Instagram的故事足以给市场带动

在每个信号都可以给市场带动的生态系统中，一个Instagram的故事足以播种混乱。 5月8日，官方的chatgpt帐户发布了一个指向泵的链接。

In an ecosystem where every signal can tip the market, even an Instagram story has the power to sow chaos. On May 8, the official ChatGPT account shared a link to a Pump.fun crypto platform in its story, leading to immediate hacking suspicions and doubts about the intention behind this action.

在每个信号都可以给市场带动的生态系统中，即使是Instagram故事也有能力播种混乱。 5月8日，官方的Chatgpt帐户在其故事中共享了一个链接。Fun加密平台，导致对此动作背后的意图产生了骇人听闻的怀疑和怀疑。

ChatGPT's Instagram story sparks reactions and rumors

Chatgpt的Instagram故事引发了反应和谣言

As the most influential AI of the moment seems to be pointing to a dubious project, trust cracks and questions multiply.

由于当下最有影响力的AI似乎指出了一个可疑的项目，因此信任裂缝和问题繁殖。

A Pump.fun contract shared from the official ChatGPT account

从官方CHATGPT帐户共享的泵。

On May 8 at 7:52 PM (Paris time), CoinMarketCap briefly alerted on the X platform :

5月8日，晚上7:52（巴黎时间），CoinMarketCap在X平台上短暂警告：

The official ChatGPT Instagram account posted a pump(.)fun contract address in its stories. The token in question was launched about an hour before the post.

官方的Chatgpt Instagram帐户在其故事中发布了一个泵（。）有趣的合同地址。有问题的令牌是在帖子开始前一个小时发布的。

This message, brief and to the point, states that the official ChatGPT account (belonging to OpenAI) relayed in its Instagram story a contract from the Pump.fun platform, just about an hour after the launch of the affected token.

此消息简要介绍，指出，在受影响的令牌发布后仅一个小时后，官方的Chatgpt帐户（属于OpenAi）在其Instagram故事中传达了一份来自pump.fun平台的合同。

This temporal coincidence—story broadcast and recent token creation—immediately caught attention. Several objective points are to be noted at this stage :

这种时间巧合 - 故事广播和最近的代币创作 - 立即引起了人们的关注。在此阶段要注意几个客观要点：

Faced with this silence, the crypto community is questioning. Internal leak, poorly controlled test, diverted access : the absence of denial as well as confirmation casts a shadow of doubt on the real intentions behind this story. Above all, it highlights the systemic risks caused today by the amplification of unchecked content on platforms with a wide audience.

面对这种沉默，加密社区正在质疑。内部泄漏，控制不良的测试，转移访问：缺乏拒绝以及确认对这个故事背后的真正意图产生了疑问。最重要的是，它突出了今天通过在具有广泛受众群体的平台上放大未检查的内容而引起的系统风险。

Hacking, manipulation, or simple error : several scenarios on the table

黑客攻击，操纵或简单错误：表上的几种情况

For now, no clarification message has been published by OpenAI or by the ChatGPT teams. No official removal of the story has been mentioned by CoinMarketCap. The lack of communication fuels speculation, in a context where precedents abound.

目前，Openai或Chatgpt团队尚未发布澄清消息。 CoinMarketCap尚未提及官方删除这个故事。缺乏沟通燃料的猜测，在先例比比皆是。

In several similar cases, high-authority accounts have been hijacked to promote scams or worthless tokens. However, nothing currently confirms that a hack did take place. Hypotheses range from security failure to an unintentional post via a third-party tool.

在几种类似的情况下，劫持了高授权帐户以促进骗局或毫无价值的令牌。但是，目前没有任何证实确实发生了黑客攻击。假设范围从安全失败到通过第三方工具的无意帖子。

If it is not hacking, then the question of editorial control arises. Is it possible that a third-party team had access to the account ? Or that internal tests were poorly supervised ? This uncertainty fuels distrust. Especially since the Pump.fun crypto platform is, itself, often criticized for its lack of transparency and its potential for rapid market manipulation.

如果不是黑客，那么编辑控制的问题就会出现。第三方团队有可能可以访问该帐户吗？还是内部测试的监督不佳？这种不确定性助长了不信任。特别是因为泵。FUN加密平台本身通常因缺乏透明度和快速市场操纵的潜力而受到批评。