FTX和3AC因15亿美元的索赔而被锁定在一场高风险的法律斗争中。 FTX正在向后推，称3AC的要求不合理。

FTX vs. 3AC: The $1.5 Billion Claim Dispute Explained

FTX与3AC：解释了15亿美元的索赔争议

The ongoing saga of FTX's collapse continues with a new twist: a massive claim dispute with the now-defunct crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). FTX is outrightly rejecting 3AC's $1.53 billion claim, setting the stage for a potentially lengthy legal battle.

FTX崩溃的正在进行的传奇正在持续出现新的转折：与现已灭绝的加密对冲基金（3AC）的巨大索赔纠纷。 FTX完全拒绝了3AC的15.3亿美元索赔，为一场漫长的法律斗争奠定了基础。

The Billion-Dollar Question

十亿美元的问题

3AC initially filed a $120 million claim against FTX, but later increased it to $1.53 billion after securing permission from a Delaware court. 3AC alleges that FTX controlled and liquidated $1.53 billion of their assets in 2022, contributing to their downfall. However, FTX is fighting back, calling the claims "illogical and baseless."

3AC最初对FTX提出了1.2亿美元的索赔，但后来在获得特拉华州法院许可后将其提交了15.3亿美元。 3AC指控FTX在2022年控制并清算了15.3亿美元的资产，导致了他们的失败。但是，FTX正在反击，称这些说法是“不合逻辑的，毫无根据的”。

FTX's Counter-Argument: Risky Bets and Self-Inflicted Wounds

FTX的反驳：有风险的赌注和自我伤口

FTX's lawyers argue that 3AC's collapse was due to its own risky trading strategies and inability to manage risk. They claim 3AC "bet big" that crypto prices would rise, and when they plummeted, the firm became a victim of its own choices. FTX also points out that 3AC had an available balance of only $284 million, which was further reduced by market declines and withdrawals.

FTX的律师认为，3AC的崩溃是由于其自身的风险交易策略和无法管理风险的造成的。他们声称3AC“ BET BIG”，加密价格将上涨，当他们暴跌时，该公司成为了自己选择的受害者。 FTX还指出，3AC的可用余额仅为2.84亿美元，而市场下降和提款进一步降低了。

The $82 Million Liquidation: A Point of Contention

这笔耗资8200万美元的清算：争论点

A key point of contention is an $82 million liquidation executed by FTX on 3AC's account. FTX argues that this liquidation was contractually permitted and actually benefited 3AC by preserving the value of their assets, as it allowed 3AC to exit deteriorating positions in digital assets in favor of stable positions in fiat currency.

一个关键的争论点是FTX在3AC帐户上执行的8200万美元清算。 FTX认为，该清算是合同允许的，实际上通过保留其资产的价值而受益3AC，因为它允许3AC退出数字资产中的不断恶化的头寸，以支持法定货币的稳定头寸。

What's Next?

接下来是什么？

3AC has until July 11th to respond to FTX's objection, with a non-evidentiary hearing scheduled for August 12th. This legal battle is likely to be complex and drawn-out, with significant implications for creditors of both FTX and 3AC.

3AC必须在7月11日之前回应FTX的反对意见，原定于8月12日举行的非任职听证会。这场法律斗争可能很复杂和引人入胜，对FTX和3AC的债权人产生了重大影响。

My Take: A Classic Case of Blame Game

我的看法：经典的责备游戏

It seems like both sides are trying to deflect blame for their respective failures. 3AC is trying to recoup some of its losses by claiming FTX contributed to its downfall, while FTX is trying to protect its estate and creditors from what it sees as an opportunistic claim. Regardless of who's ultimately right, this dispute highlights the high-stakes and often cutthroat nature of the crypto world. It's like watching two toddlers fight over a broken toy, except the toy is worth billions of dollars.

似乎双方都试图将责任归咎于各自的失败。 3AC试图通过声称FTX导致其倒台来弥补其一些损失，而FTX试图保护其房地产和债权人免受机会主义索赔的侵害。不管最终是谁，这一争议都突出了加密货币世界的高风险和经常性质。这就像看着两个幼儿为一个破碎的玩具而战，除了该玩具价值数十亿美元。

Stay tuned, folks, because this crypto soap opera is far from over!

伙计们，请继续关注，因为这部加密肥皂剧还远远没有结束！