FTX和3AC因15億美元的索賠而被鎖定在一場高風險的法律鬥爭中。 FTX正在向後推，稱3AC的要求不合理。

FTX vs. 3AC: The $1.5 Billion Claim Dispute Explained

FTX與3AC：解釋了15億美元的索賠爭議

The ongoing saga of FTX's collapse continues with a new twist: a massive claim dispute with the now-defunct crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). FTX is outrightly rejecting 3AC's $1.53 billion claim, setting the stage for a potentially lengthy legal battle.

FTX崩潰的正在進行的傳奇正在持續出現新的轉折：與現已滅絕的加密對沖基金（3AC）的巨大索賠糾紛。 FTX完全拒絕了3AC的15.3億美元索賠，為一場漫長的法律鬥爭奠定了基礎。

The Billion-Dollar Question

十億美元的問題

3AC initially filed a $120 million claim against FTX, but later increased it to $1.53 billion after securing permission from a Delaware court. 3AC alleges that FTX controlled and liquidated $1.53 billion of their assets in 2022, contributing to their downfall. However, FTX is fighting back, calling the claims "illogical and baseless."

3AC最初對FTX提出了1.2億美元的索賠，但後來在獲得特拉華州法院許可後將其提交了15.3億美元。 3AC指控FTX在2022年控制並清算了15.3億美元的資產，導致了他們的失敗。但是，FTX正在反擊，稱這些說法是“不合邏輯的，毫無根據的”。

FTX's Counter-Argument: Risky Bets and Self-Inflicted Wounds

FTX的反駁：有風險的賭注和自我傷口

FTX's lawyers argue that 3AC's collapse was due to its own risky trading strategies and inability to manage risk. They claim 3AC "bet big" that crypto prices would rise, and when they plummeted, the firm became a victim of its own choices. FTX also points out that 3AC had an available balance of only $284 million, which was further reduced by market declines and withdrawals.

FTX的律師認為，3AC的崩潰是由於其自身的風險交易策略和無法管理風險的造成的。他們聲稱3AC“ BET BIG”，加密價格將上漲，當他們暴跌時，該公司成為了自己選擇的受害者。 FTX還指出，3AC的可用餘額僅為2.84億美元，而市場下降和提款進一步降低了。

The $82 Million Liquidation: A Point of Contention

這筆耗資8200萬美元的清算：爭論點

A key point of contention is an $82 million liquidation executed by FTX on 3AC's account. FTX argues that this liquidation was contractually permitted and actually benefited 3AC by preserving the value of their assets, as it allowed 3AC to exit deteriorating positions in digital assets in favor of stable positions in fiat currency.

一個關鍵的爭論點是FTX在3AC帳戶上執行的8200萬美元清算。 FTX認為，該清算是合同允許的，實際上通過保留其資產的價值而受益3AC，因為它允許3AC退出數字資產中的不斷惡化的頭寸，以支持法定貨幣的穩定頭寸。

What's Next?

接下來是什麼？

3AC has until July 11th to respond to FTX's objection, with a non-evidentiary hearing scheduled for August 12th. This legal battle is likely to be complex and drawn-out, with significant implications for creditors of both FTX and 3AC.

3AC必須在7月11日之前回應FTX的反對意見，原定於8月12日舉行的非任職聽證會。這場法律鬥爭可能很複雜和引人入勝，對FTX和3AC的債權人產生了重大影響。

My Take: A Classic Case of Blame Game

我的看法：經典的責備遊戲

It seems like both sides are trying to deflect blame for their respective failures. 3AC is trying to recoup some of its losses by claiming FTX contributed to its downfall, while FTX is trying to protect its estate and creditors from what it sees as an opportunistic claim. Regardless of who's ultimately right, this dispute highlights the high-stakes and often cutthroat nature of the crypto world. It's like watching two toddlers fight over a broken toy, except the toy is worth billions of dollars.

似乎雙方都試圖將責任歸咎於各自的失敗。 3AC試圖通過聲稱FTX導致其倒台來彌補其一些損失，而FTX試圖保護其房地產和債權人免受機會主義索賠的侵害。不管最終是誰，這一爭議都突出了加密貨幣世界的高風險和經常性質。這就像看著兩個幼兒為一個破碎的玩具而戰，除了該玩具價值數十億美元。

Stay tuned, folks, because this crypto soap opera is far from over!

伙計們，請繼續關注，因為這部加密肥皂劇還遠遠沒有結束！