Tron 赢得针对 SEC 指控的关键动议

在最近的法律进展中，纽约一名联邦法官驳回了 SEC 加速对 Tron 基金会及其首席执行官提起诉讼的动议

A federal judge in New York has recently rejected the SEC’s motion to accelerate its lawsuit against the Tron Foundation, its CEO Justin Sun, and the SEC intended to address the procedural concerns that may lead to the trial soon. This denial may impact the SEC’s handling of future securities matters and raise questions about the implications of such actions.

纽约一名联邦法官最近驳回了 SEC 加速对 Tron 基金会及其首席执行官孙宇晨提起诉讼的动议，SEC 打算解决可能很快导致审判的程序问题。这一否认可能会影响美国证券交易委员会对未来证券事务的处理，并引发对此类行为影响的质疑。

Tron Wins Key Motion Against SEC Allegations

Tron 赢得针对 SEC 指控的关键动议

The judge denied the SEC’s request for a pre-trial conference and further submissions. The agency aimed to respond to the defendants’ new arguments regarding the ‘common enterprise’ element of the Howey Test, which is essential for identifying investment contracts under U.S. securities laws. However, the court maintained that the defense failed to meet this element, dismissing the SEC’s claims of procedural impropriety.

法官拒绝了 SEC 举行预审会议和进一步提交材料的请求。该机构旨在回应被告关于豪伊测试“共同企业”要素的新论点，该测试对于根据美国证券法识别投资合同至关重要。然而，法院坚持认为辩方未能满足这一要素，驳回了 SEC 关于程序不当的指控。

Justin Sun’s legal representatives claimed that the SEC was creating a conflict where there was none, concentrating on the third prong of the Howey Test that addresses investment expectations. They accused the SEC of complicating the matter. The defense maintained that its position was clear and that the SEC painted a wrong picture.

孙宇晨的法律代表声称，美国证券交易委员会正在制造一场原本并不存在的冲突，其重点是解决投资预期的豪伊测试的第三个方面。他们指责美国证券交易委员会使事情复杂化。辩方坚称其立场很明确，并且 SEC 描绘了错误的图景。

The defense also argued that the SEC’s request for additional paperwork was unwarranted. They stated that their main argument was strong, and the introduction of more documents would only muddle the proceedings. The legal representatives of Tron and Sun claimed that the regulator had mischaracterized their position throughout the process.

辩方还辩称，美国证券交易委员会要求提供额外文件的要求是没有根据的。他们表示，他们的主要论点很有力，引入更多文件只会让程序变得混乱。 Tron 和 Sun 的法律代表声称监管机构在整个过程中错误地描述了他们的立场。

Tron Disputes SEC’s Overseas Jurisdiction Claims

Tron 对 SEC 的海外管辖权主张提出争议

One of the main points of contention in this case was the legal question of whether the SEC has the authority to oversee the sales of TRX and BTT tokens. In its defense, Tron maintained that the majority of the token sales occurred in markets outside the United States and were thus not subject to SEC regulation. The defense argued that this was a matter involving international business transactions where US Securities Laws were not applicable.

本案的主要争议点之一是 SEC 是否有权监督 TRX 和 BTT 代币销售的法律问题。 Tron 在辩护中坚称，大部分代币销售发生在美国以外的市场，因此不受 SEC 监管。辩方辩称，这是一个涉及国际商业交易的事项，不适用美国证券法。

In response, the SEC argued in April that Justin Sun’s multiple visits to the United States during the relevant period provided sufficient basis for jurisdiction. The agency claimed that Sun’s trips were made on behalf of Tron and the associated companies, connecting the case to the U.S. securities laws.

对此，SEC 在 4 月份辩称，孙宇晨在相关期间多次访问美国，为管辖权提供了充分的依据。该机构声称孙宇晨的旅行是代表波场及其关联公司进行的，将此案与美国证券法联系起来。

The defense contended that the SEC’s jurisdiction was being applied excessively in this case. They argued that the focus on Sun’s travel was an attempt to extend the legal jurisdiction of the United States extra-territorially.

辩方辩称，美国证券交易委员会的管辖权在此案中被过度适用。他们认为，对孙宇晨旅行的关注是试图将美国的法律管辖权扩展到域外。

SEC Faces Challenges After Legal Setback

SEC 在法律挫折后面临挑战

This rejection for the SEC and Tron’s stand against SEC’s jurisdiction in this matter also has the potential to open up larger issues relating to regulation or lack thereof in the cryptocurrency landscape. The outcome of this lawsuit is expected to have major implications for the entire crypto industry as the issue of regulatory framework continues to play out in the backdrop of ongoing innovations and developments

SEC 的拒绝以及 Tron 在此事上反对 SEC 管辖权的立场也有可能引发与加密货币领域监管或缺乏监管相关的更大问题。随着监管框架问题在不断创新和发展的背景下继续发挥作用，该诉讼的结果预计将对整个加密货币行业产生重大影响