韩国将大幅度地重塑其数字资产格局，并有可能将自己定位为加密货币法规的全球领导者。

在新当选的总统李·蒙蒙（Lee Jae-Myung）的领导下，执政的民主党推出了《数字资产基本法》。

South Korea is set for a dramatic reshaping of its digital asset landscape, potentially positioning itself as a global leader in cryptocurrency regulations.

韩国将重塑其数字资产格局，并有可能将自己定位为加密货币法规的全球领导者。

This transformation is unfolding rapidly with the ruling Democratic Party, headed by President Lee Jae-myung, introducing the Digital Asset Basic Act. The aim is to enhance transparency and foster competition within the crypto sector.

由总统李·詹·蒙（Lee Jae-Myung）领导的执政民主党在迅速发展，引入了《数字资产基本法》。目的是提高加密货币部门内的透明度和促进竞争。

A cornerstone of this ambitious plan is the clear intent to facilitate stablecoin use and issuance.

这个雄心勃勃的计划的基石是明确的意图，目的是促进稳定使用和发行。

South Korea pushes for stablecoin regulations

韩国推动稳定法规

韩国推动稳定法规

Notably, President Lee’s campaign promise to permit domestic stablecoin issuance is now rapidly translating into concrete policy.

值得注意的是，李总统的竞选承诺允许国内稳定发行签发，现在正在迅速转化为具体政策。

This proactive and defined approach to digital asset governance raises a crucial question – Will South Korea’s upcoming regulatory framework grant it a distinct competitive advantage over nations like the United States in the evolving global crypto industry?

这种积极且定义的数字资产治理方法提出了一个至关重要的问题 - 韩国即将到来的监管框架是否会给它与像美国这样不断发展的全球加密货币行业这样的美国具有独特的竞争优势吗？

Commenting on the same, Lee said,

李说，对此发表评论，

“We need to establish a won-backed stablecoin market to prevent national wealth from leaking overseas.”

“我们需要建立一个赢得的稳定稳定市场，以防止国民财富泄漏在海外。”

Additionally, beyond its significant focus on stablecoins, South Korea has been demonstrating a broader commitment to integrating cryptocurrencies into its financial landscape.

此外，除了其对稳定剂的重大关注之外，韩国还表现出更广泛的承诺，将加密货币整合到其金融景观中。

For this, President Lee Jae-myung’s administration is now exploring various avenues. Including a proposal for the country’s national pension fund to consider Bitcoin [BTC] and other crypto investments.

为此，总统李·钟（Lee Jae-Myung）的政府现在正在探索各种途径。包括该国国家养老基金的提案，以考虑比特币[BTC]和其他加密投资。

Furthermore, the nation is actively investigating the feasibility of establishing a dedicated Bitcoin reserve.

此外，该国正在积极调查建立专用比特币储备的可行性。

What’s more to the bill?

该法案还有什么？

South Korea has already begun to amend its anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, with the explicit goal of encouraging greater participation from foreign investors within its domestic crypto market.

韩国已经开始修改其反洗钱（AML）法规，其明确的目标是鼓励外国投资者更多地参与其国内加密货币市场。

Hence, as nations worldwide grapple with the complexities of digital asset regulation, both the United States and South Korea are taking decisive steps to establish clear legal frameworks for stablecoins, albeit with distinct philosophies.

因此，随着全球与数字资产监管的复杂性的努力，美国和韩国都在采取果断的步骤，以建立明确的法律框架，为稳定的稳定框架，尽管具有独特的哲学。

In the U.S, the GENIUS Act, currently undergoing a crucial Senate vote, primarily targets payment stablecoins.

在美国，目前接受重要参议院投票的《天才法》主要针对付款稳定。

It proposes a dual regulatory model, with federal oversight for large issuers boasting over $10 billion in circulation and state-level management for smaller entities. This approach aims to provide clarity without encompassing the entire spectrum of digital assets.

它提出了一种双重监管模型，对大型发行人的联邦监督拥有超过100亿美元的发行和较小实体的州级管理。这种方法旨在提供清晰度，而不包含整个数字资产范围。

Conversely, South Korea’s Digital Asset Basic Act, championed by President Lee Jae-myung, adopts a more sweeping approach. It intends to regulate a broader range of digital assets, including asset-linked tokens beyond just payment stablecoins, all covered by a comprehensive digital finance umbrella.

相反，由李·蒙（Lee Jae-Myung）总统倡导的韩国数字资产基本法案采用了一种更加广泛的方法。它打算规范更广泛的数字资产，包括与资产相关的代币，而不仅仅是付款稳定的，所有这些都是由全面的数字金融伞所涵盖的。

How is it different from the U.S GENIUS Act?

它与《美国天才法》有何不同？

While both legislative efforts mandate licensing requirements and seek to promote safer stablecoin adoption, their implementation strategies diverge significantly.

尽管这两项立法努力都授权许可要求并试图促进采用更安全的稳定者，但其实施策略却大大不同。

South Korea centralizes all stablecoin issuance approval under its Financial Services Commission, a move that promises consistency but has drawn criticism from the Bank of Korea for concentrating regulatory power.

韩国将所有Stablecoin发行批准集中在其金融服务委员会下，此举有望保持一致性，但已引起韩国银行对集中监管权力的批评。

In contrast, the GENIUS Act introduces a more decentralized model, allowing for state-level regulation where appropriate.

相比之下，《天才法》引入了一个更加分散的模型，可以在适当的情况下进行状态级别的调节。

Furthermore, a key difference lies in consumer protection specifics. The U.S. bill includes stringent transparency requirements, anti-fraud measures, and explicit mandates for anti-money laundering and know-your-customer compliance.

此外，关键区别在于消费者保护的细节。美国法案包括严格的透明度要求，反欺诈措施以及针对反洗钱和了解自己的遵守情况的明确要求。

While South Korea’s bill emphasizes transparency and reserve guarantees, it currently lacks the detailed rules around user-facing protections found in its American counterpart.

尽管韩国的法案强调透明度和储备保证，但目前缺乏有关其美国同行中面向用户的保护的详细规则。