|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
英国高等法院法官裁定,美国计算机科学家克雷格·赖特在审判期间撒谎并犯有伪造罪,其核心是他自称是比特币创造者中本聪。詹姆斯·梅勒法官得出的结论是,赖特使用了伪造的文件,并在宣誓后做出了虚假陈述,支持了他的说法,即赖特不是中本聪,也不是比特币基础白皮书的作者。

U.K. High Court Rules American Computer Scientist Craig Wright Committed Perjury and Forgery in Bitcoin Creator Lawsuit
英国高等法院裁定美国计算机科学家克雷格·赖特在比特币创造者诉讼中犯有伪证和伪造罪
London, United Kingdom - In a landmark decision that has sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry, a U.K. High Court judge has ruled that American computer scientist Craig Wright lied and forged documents during his trial in which he claimed to be the creator of Bitcoin, the enigmatic digital currency.
英国伦敦 - 英国高等法院法官做出了一项里程碑式的判决,震惊了加密货币行业,裁定美国计算机科学家克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 在审判期间撒谎并伪造文件,声称自己是比特币的创造者。神秘的数字货币。
In a written judgment published on Monday, May 16, 2022, Justice James Mellor concluded that Wright committed perjury during the six-week COPA v Wright trial, where he contended that he was the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin, known as Satoshi Nakamoto. Justice Mellor's meticulously researched judgment is a damning indictment of Wright's credibility and the veracity of his Bitcoin creation claims.
在 2022 年 5 月 16 日星期一发布的一份书面判决中,法官詹姆斯·梅勒 (James Mellor) 得出结论,赖特在为期六周的 COPA 诉赖特 (COPA v Wright) 审判中犯下了伪证罪,他在审判中声称自己是比特币的化名发明者,即中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto)。梅勒法官经过精心研究的判决是对赖特的可信度和他的比特币创造主张的真实性的严厉控诉。
"It is clear that Dr. Wright engaged in the deliberate production of false documents to support false claims and use the Courts as a vehicle for fraud," Justice Mellor wrote in his scathing judgment. "I am entirely satisfied that Dr. Wright lied to the Court extensively and repeatedly. All his lies and forged documents were in support of his biggest lie: his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto."
梅勒法官在严厉的判决中写道:“很明显,赖特博士故意制作虚假文件来支持虚假主张,并利用法院作为欺诈的工具。” “我完全满意赖特博士多次向法院撒谎。他的所有谎言和伪造文件都支持他最大的谎言:他声称自己是中本聪。”
The ruling is the culmination of a years-long legal battle between Wright and the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), a key player in the crypto industry. COPA filed a lawsuit against Wright in 2021, accusing him of forging documents and lying under oath about his involvement with Bitcoin.
该裁决是 Wright 与加密行业关键参与者加密开放专利联盟 (COPA) 之间长达数年法律斗争的高潮。 COPA 于 2021 年对 Wright 提起诉讼,指控他伪造文件并就其参与比特币的问题宣誓撒谎。
During the trial, Wright presented himself as an extremely clever individual, but Justice Mellor found otherwise. "However, in my judgment, he is not nearly as clever as he thinks he is," Justice Mellor remarked in his judgment.
在审判期间,赖特表现得非常聪明,但梅勒法官却发现并非如此。 “然而,根据我的判断,他并不像他想象的那么聪明,”梅勒法官在他的判决中说道。
In March 2022, Justice Mellor had already concluded that Wright was not Nakamoto and had not authored Bitcoin's foundational document, the "white paper." This latest ruling further undermines Wright's credibility and casts serious doubt on his claims to have been involved in Bitcoin's creation.
2022 年 3 月,梅勒法官已经得出结论,赖特不是中本聪,也没有撰写比特币的基础文件“白皮书”。这项最新裁决进一步削弱了赖特的可信度,并使人们对他参与比特币创造的说法产生严重怀疑。
The ruling has significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry. It confirms Bitcoin's decentralized and leaderless essence and ensures that no single individual can claim its origins. This ruling finally resolves one of the most controversial and widely publicized claims regarding the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.
该裁决对加密货币行业具有重大影响。它证实了比特币的去中心化和无领导的本质,并确保没有任何一个人可以声称其起源。这项裁决最终解决了有关化名中本聪的最具争议性和广为人知的指控之一。
The legal ramifications of Wright's perjury remain to be seen, but $7.6 million of his assets were frozen in March to prevent him from moving them offshore to avoid the case's costs. Wright, sensing his impending defeat, attempted to settle the dispute with COPA out of court in January, but COPA declined the offer.
赖特作伪证的法律后果仍有待观察,但他的 760 万美元资产在 3 月份被冻结,以防止他将这些资产转移到海外以避免案件费用。怀特意识到自己即将失败,一月份试图在法庭外解决与 COPA 的纠纷,但 COPA 拒绝了这一提议。
Wright has yet to publicly respond to Justice Mellor's stinging rebuke. However, he has posted a statement on X, stating, "I fully intend to appeal the decision of the court on the matter of the identity issue."
赖特尚未公开回应梅勒法官的严厉指责。不过,他在X上发表声明称,“我完全打算对法院关于身份问题的判决提出上诉。”
The cryptocurrency community is eagerly awaiting the next chapter in this saga as Wright pursues his appeal. However, given the overwhelming evidence of his perjury and forgery, it is likely that his legal challenges will be met with skepticism and ultimately fail.
随着赖特继续上诉,加密货币社区正在热切等待这一传奇故事的下一章。然而,鉴于他的伪证和伪造的大量证据,他的法律挑战很可能会遭到怀疑并最终失败。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

































