Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
Fear & Greed Index:

38 - Fear

  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
  • Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

What is the difference between coin-margined and USDT-margined futures?

Coin-margined futures use the underlying crypto (e.g., BTC) for margin and PnL, exposing traders directly to asset volatility, while USDT-margined contracts simplify risk with stablecoin-based accounting and linear margin mechanics.

Dec 25, 2025 at 06:19 am

Coin-Margined Futures Explained

1. Coin-margined futures contracts use the underlying cryptocurrency as both the base asset and the margin collateral. For example, a BTC/USD perpetual contract denominated in Bitcoin requires BTC to open and maintain positions.

2. Profit and loss calculations are expressed in the coin itself, meaning gains or losses directly affect the trader’s BTC balance rather than a stablecoin balance.

3. Liquidation levels depend on the price of the underlying asset relative to the margin held, making volatility exposure more direct and asymmetric during sharp moves.

4. Funding rates are paid or received in the base coin, adding another layer of exposure when holding long or short positions over extended periods.

5. These contracts are historically older and remain widely used on exchanges like BitMEX (pre-2023) and Bybit’s legacy BTCUSD pairs.

USDT-Margined Futures Overview

1. USDT-margined futures use Tether as the sole settlement and margin currency, regardless of the underlying pair. A BTC/USDT contract is margined and settled entirely in USDT.

2. All PnL, maintenance margin, and liquidation thresholds are calculated in USDT terms, simplifying risk assessment for traders focused on fiat-equivalent value.

3. This structure decouples margin health from the volatility of the base asset — a sudden 30% drop in BTC price does not reduce the nominal USDT value of the margin deposit.

4. Funding payments occur in USDT, eliminating reinvestment friction or compounding effects tied to fluctuating coin balances.

5. Most major exchanges including Binance, OKX, and Bybit now prioritize USDT-margined offerings due to their intuitive accounting and broader retail accessibility.

Risk Profile Comparison

1. In coin-margined setups, a rising BTC price increases the USD value of margin but also raises the notional size of the position, potentially accelerating liquidation if leverage remains constant.

2. USDT-margined positions isolate margin value from base asset price swings, offering linear exposure where only mark price deviation triggers margin calls.

3. Coin-margined contracts expose traders to “margin erosion” during strong rallies: unrealized PnL in BTC may inflate equity, yet insufficient BTC holdings can still trigger liquidation if price reverses rapidly.

4. USDT-margined accounts avoid this dynamic; equity stays stable in stablecoin terms unless marked-to-market losses breach maintenance requirements.

5. Cross-margin modes behave differently across models — coin-margined cross-margin pulls from the same coin wallet, while USDT-margined cross-margin aggregates all USDT-denominated assets including stablecoin deposits and realized PnL.

Liquidity and Market Structure

1. Coin-margined order books often exhibit deeper liquidity for high-capitalization pairs like BTCUSD due to institutional participation and hedging activity tied to spot BTC reserves.

2. USDT-margined markets show higher turnover among retail traders, reflected in tighter bid-ask spreads on mid-tier altcoin pairs such as SOL/USDT or ADA/USDT.

3. Arbitrage between coin- and USDT-margined legs of the same underlying is constrained by funding rate divergence and basis differentials, especially during extreme volatility.

4. Exchange custody models differ: coin-margined wallets require segregated cold storage for each asset type, whereas USDT-margined systems centralize risk management around a single stablecoin reserve.

5. Settlement failures are rare but more consequential in coin-margined environments — a network congestion event delaying BTC withdrawals could impair margin top-ups during fast-moving markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can I use BTC as margin for a USDT-margined contract?No. USDT-margined contracts strictly accept USDT or other designated stablecoins like USDC or BUSD. BTC deposits cannot serve as margin in these accounts.

Q2: Why do some traders prefer coin-margined contracts despite complexity?Traders with large BTC holdings use coin-margined futures to hedge spot exposure without converting into stablecoins, avoiding slippage and counterparty risk associated with off-chain stablecoin issuance.

Q3: Are funding rates identical between coin- and USDT-margined versions of the same pair?No. Funding rates diverge based on market demand, open interest distribution, and exchange-specific calculation methodologies — even for BTC/USD and BTC/USDT contracts on the same platform.

Q4: Does leverage availability differ across margin types?Yes. Exchanges often cap maximum leverage lower for coin-margined contracts — for instance, 100x on USDT-BTC versus 50x on coin-BTC — reflecting operational risk and historical default patterns.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct