非当事人意见陈述反对龙卷风现金开发商的起诉

在 Roman Storm 因涉嫌参与 Tornado Cash 被捕期间，支持加密货币的组织纷纷为他辩护。 Coin Center、区块链协会和 DeFi 教育基金已提交非当事人意见陈述，对政府的指控提出异议。他们反对将 Tornado Cash 归类为未注册的汇款业务，并强调开发者对用户资产缺乏控制。这些简报引发了人们的担忧，即如果法院站在政府一边，软件开发人员可能会因第三方使用其代码的行为而被定为刑事犯罪，这会对软件开发人员产生更广泛的影响。

Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Tornado Cash Developer Roman Storm

提交支持 Tornado Cash 开发商 Roman Storm 的非当事人意见陈述

Amidst the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding Roman Storm, the developer behind the Ethereum privacy protocol Tornado Cash, several prominent pro-cryptocurrency organizations have submitted amicus briefs in support of his defense. These briefs present a formidable challenge to the government's characterization of Tornado Cash and the implications it may have for software developers.

在围绕以太坊隐私协议 Tornado Cash 背后的开发商 Roman Storm 正在进行的法律诉讼中，几个著名的支持加密货币的组织已提交了非当事人意见陈述以支持他的辩护。这些简报对政府对龙卷风现金的描述及其对软件开发商可能产生的影响提出了巨大的挑战。

Roman Semenov, another co-founder of Tornado Cash, remains at large, while Alexey Pertsev awaits the verdict of his trial in the Netherlands. The amicus briefs filed by Coin Center, the Blockchain Association, and the DeFi Education Fund provide a comprehensive critique of the charges against Storm.

Tornado Cash 的另一位联合创始人罗曼·谢苗诺夫 (Roman Semenov) 仍然在逃，而阿列克谢·佩尔采夫 (Alexey Pertsev) 正在荷兰等待审判结果。 Coin Center、区块链协会和 DeFi 教育基金提交的法庭之友陈述对 Storm 的指控进行了全面批评。

Challenging the Government's Characterization

挑战政府的定性

A central argument put forward by the amicus briefs is the government's misinterpretation of Tornado Cash as an unregistered money-transmitting business (MSB). The organizations contend that this characterization is inconsistent with existing regulations and fails to accurately represent the technical operation of the platform.

法庭之友陈述提出的一个核心论点是政府将 Tornado Cash 误解为未注册的汇款企业 (MSB)。这些组织认为，这种描述不符合现有法规，并且无法准确反映平台的技术运行情况。

The briefs assert that Tornado Cash functions as a decentralized software tool that facilitates anonymous transactions on the Ethereum blockchain. The developers of the platform do not have direct control over user assets, which are instead managed by smart contracts.

简报称，Tornado Cash 是一种去中心化软件工具，可促进以太坊区块链上的匿名交易。该平台的开发者无法直接控制用户资产，而是由智能合约管理。

Implications for Software Developers

对软件开发人员的影响

The briefs warn of the far-reaching implications for software developers if the government's characterization of Tornado Cash is upheld. They argue that such a precedent could render compliance with certain laws unfeasible for software creators.

简报警告说，如果政府对龙卷风现金的描述得到维持，将对软件开发商产生深远的影响。他们认为，这样的先例可能会使软件创建者无法遵守某些法律。

The Blockchain Association's brief, in particular, highlights the potential chilling effect on the development of anonymizing protocols, which play a vital role in preserving privacy and protecting users from surveillance.

区块链协会的简报特别强调了匿名协议开发的潜在寒蝉效应，匿名协议在保护隐私和保护用户免受监视方面发挥着至关重要的作用。

First Amendment Defense

第一修正案辩护

Coin Center's brief addresses the count of conspiracy to violate the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) by asserting a First Amendment defense. It argues that the software's release was not motivated by any intent to violate sanctions and that developers cannot be held liable for the subsequent misuse of their code by malicious actors.

Coin Center 的简报涉及通过主张第一修正案辩护来串谋违反《国际经济紧急权力法》(IEEPA) 的罪名。它认为，该软件的发布并不是出于任何违反制裁的意图，并且开发人员不能为恶意行为者随后滥用其代码承担责任。

To illustrate this point, Coin Center draws parallels with the open-source Linux operating system, arguing that software developers should not be implicated in sanction violations based on the actions of third parties.

为了说明这一点，Coin Center 将其与开源 Linux 操作系统进行了比较，认为软件开发人员不应因第三方的行为而受到制裁违规行为的牵连。

Criminalizing Software Developers

将软件开发人员定为刑事犯罪

The DeFi Education Fund's brief raises concerns about the potential criminalization of software developers for the actions of users. It warns that the broad interpretation of the government's charges could expose developers to liability for events that occur years after the software's release and over which they have no control.

DeFi 教育基金的简报引发了人们对软件开发者可能因用户行为而被定罪的担忧。它警告说，对政府指控的宽泛解释可能会让开发者对软件发布数年后发生的事件承担责任，而这些事件是他们无法控制的。

The brief emphasizes the need for a limiting principle that would protect software developers from open-ended prosecution.

该简报强调需要制定限制原则，以保护软件开发人员免受无限制的起诉。

Conclusion

结论

The amicus briefs filed by these pro-cryptocurrency organizations provide a robust defense of Roman Storm and challenge the government's portrayal of Tornado Cash. They underscore the importance of protecting software developers from overbroad interpretations of the law and preserving the fundamental principles of privacy and innovation in the digital age.

这些支持加密货币的组织提交的非当事人意见陈述为罗马风暴提供了强有力的辩护，并挑战了政府对龙卷风现金的描述。他们强调了保护软件开发人员免受对法律过于宽泛的解释以及维护数字时代隐私和创新基本原则的重要性。