比特币（BTC）开发人员正在争论删除当前为OP_Return函数设置的83字节限制的提案

比特币社区中有一场风暴，可能会导致另一个硬叉，这是近八年来的主要叉子。关于单个协议功能的技术辩论正在爆发成一场全面的意识形态战争。

Bitcoin developers are arguing over a proposal to remove the 83-byte limit currently set for the OP_RETURN function. This proposal, pull request 32359, has sparked a heated debate that could yet lead to a hard fork of the Bitcoin network.

比特币开发人员正在争论一项建议，以删除当前为OP_Return功能设置的83字节限制。该提案（拉请求32359）引发了激烈的辩论，这可能导致比特币网络的硬构叉。

The last time Bitcoin hard forked was in September 2017. Back then, a group of developers split from the main Bitcoin chain to create Bitcoin Cash after disagreements over protocol changes.

比特币硬派的最后一次是在2017年9月。当时，一群开发人员从主要的比特币链分开，在协议更改上分歧后创建比特币现金。

This time, a technical discussion on a single protocol feature has erupted into a full-blown ideological war. Any change will either align Bitcoin with Satoshi Nakamoto’s vision as a financial layer or transform it into a general-purpose blockchain bloated with potentially useless files.

这次，关于单个协议功能的技术讨论已爆发为一场全面的意识形态战争。任何更改都将使比特币与Nakamoto的Satoshi Nakamoto作为财务层的愿景保持一致，或者将其转换为通用的区块链，并带有潜在无用的文件。

Since the activation of this data limit, Bitcoin transactions have been able to hold small amounts of non-financial data. For instance, Blockware Solutions's CEO, Charles Lee, had the idea for a data-encoding system that could be used to create a Bitcoin-based version of the popular online game Wordle.

由于该数据限制的激活，比特币交易能够持有少量的非财务数据。例如，Blockware Solutions的首席执行官Charles Lee拥有了一个数据编码系统的想法，该系统可用于创建流行的在线游戏Wordle的基于比特币的版本。

Now, a proposal aims to remove this limit, allowing files larger than 83 bytes to be embedded directly in Bitcoin transactions. This change would directly impact the size of the blockchain and node operations.

现在，一项建议旨在删除此限制，允许将大于83个字节的文件直接嵌入比特币交易中。这种更改将直接影响区块链和节点操作的大小。

The discussion has spiraled into a public spectacle, with supporters and opponents clashing, each adamant that their position is best for the network.

讨论已经陷入了公众的奇观，支持者和对手发生冲突，每个人都坚称他们的位置最适合网络。

One group, which includes Bitcoin core developer Luke Dashjr, is vehemently against removing the 83-byte limit. They argue that it would encourage users to embed large files in transactions, rendering the network sluggish and inefficient.

包括比特币核心开发人员Luke Dashjr在内的一个组强烈反对删除83字节的限制。他们认为，它将鼓励用户将大文件嵌入交易中，从而使网络缓慢而效率低下。

“It didn't used to be this way – the devs just instinctively knew, you don't use Bitcoin for arbitrary file storage and you do everything you can to make Bitcoin awkward to use for that purpose. You don't lay out the red carpet for scamcoin migrants from ETH-land,” one user wrote in agreement with Dashjr.

“开发人员本能地知道，开发人员不使用比特币进行任意文件存储，您可以尽一切努力使比特币尴尬地用于此目的。

Meanwhile, another group, including Chaincode Labs's Peter Todd and Antoine Poinsot, believes that the 83-byte restriction is no longer relevant in the post-Taproot era.

同时，包括Chaincode Labs的Peter Todd和Antoine Pooinsot在内的另一个小组认为，在磁带后时代，83个字节限制不再相关。

After the introduction of the new scripting language, Blockware Labs's researchers developed a method for tokenizing any asset on-chain using the new capabilities.

引入新的脚本语言后，Blockware Labs的研究人员开发了一种使用新功能来对任何链子进行链接的方法。

This group also points out that private mempool broadcasting providers, such as MARA Slipstream, already allow larger files to be stored on-chain.

该小组还指出，诸如Mara Slipstream之类的私人Mempool广播提供商已经允许在链上存储较大的文件。

In a post on X, Todd stated that the limit makes Bitcoin “less efficient” and that lifting it would restructure OP_RETURN’s full-fee structure.

托德在X上的一篇文章中指出，极限使比特币“效率较低”，并且提起它将重组OP_Return的全部费用结构。

“Your use of the software is giving the attackers the power to carry out their attack. Remove that power.” Knots still relays “spam” transactions…in blocks.

“您对软件的使用正在赋予攻击者进行攻击的力量。删除该功能。”结仍然中继“垃圾邮件”交易……块。

If @LukeDashjr and the rest of the Knots crew really want to do something worthwhile, they should propose a soft fork,…”

如果@lukedashjr和其余的打结船员真的想做一些值得做的事情，他们应该提出一个柔软的叉子……”

Another core developer, Jason Hughes, expressed his frustration, adding that despite the community’s opinion, the proposal will likely be merged.

另一位核心开发商杰森·休斯（Jason Hughes）表示沮丧，并补充说，尽管有社区的意见，但该提议可能会合并。

“We're about to merge a change that turns Bitcoin into a worthless altcoin, and no one seems to care to do anything about it. I've voiced objections, lost sleep over this, and despite clear community rejection of the PR it's moving.”

“我们将要合并一个变化，将比特币变成一文不值的山寨币，似乎没人在意做任何事情。我发表了反对意见，对此感到失去睡眠，尽管社区明显地拒绝了它正在移动的PR。”

This group urges the community to enforce strict regulations to preserve Bitcoin’s core purpose.

该小组敦促社区执行严格的法规，以保护比特币的核心目的。

“We should be making it harder to do anything other than use Bitcoin as a small-value, high-throughput chain. Not removing limits and making it easier to do things that are not useful for Bitcoin’s core purpose.”

“除了将比特币用作一个小价值，高通量链外，我们应该更难做任何其他事情。不要删除极限，也可以更容易地完成对比特币核心目的无用的事情。”