这始终是风险。 Leafs在Berube下的新身份尚未产生预期的结果。

这始终是风险。在整个赛季中，多伦多枫叶队在近距离比赛之后进行了近距离比赛，而硬币式弹跳游戏本质上都可能已经走了。

The Toronto Maple Leafs are a team that likes to play close games. In fact, they're coin-flip contenders.

多伦多枫叶是一个喜欢玩近距离比赛的团队。实际上，它们是硬币翼竞争者。

This was always the risk. All season long, the Leafs played close game after close game, coin-flip games, essentially, that could have gone either way.

这始终是风险。整个赛季，Leafs在近距离比赛之后进行了近距离比赛，从本质上讲，Coin-Flip Games都可以进行。

And in Games 2 and 3 of this first-round series, the Leafs won those coin flips, beating the Ottawa Senators twice in overtime.

在首轮系列赛的第2和第3场比赛中，Leafs赢得了这些硬币翻转，在加时赛中两次击败了渥太华参议员。

But that’s the thing with coin flips. They are 50-50 propositions. In Games 4 and 5, the coin flip suddenly went the other way.

但这就是硬币翻转的事情。他们是50-50个命题。在第4和第5场比赛中，硬币翻转突然进行了另一种方式。

On Tuesday night, with a second chance to bury the Sens, the Leafs failed to score even once.

在星期二晚上，有了第二次掩埋感官的机会，叶子甚至没有得分一次。

In terms of quality, their five-on-five offence has been just about the worst of any team in the playoffs (as of this writing).

在质量方面，他们的五对五进攻几乎是季后赛中任何球队中最糟糕的（截至撰写本文）。

Those 1.83 expected goals per 60 minutes at five-on-five are lower than any team in the playoffs and are up from 2.4 during the regular season, which still only ranked 22nd overall. The Leafs are mustering just over six high-danger shot attempts per 60 in these playoffs, easily the worst of any playoff team (the Hurricanes are up over 14).

五对五对五对五分球的1.83个预期进球低于季后赛中的任何球队，并且在常规赛中的2.4次，总排名仅排名第22位。在这些季后赛中，叶子正召集每60次超过6次高射击的尝试，这很容易成为任何季后赛中最糟糕的球队（飓风超过14个）。

In other words, the Leafs aren’t generating a lot of the good stuff around the Ottawa net. Or much stuff, period. They rank last in shot attempt rate and second-last (topping only the Sens) in shot rate.

换句话说，叶子没有在渥太华网上产生很多好东西。或很多东西，时期。他们在射击率和第二次射击率中排名最后。

If not for the shaky goaltending early in the series from Linus Ullmark, the Leafs wouldn’t have as many five-on-five goals this series (10) as they do. (And two of those goals came in overtimes.) Ullmark turned down every good-to-great look they had in Game 5 with a 29-save shutout.

如果不是因为Linus Ullmark的系列赛初期的摇摇欲坠的守门员，那么本系列（10）的Leafs就不会像他们那样多五对五个进球。 （这些进球中有两个是在加时赛的。）Ullmark拒绝了他们在第5场比赛中以29个弹跳的方式拒绝的每一个美好​​的外观。

Dig into the five-on-five production and you’ll see that exactly half of the goals came from defencemen. In fact, the co-team leaders in five-on-five goals this series are both defencemen: Morgan Rielly and Oliver Ekman-Larsson, with two each.

挖掘五对五对五的作品，您会看到一半的进球来自防守队员。实际上，本系列赛的共同团队领导者是五对五个进球的领导者：摩根·瑞尔利（Morgan Rielly）和奥利弗·埃克曼·拉尔森（Oliver Ekman-Larsson），每个都有两个。

In other words:

换句话说：

Defencemen: 5

防守队员：5

Forwards: 5

前锋：5

William Nylander, who led the team in five-on-five goals during the regular season, still has yet to score one in this series while Craig Berube continues to search for the right left winger to play alongside him and John Tavares.

威廉·尼兰德（William Nylander）在常规赛中以五对五进球为进球的威廉·尼兰德（William Nylander）仍然在本系列赛中得分一个，而克雷格·贝鲁伯（Craig Berube）继续寻找右左翼，与他和约翰·塔瓦雷斯（John Tavares）一起比赛。

In Game 5 alone, the Leafs coach tried Pontus Holmberg, Bobby McMann, Max Domi and Calle Järnkrok.

仅在第5场比赛中，LEAFS教练就尝试了Pontus Holmberg，Bobby McMann，Max Domi和CalleJärnkrok。

Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner, Matthew Knies and Tavares have scored one five-on-five goal apiece in this series.

奥斯顿·马修斯（Auston Matthews），米奇·马纳（Mitch Marner），马修·诺斯（Matthew Knies）和塔瓦雷斯（Tavares）在本系列赛中攻入了一个五对五个进球。

Domi scored the other one for the forwards in overtime of Game 2.

多米（Domi）在第2场加时赛中为前锋队攻入了另一个。

When they hired Berube last summer to replace Sheldon Keefe, the Leafs decided it was better to play this way. The Berube Way would eliminate risk. The Leafs would take fewer chances and as a result, they would give up fewer chances. That would lead to more (any!) success in the playoffs.

当他们去年夏天聘请Berube取代Sheldon Keefe时，Leafs决定最好这样玩。 Berube方法将消除风险。叶子的机会更少，因此，他们放弃了更少的机会。这将在季后赛中带来更多（任何！）的成功。

But there was always a hitch with that plan.

但是这个计划总是有一个障碍。

A team that had struggled to score in the playoffs with a more explosive style of offence was now deciding, essentially, that scoring less would be better in the end.

一支努力在季后赛中以更爆炸性的进攻方式得分的球队现在决定，从本质上讲，最终得分较低。

The Leafs were making the margins for victory slimmer than before that way. More chances to win or lose 2-1 games than blow teams away 5-1. And if their power play went cold, well, trouble might strike. And of course, the power play has gone 0-7 in the last two losses, failing to score when they needed to in Game 5, especially.

叶子的胜利边缘比以前比以前更苗条。比以5-1击败球队赢得或输掉2-1场比赛的机会更多。而且，如果他们的力量发作变冷，那么麻烦可能会遇到麻烦。当然，在过去的两次损失中，强力比赛已经取得了0-7的成绩，尤其是在第5场比赛中需要得分。

The Leafs have had only one consistently dangerous line against the Sens, and that’s been the top unit of Knies, Matthews and Marner. It was mostly one-and-done in Game 5.

叶子对感官只有一条始终如一的危险线，这是刀具，马修斯和马纳的顶级单位。在第5场比赛中大部分是一劳永逸的。

Not having Matthews at 100 percent is obviously no small detail in the five-on-five struggles.

在五对五对斗争中，没有100％的马修斯的细节显然不是很小的细节。

The greatest five-on-five scorer in hockey before this season struggled all season to produce there, finishing with a career-low (by far) 15 goals. He had 38 last season.

在本赛季之前，最伟大的五对五对五对射手在整个赛季都挣扎着在那里制作，以职业生涯低下（到目前为止）15个进球。上个赛季他有38个。

During Tuesday night’s game, Matthews had his left hand treated by Paul Ayotte, the team’s head athletic therapist. This style of play, with more point shots as well as less zone time and possession, probably isn’t helping him either.

在周二晚上的比赛中，马修斯（Matthews）由球队的首席运动治疗师保罗·阿约特（Paul Ayotte）接受了左手治疗。这种风格的比赛风格，更多的射门以及更少的区域时间和财产，也可能没有帮助他。

But this isn’t just about Matthews.

但这不仅仅是马修斯。

The Leafs have struggled to consistently generate quality offence this series. Too many shots from the outside and not enough from the interior of the ice. Rielly leads the team in five-on-five shot attempts against the Senators.

叶子一直在努力始终产生质量进攻这个系列。从外部拍摄太多，冰的内部还不够。 Rielly在对参议员的五对五击中尝试领导球队。

The Tavares-Nylander combo

Tavares-nylander组合