新报告显示洗钱者可以通过利用冻结延迟来窃取多少钱

尽管区块链调查人员在冻结非法资金时抱怨一些集中式交流和稳定发行人的反应缓慢，但一份新报告显示了这一过程是如何工作的以及它已经成本的成本。由Samuele S.

Centralized exchanges and stablecoin issuers have been slow to respond to requests from blockchain investigators to freeze illicit funds, according to a new report by AMLBot.

根据Amlbot的一份新报告，集中式交流和Stablecoin发行人对区块链调查人员的要求响应冻结非法资金的要求很慢。

The report, which was published on Monday, claims that a significant lag between the initiation of a freeze and its actual enforcement has already allowed the transfer of more than $78 million in the Tether (USDT) stablecoin on the Tron (TRX) and Ethereum (ETH) blockchains.

该报告于周一发表，声称冻结的启动与其实际执行之间的滞后滞后已经允许在TRON（TRX）（TRX）和Ethereum（ETH）（ETH）区块链中转移超过7800万美元的链球菌（USDT）Stablecoin。

According to AMLBot, criminals are already familiar with the freezing process and are exploiting it to launder money. They may even be developing new money laundering tools that can be used to automate the process during the freeze delay window.

根据Amlbot的说法，罪犯已经熟悉冻结过程，并将其利用为洗钱。他们甚至可能正在开发新的洗钱工具，这些工具可用于在冻结延迟窗口中自动化该过程。

In one specific case that was presented in the report, it took 44 minutes to freeze USDT on Tron after a suspicious address was flagged. However, during this period, the wallet still had full access to 426,183 USDT, which means that a fast-acting operator could have moved the funds before the freeze took effect.

在报告中提出的一个具体情况下，在标记可疑地址后，花了44分钟才能在Tron上冻结USDT。但是，在此期间，该钱包仍然可以完全访问426,183 USDT，这意味着快速效果的操作员可能会在冻结生效之前将资金移动。

“This isn’s a theoretical weakness. It’s impacting the real world and bad actors are watching,” AMLBot warned.

Amlbot警告说：“这是一个理论上的弱点。这会影响现实世界，而坏演员正在观察。”

According to the crypto AML compliance solutions provider, the delay is likely due to Tether’s custom multi-signature smart contract on Tron, which requires more than one digital signature to confirm a transaction.

根据Crypto AML合规解决方案提供商的说法，延迟可能是由于Tether在TRON上的自定义多符号智能合约，该合约需要多个数字签名来确认交易。

This was likely done to improve internal governance and reduce the risk of unilateral actions, but it also makes a freeze request visible on-chain, allowing criminals to react accordingly.

这可能是为了改善内部治理并降低单方面行动的风险，但它也使冻结请求可见链子，从而使罪犯能够做出相应的反应。

A similar setup for USDT was also identified on Ethereum, with freezing delays of up to one hour, which allowed the withdrawal of at least $28.5 million in USDT on Ethereum.

在以太坊上也确定了类似的USDT设置，冻结延迟最多为一个小时，这使得在以太坊的USDT中至少撤出了至少2850万美元。

“The average amount moved per wallet was over $365,000, which reaffirms that this isn’t a minor flaw—it’s a systemic issue across chains,” the report concluded, adding that, in the case of Tron, $49.6 million was withdrawn during freeze delay windows, with two-three transfers taking place on average.

该报告得出结论，“每个钱包的平均额定金额超过365,000美元，重申这不是一个小缺陷，这是跨连锁店的系统问题。”报告总结说，对于Tron而言，在冻结延迟窗口期间撤回了4,960万美元，平均进行了两分之一的转移。