UNISWAP实验室将Bancor的专利侵权诉讼视为“毫无根据的”和对Defi生态系统开源精神的“威胁”

指控UNISWAP违反了与自动化做市商（AMM）有关的专利，于5月10日在美国地方法院起诉到美国地方法院。

Uniswap Labs has come out strongly against a new lawsuit from Bancor, which threatens to heat up a legal battle between two DeFi giants.

Uniswap Labs强烈反对Bancor的一项新诉讼，该诉讼可能会加剧两个Defi巨人之间的法律斗争。

In a statement on May 11, Uniswap Labs dismissed the patent infringement accusations as "unfounded" and a threat to the open-source ethos of the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. The answer, which follows a legal action by Bprotocol Foundation (the parent of Bancor), prepares the ground for a fierce fight between two long-standing DeFi participants.

在5月11日的一份声明中，Uniswap Labs驳回了专利侵权指控为“无所作为”，并威胁着分散融资（DEFI）生态系统的开源精神。该答案遵循Brotocol Foundation（Bancor的父母）的法律诉讼，为两个长期的Defi参与者之间的激烈斗争做准备。

The Lawsuit: Patent Claims Over AMM Technology

诉讼：对AMM技术的专利主张

Alleging Uniswap infringed a patent related to automated market makers (AMMs), Bancor sued in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on May 10. Filed in 2019, the patent describes a method based on liquidity pools for enabling token trades - a concept that has been foundational in DeFi since its early days.

该专利指控侵犯了与自动化做市商（AMM）有关的专利，该专利于2019年5月10日在美国德克萨斯州东部地区的地方法院起诉。该专利于2019年提交，该专利介绍了一种基于流动性池的方法，用于实现标志性交易 - 自早期以来就已经在Defi中建立了这一概念。

Bancor claims that Uniswap's design, especially its use of smart contracts to facilitate decentralized exchanges, goes against the main assertions of this patent. The lawsuit seeks damages and an injunction to halt Uniswap from further infringements.

Bancor声称，Uniswap的设计，尤其是使用智能合约来促进分散交流的设计，违背了该专利的主要主张。该诉讼寻求损害赔偿和禁令，以阻止进一步侵权。

Uniswap Labs Fires Back: "A Wasteful Distraction"

Uniswap Labs发射了反向：“浪费的分心”

On its part, Uniswap Labs responded by stating that it will "vigorously defend" itself and considers this matter a distraction.

在这方面，Uniswap Labs回应说，它将“有力地捍卫”自己，并认为这件事是分心的。

"This is a wasteful distraction, and we believe the lawsuit to be without merit. The technology in question is not proprietary; it is owned by the Web3 community," the corporation said.

该公司说：“这是一种浪费的分散注意力，我们认为诉讼是无效的。有关技术不是专有的；它归Web3社区拥有。”

Highlighting how open-source innovation and cooperation are the cornerstones of the larger DeFi movement, Uniswap Labs noted that it has always been open about the role of Bancor and other protocols in the journey of the Labs to build Uniswap.

Uniswap Labs强调了更大的Defi运动的开源创新与合作是多么较大的Defi运动的基石，并指出，它始终是关于Bancor和其他协议在实验室旅程中建立Uniswap的作用的开放式。

The team claims that Bancor's activities threaten to compromise the very values that have driven DeFi to become rather popular.

该团队声称，驾驶员的活动有可能损害驱使Defi变得相当受欢迎的价值观。

"This is not how innovation works, and we will fight these claims fiercely; we are pleased to have helped move the space forward. Uniswap Labs is grateful to the community for its support as we continue to build and develop," the statement concludes.

声明总结说：“这不是创新的运作方式，我们将激烈地与这些主张作斗争；我们很高兴能帮助推动空间的前进。当我们继续建立和发展时，Uniswap Labs感谢社区的支持。”

A Deeper Conflict Over DeFi's Future

对Defi的未来的更深层次的冲突

Although the lawsuit is ostensibly about patent rights, many observers view it as part of a broader clash within the fabric of DeFi itself: the collision of proprietary interests with open-source ideals.

尽管诉讼表面上是关于专利权的，但许多观察家将其视为Defi本身结构中更广泛冲突的一部分：具有开源理想的专有利益的碰撞。

Launched in 2018, Uniswap has long been a champion of open-source technologies and encourages community contributions. On the other hand, Bancor, which began in 2017, has adopted a more cautious attitude to its intellectual property, although it was an early innovator in AMM protocols.

Uniswap于2018年成立，长期以来一直是开源技术的拥护者，并鼓励社区贡献。另一方面，始于2017年的Bancor对其知识产权采取了更加谨慎的态度，尽管它是AMM协议的早期创新者。

Industry insiders express concern that cases like this one could hamper growth and lead to fragmentation in an environment that depends on interoperability.

行业内部人士表示关注，这样的案件可能会阻碍增长并导致依赖互操作性的环境中的破碎。

"We lose the very thing that makes DeFi great—the ability to innovate without asking permission—if every protocol begins locking down its creations," one unnamed developer told The Block.

一位不愿透露姓名的开发人员告诉《街区》：“如果每个协议都开始锁定其创作，我们将失去使Defi伟大的创新能力 - 创新的能力。”

What's Next?

接下来是什么？

Uniswap Labs has stated that it will continue developing and developing new technologies and that it will defend itself against the lawsuit. Legal experts believe the matter could take months or perhaps years to settle and might set a precedent for intellectual property handling in decentralized ecosystems.

Uniswap Labs表示，它将继续开发和开发新技术，并将为诉讼辩护。法律专家认为，此事可能需要数月甚至数年的时间才能解决，并可能为分散生态系统的知识产权处理树立先例。

At present, the lawsuit is still in its early stages and no injunction has been issued. Although the lawsuit has sparked fresh discussion about how much legal protection should exist for concepts in the DeFi universe, Uniswap's development and token activities remain largely unaffected.

目前，该诉讼仍处于早期阶段，尚未发布禁令。尽管该诉讼已经引发了关于Defi宇宙中应该存在多少法律保护的新讨论，但Unistwap的发展和代币活动仍然很大程度上不受影响。

The more pressing question might not be who wins as the legal dust settles but how this conflict alters the culture and cooperation fabric of crypto.

更紧迫的问题可能不是谁赢得法律尘埃的胜利，而是这种冲突如何改变加密的文化与合作结构。