以太坊会因其意识形态而失败吗？

最近，社交媒体平台 X 上的一系列激烈交流中，加密货币交易巨头 Wintermute 的创始人兼首席执行官 Evgeny Gaevoy 引发了一场引人注目的争论

A recent flurry of heated exchanges on social media platform X saw Evgeny Gaevoy, the founder and CEO of crypto trading powerhouse Wintermute, sparking a notable debate about the future of Ethereum and its leadership.

最近，加密货币交易巨头 Wintermute 的创始人兼首席执行官 Evgeny Gaevoy 在社交媒体平台 X 上发生了一系列激烈的交流，引发了关于以太坊未来及其领导地位的引人注目的辩论。

In a pointed critique, Gaevoy suggested that potential failures in Ethereum would not stem from technological competition like Solana, but rather from ideological contradictions within its own leadership.

Gaevoy 在尖锐的批评中表示，以太坊的潜在失败不会像 Solana 那样源于技术竞争，而是源于其领导层内部的意识形态矛盾。

Gaevoy's remarks followed comments from Hayden Adams, known for his pioneering work on the Uniswap protocol, who had earlier expressed his tolerance and perceived value in meme-centric cryptocurrencies, emphasizing their role in promoting social causes.

Gaevoy 发表此番言论之前，海登·亚当斯 (Hayden Adams) 因在 Uniswap 协议方面的开创性工作而闻名，他早些时候曾表达过对以 meme 为中心的加密货币的容忍和感知价值，强调其在促进社会事业方面的作用。

“I think there’s value to memetic attention and it’s cool to create markets for it. That said, the underlying purpose and value of the tech goes way beyond financial games,” he stated.

“我认为模因关注是有价值的，为其创造市场很酷。也就是说，该技术的根本目的和价值远远超出了金融游戏，”他表示。

Contrasting with Adams, Gaevoy argued, “Blockchain tech is impressively super well conductive to create purely capitalist incentive-based systems. At the same time, Vitalik [Buterin], Hayden [Adams] and many others are trying to ‘solve capitalism’ […] You are either building capitalism or planned socialism. I'm sorry, you really can’t have both.”

与亚当斯相比，盖沃伊认为，“区块链技术对于创建纯粹基于资本主义激励的系统具有令人印象深刻的超级好作用。与此同时，Vitalik [Buterin]、Hayden [Adams] 和许多其他人正在尝试“解决资本主义”[...] 你要么正在建设资本主义，要么正在计划社会主义。抱歉，你真的不能两者兼得。”

He added that he’ll choose “capitalism in all its (often ugly!) glory. And if you are not here for glory, then one simple argument is – unlike socialism, capitalism actually works.”

他补充说，他将选择“资本主义的所有（通常是丑陋的！）荣耀。如果你来这里不是为了荣耀，那么一个简单的论点就是——与社会主义不同，资本主义实际上是有效的。”

This notion sparked a broader dialogue within the crypto community, attracting comments from other industry leaders. Ari Paul, CEO of BlockTower Capital, entered the debate suggesting Gaevoy's view represented a “false dichotomy.”

这一概念引发了加密货币社区内更广泛的对话，吸引了其他行业领导者的评论。 BlockTower Capital 首席执行官阿里·保罗 (Ari Paul) 参与了辩论，暗示盖沃伊的观点代表了“错误的二分法”。

Paul analogized the situation to societal norms about propriety in shared spaces, such as elevators, arguing that just because one advocates for polite behavior does not mean they reject other priorities like safety or efficiency.

保罗将这种情况与有关电梯等共享空间礼仪的社会规范进行了类比，他认为，仅仅因为一个人提倡礼貌行为，并不意味着他们拒绝安全或效率等其他优先事项。

Gaevoy rebutted, emphasizing that the core functionality should trump less critical social preferences. He responded to Paul with a metaphor about optimizing elevators, “So the best elevators are the ones that don’t have farting people in them?” suggesting that focusing on minor issues like elevator etiquette over more significant technical characteristics could be misplaced.

Gaevoy 反驳道，强调核心功能应该胜过不太重要的社会偏好。他用一个关于优化电梯的比喻来回应保罗，“那么最好的电梯就是那些里面没有放屁的人的电梯？”这表明，关注电梯礼仪等次要问题而不是更重要的技术特征可能是错误的。

Fiskantes, co-founder of Zee Prime Capital, elaborated on this metaphor, distinguishing between expressing a preference and redesigning systems around niche issues. He argued that stating a preference against sharing an elevator with a ‘farting person’ is vastly different from redesigning the elevator to specifically include anti-fart features, potentially at the expense of more critical functionalities like safety and speed.

Zee Prime Capital 联合创始人 Fiskantes 详细阐述了这个比喻，区分了表达偏好和围绕利基问题重新设计系统。他认为，反对与“放屁的人”共用电梯与重新设计电梯以专门包括防放屁功能有很大不同，这可能会牺牲安全和速度等更关键的功能。

Furthering the discourse, Mike van Rossum of Folkvant Trading defended the intentions of Ethereum's leaders. He highlighted that Adams and Buterin's critiques were not against capitalism per se but against trends within the crypto space that may not be sustainable or conducive to long-term progress.

为了进一步推动这一讨论，Folkvant Trading 的 Mike van Rossum 为以太坊领导人的意图进行了辩护。他强调，亚当斯和 Buterin 的批评并不是反对资本主义本身，而是反对加密货币领域内的趋势，这些趋势可能不可持续或不利于长期进步。

Van Rossum explained, “They both have a certain vision of crypto […] they just want to say ‘I don’t like this’, and that’s pretty much all they did,” suggesting a nuanced view that accommodates both capitalist frameworks and selective ideological stances.

Van Rossum 解释说，“他们都对加密货币有一定的愿景……他们只是想说‘我不喜欢这个’，而这几乎就是他们所做的一切，”这提出了一种微妙的观点，既适应了资本主义框架，也适应了选择性意识形态立场。

Gaevoy concluded the debate by clarifying his stance on the foundational principles of crypto projects. He stressed the importance of adopting capitalism not merely as an afterthought but as a central guiding principle.

Gaevoy 通过澄清他对加密项目基本原则的立场来结束辩论。他强调采用资本主义不仅是事后的想法，而且是中心指导原则的重要性。

He asserted, “If your key guiding principle is capitalism and then you make extra steps to make it less damaging – I’m all for it. If your guiding principle is, idk, ‘social justice’ or ‘only good things should be built’ and then you attach capitalism as an afterthought, that’s what I am against.”

他断言，“如果你的主要指导原则是资本主义，然后你采取额外的措施来减少它的破坏性——我完全赞成。如果你的指导原则是，我不知道，‘社会正义’或‘只应该建造美好的事物’，然后你把资本主义视为事后的想法，那就是我反对的。”

The debate underscores a critical junction for the crypto community, reflecting a broader ideological struggle about the direction and use of blockchain technology. As these discussions continue to unfold, they not only influence public perception but also shape the strategic decisions that will determine the future of Ethereum and similar blockchains.

这场辩论强调了加密社区的一个关键结合点，反映了关于区块链技术的方向和使用的更广泛的意识形态斗争。随着这些讨论的不断展开，它们不仅会影响公众的看法，还会影响决定以太坊和类似区块链未来的战略决策。

At press time, ETH trades at $3,682.

截至发稿时，ETH 交易价格为 3,682 美元。