

3. This method inherently aligns miner incentives with pool longevity since consistent participation increases the likelihood of being included in the reward window.

4. Variability in payouts is higher under PPLNS because miners may submit many shares without seeing returns if no block is found during their inclusion window.

5. Pool operators often set N as a multiple of the average network difficulty to stabilize variance while preserving fairness across active contributors.

How PPS Differs Fundamentally

1. PPS, or Pay Per Share, guarantees a fixed payout for every valid share submitted regardless of whether the pool finds a block.

2. The pool operator assumes all block reward risk and covers payments from its own reserves or fee income, making it a capital-intensive model.

3. Miners receive immediate and predictable compensation, which eliminates short-term variance entirely.

4. Because the pool bears full risk, PPS schemes typically charge higher fees—often 3% to 5%—to offset potential losses from orphaned or stale blocks.

5. This model favors low-latency, high-stability mining setups where uptime and connection reliability are consistently maintained.

Fee Structures and Hidden Costs

1. PPLNS pools commonly apply lower nominal fees—between 0.5% and 2%—but the effective cost depends on how tightly N is calibrated against difficulty fluctuations.

2. Some PPLNS implementations use dynamic N values that shift with hash rate changes, leading to inconsistent exposure windows across time periods.

3. PPS pools may advertise flat fees but embed additional costs through reduced base rates per share, effectively lowering the gross payout beneath market benchmarks.

4. Transaction fee distribution policies also vary: certain PPLNS pools allocate miner shares of transaction fees proportionally to their contribution in the N-window, while others exclude them entirely.

5. Pool downtime directly impacts PPLNS more severely than PPS since missed shares reduce inclusion probability in future reward windows, whereas PPS compensates for uptime gaps via guaranteed rates.

Network Conditions and Miner Behavior

1. In periods of rapid difficulty adjustment, PPLNS can disproportionately benefit long-term participants who maintain steady hash rate contributions across cycles.

2. Miners frequently switching pools suffer under PPLNS due to frequent resets of their share history, reducing eligibility for upcoming rewards.

3. High-latency connections lead to increased stale share rates, which are usually excluded from PPLNS calculations—making stable infrastructure critical.

4. PPS mitigates latency penalties by paying for every accepted share, even if delayed, provided it arrives before the pool rejects it as stale.

5. Large-scale operations often combine both models across different coins or algorithms, allocating resources based on volatility profiles and operational overhead tolerance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does PPLNS always yield higher long-term earnings than PPS?Not necessarily. Historical data shows PPLNS tends to outperform PPS only when miner uptime exceeds 92% and pool luck remains near expected averages over extended durations.

Q: Can a pool switch between PPLNS and PPS without notifying users?Legitimate pools must disclose any change in payout methodology prior to implementation; failure to do so violates standard pool governance expectations outlined in most Terms of Service agreements.

Q: Are there hybrid models combining PPLNS and PPS features?Yes. Some pools offer PPLNS-PPS hybrids where a base PPS rate covers immediate share value and an additional PPLNS bonus layer rewards sustained participation.

Q: How do orphaned blocks affect PPLNS payouts?Orphaned blocks are excluded from PPLNS calculations entirely—no rewards are distributed for them, and the associated N-window remains unchanged unless a valid block is confirmed.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct