特朗普紀念物承諾與總統舉行晚宴，引起了利益衝突的關注

從一開始，特朗普成人的崛起就發生了前所未有的政治轉變。有影響力的參議員現在正在向白宮質疑這種加密貨幣的含義。

Right from the start, the rise of the TRUMP memecoin took an unprecedented political turn. Influential senators are now questioning the White House about the implications of this crypto. They denounce the very idea of a “gala dinner” reserved for the largest holders. This practice raises serious doubts. It could well blur the line between private interests and public duties. Through this controversy, crypto becomes both a lever of power and a tool of dispute.

從一開始，特朗普成人的崛起就發生了前所未有的政治轉變。有影響力的參議員現在正在向白宮質疑這種加密貨幣的含義。他們譴責為最大持有人保留的“晚餐”的想法。這種做法引起了嚴重的懷疑。它很可能模糊了私人利益和公共職責之間的界限。通過這一爭議，加密既成為權力的槓桿，又是爭議工具。

Ethical and Legislative Stakes of the TRUMP Crypto

特朗普加密貨幣的道德和立法利益

The announcement of privileged access to the presidency in exchange for investment in a private company directly breaches federal anti-corruption laws. By promising such a privilege, it flirts with the emoluments clause of the Constitution. This provision prohibits the president from receiving gifts or titles of nobility from foreign powers without the agreement of the Congress. Here, the currency is digital. But the principle remains: an advantage offered in exchange for an amount in the TRUMP crypto and not in bitcoin.

宣布特權訪問總統的消息以換取對一家私人公司的投資直接違反聯邦反腐敗法。通過承諾這種特權，它與《憲法》的《埃米爾》條款調情。這項規定禁止總統在不同意國會同意的情況下從外國大國那裡獲得禮物或貴族頭銜。在這裡，貨幣是數字的。但是原則仍然存在：為換取特朗普加密貨幣而不是比特幣提供的優勢。

Thus, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Senator Adam Schiff have demanded clarifications from the Office of Government Ethics. They point to the risk of foreign influence. An unidentified actor could acquire cryptos and, through this, a voice with the president. The crypto veil is not enough to ensure transparency. On the contrary, it increases the need for safeguards.

因此，參議員伊麗莎白·沃倫（Elizabeth Warren）和參議員亞當·希夫（Adam Schiff）要求政府道德辦公室澄清。他們指出了外國影響的風險。一個身份不明的演員可以收購加密貨幣，並通過此聲音與總統發出聲音。加密面紗不足以確保透明度。相反，它增加了對保障措施的需求。

Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is under pressure. Warren has already urged its chairman to protect the integrity of financial oversight. The SEC’s independence from the White House is crucial.

此外，美國證券交易委員會（SEC）處於壓力下。沃倫（Warren）已經敦促其主席保護財務監督的完整性。 SEC遠離白宮的獨立性至關重要。

Without robust safeguards, the TRUMP crypto could become a case study in conflict of interest. At a time when digital asset regulation remains embryonic, this “transparency test” takes on an unprecedented dimension.

如果沒有強大的保障措施，特朗普加密貨幣可能會成為利益衝突的案例研究。在數字資產調節保持胚胎時，這種“透明度測試”具有前所未有的維度。

Geopolitical Risks and Influence Maneuvers

地緣政治風險並影響動作

Beyond the legal framework, this memecoin intertwines with contemporary geopolitical issues. Crypto has already been used as a channel for disinformation campaigns and covert financing. Here, the “gala dinner” could attract foreign investors seeking influence. From then on, the American political scene faces a form of vulnerability. It is exposed to hybrid tactics never seen at this scale.

除了法律框架之外，這一模因與當代地緣政治問題交織在一起。加密已被用作虛假宣傳活動和秘密融資的渠道。在這裡，“晚餐”可以吸引尋求影響力的外國投資者。從那時起，美國政治舞檯面臨著一種脆弱性。它暴露於從未見過的混合策略。

Secondly, the customization of the blockchain for a political project marks a break. TRUMP tokens circulate in a global ecosystem: their popularity transcends partisan divides. Some see it as a financial gimmick. Others fear a backdoor for Erdogan, Putin, or Xi Jinping. No player wants to admit that the blockchain could serve as a diplomatic Trojan horse.

其次，區塊鍊為一個政治項目的定制標誌著休息。特朗普令牌在全球生態系統中流傳：它們的受歡迎程度超越了黨派分歧。有些人將其視為財務頭。其他人則擔心Erdogan，Putin或XI Jinping的後門。沒有玩家願意承認區塊鏈可以用作外交特洛伊木馬。

Finally, this affair illustrates the growing permeability between social networks, presidential communication, and the decentralized financial market. Trump, master of theatricality, uses crypto codes to galvanize his base.

最後，這件事說明了社交網絡，總統交流和分散金融市場之間的滲透性日益增長。戲劇大師特朗普使用加密守則來激發他的基礎。

But in return, he opens a breach. This could be exploited to steer American policy according to economic or strategic interests. At a time when democracies struggle to define a common framework for digital regulation, this episode raises the question: who, really, profits from this new crypto-political era with bitcoin as a state asset?

但是作為回報，他打開了違規。可以根據經濟或戰略利益將其利用為美國政策。在民主國家努力為數字法規定義一個共同的框架時，這一集提出了一個問題：誰，誰真正從這個新的加密政治時代中獲利，比特幣是國家資產？

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.

通過我們的“閱讀賺取”計劃最大化您的共同成員體驗！對於您閱讀的每篇文章，請賺取積分並獲得獨家獎勵。立即註冊並開始賺取福利。

Fascinated by Bitcoin since 2017, Evariste has continuously researched the subject. While his initial interest was in trading, he now actively seeks to understand all advances centered on cryptocurrencies. As an editor, he strives to consistently deliver high-quality work that reflects the state of the sector as a whole.

自2017年以來，Evariste著迷於比特幣，不斷研究該主題。儘管他最初的興趣是交易，但他現在積極尋求了解以加密貨幣為中心的所有進步。作為一名編輯，他努力始終如一地提供反映整個行業狀態的高質量工作。