Stablecoin交易界正在迅速發展，而新數據則令人驚訝地了解瞭如何採用各種區塊鍊網絡來傳輸價值。

值得注意的是，儘管以太坊和Tron繼續履行主要網絡和基礎架構提供商的作用，但諸如Mantle和Sui之類的新實體正在迅速區分自己，尤其是當考慮普通的Stablecoin交易規模時。

The world of stablecoin transactions is quickly changing, and new data offers a surprising look at how various blockchain networks are being employed to transfer value.

Stablecoin交易的世界正在迅速發生變化，新數據令人驚訝地了解瞭如何採用各種區塊鍊網絡來傳輸價值。

While Ethereum and Tron continue to fulfill the roles of primary network and infrastructure providers, respectively, newer entities such as Mantle and Sui are quickly distinguishing themselves, especially when average stablecoin transaction sizes are considered.

儘管以太坊和Tron繼續履行主要網絡和基礎架構提供商的作用，但諸如Mantle和Sui之類的新實體正在迅速區分自己，尤其是當考慮普通的Stablecoin交易規模時。

Stablecoin adoption keeps on expanding, recently reported statistics from CrytoRank and SentoraHQ state. However, while each network is clearly making strides, the CryptoRank and SentoraHQ reports highlight that these networks are doing so in different ways. Some show more strength in transaction volume. Others show more strength in transfer size. Still, others show strength in user base, which in this case is represented by the number of user addresses.

Crytorank和Sontorahq州的統計數據最近報導了Stablecoin的採用一直在擴大。但是，雖然每個網絡顯然正在大步發展，但Cryptorank和Sentorahq報告強調說這些網絡正在以不同的方式進行。有些在交易量中顯示出更大的強度。其他人在轉移尺寸上顯示出更大的力量。儘管如此，其他人仍顯示出用戶群中的力量，在這種情況下，用戶地址數量表示。

Ethereum Leads in Transfer Size, Base and Tron in Pursuit

以太坊的轉移大小，基礎和Tron的領先

According to the latest report from CryptoRank, Ethereum is still heading the pack in terms of average stablecoin transaction size. The network registers a stunning average of $68,000 per transaction, which places it heads and shoulders above the other networks in this regard. That figure suggests that Ethereum is still very much the layer-1 network of choice for high-value users, institutions, and DeFi protocols.

根據Cryptorank的最新報告，以太坊仍以平均穩定交易規模為首。該網絡每筆交易的平均價格為68,000美元，在這方面將其頭部和肩膀置於其他網絡之上。該數字表明，以太坊仍然是高價值用戶，機構和DEFI協議的首選層網絡。

Following closely behind is Base, a Layer 2 solution developed by Coinbase. It has managed to secure a strong place in the market with an average transaction size of $20,000, which is quite incredible for a relatively new solution. Tron, which is best known for its ultra-low transaction fees and efficiency, ranks next with an average of $8,900 in stablecoin transfers.

緊隨其後的是基座，這是由Coinbase開發的2層解決方案。它設法以平均交易規模為20,000美元，在市場上獲得了強大的地位，這對於一個相對較新的解決方案來說是令人難以置信的。特隆（Tron）以其超低交易費用和效率而聞名，接下來是平均為8,900美元的Stablecoin Transfers。

Mantle and Sui lead in stablecoins transaction size

穩定性交易大小的地幔和SUI鉛

Ethereum is still leading the way with an average stablecoin transaction size of $68K. @base is in second place with $20K in average transaction size, while Tron follows with $8.9K.

以太坊仍處於平均穩定交易量為68K美元的情況下，仍處於領先地位。 @Base排名第二，平均交易規模為20,000美元，而Tron的價格為8.9k美元。

What’s really interesting is that Mantle and Sui are quickly catching up. Mantle's average transaction size is $6.8K, and Sui's is $5.8K, which puts them ahead of Optimism and Arbitrum. This is surprising because Optimism and Arbitrum are usually the main focus for scaling solutions on Ethereum.

真正有趣的是，地幔和Sui迅速追趕。 Mantle的平均交易規模為$ 6.8K，Sui's為5.8K，這使他們領先於樂觀和仲裁。這是令人驚訝的，因為樂觀和仲裁通常是將解決方案擴展到以太坊的主要重點。

Those figures are noteworthy because they highlight how different blockchain networks are catering to diverse user behaviors and preferences. For instance, Tron's vast user base and unmatched volume of $623.9 billion in the past 30 days, as reported by SentoraHQ, are a testament to its role in facilitating a high volume of smaller transactions, particularly in emerging markets where lower transaction fees are crucial.

這些數字值得注意，因為它們突出了不同的區塊鍊網絡如何迎合各種用戶行為和偏好。例如，Sonorahq的報導，Tron的龐大用戶群和​​過去30天無與倫比的6239億美元的無與倫比的銷量證明了其在促進大量較小交易中的作用，尤其是在較低交易費用至關重要的新興市場中。

On the other hand, Ethereum's transactions are typically larger in size, reflecting its role in facilitating institutional-grade transactions and DeFi activity, which usually involve more significant sums of money. This is also supported by the fact that 75% of the active USDT addresses are on Tron, highlighting its strength in terms of user footprint.

另一方面，以太坊的交易的規模通常更大，這反映了其在促進機構交易和Fefi活動中的作用，這通常涉及更大的金錢。這一事實也支持了這一事實，即75％的活躍USDT地址在Tron上，強調了其在用戶足跡方面的強度。

The presence of decentralized finance platforms and their high-yield protocols could be leading to development of larger transaction volumes from active traders and institutions across both networks. Whether this influx of cash is sustainable or merely a flash in the pan remains to be seen.

分散的財務平台及其高收益協議的存在可能會導致兩個網絡中活躍交易者和機構的較大交易量的發展。這種現金的湧入是可持續的還是僅在鍋中閃爍的潮流還有待觀察。

Tron Dominates USDT Adoption with Unmatched Volume and User Base

特隆（Tron

While Ethereum may lead in value per transaction, Tron continues to be the dominant network in terms of total USDT volume and user adoption. According to the latest report from SentoraHQ, Tron has processed a staggering $623.9 billion in stablecoin volume over the past 30 days. This is a testament to its role as the preferred network for USDT transactions, especially in regions where low fees are critical.

儘管以太坊可能會導致每筆交易的價值，但就總數的總量和用戶採用而言，TRON仍然是主要網絡。根據Sentorahq的最新報告，Tron在過去30天內處理了驚人的6239億美元的Stablecoin量。這證明了其作為USDT交易的首選網絡的作用，尤其是在低費用至關重要的地區。

According to the latest report from SentoraHQ (previously IntoTheBlock), Tron is the most widely used network for USDT, having processed $623.9 Billion in volume in the past 30 days.

根據Sentorahq（以前的Intotheblock）的最新報告，Tron是USDT最廣泛使用的網絡，在過去30天內處理了6239億美元的數量。

This incredible statistic showcases Tron's dominant role in facilitating USDT transactions. It's also worth noting that Tron accommodates more than 57 million USDT addresses, which makes up over 75% of all active USDT addresses in the world. This colossal user base illustrates Tron’s exceptional standing as a network that’s friendly to retail transactions. More than any other network, Tron is a place where everyday payments, cross-border transactions, and peer-to-peer transfers—especially the kinds of transactions that developing markets carry out—take place.

這種令人難以置信的統計量展示了Tron在促進USDT交易中的主要作用。還值得注意的是，Tron可容納超過5700萬美元的地址，該地址佔全球所有活躍USDT地址的75％以上。這個巨大的用戶群說明了特隆作為對零售交易友好的網絡的出色地位。 TRON比任何其他網絡都更重要的是，日常付款，跨境交易和點對點轉移（尤其是發展市場開展的交易）。

The efficiency, high throughput, and minimal fees of Tron have made it the choice for speed and cost-effectiveness in the movement of stablecoins—especially in transactions outside the traditional banking system.

TRON的效率，高吞吐量和最低費用使其成為穩定穩定的速度和成本效益的選擇，尤其是在傳統銀行系統之外的交易中。

This new report from CryptoRank and the data from SentoraHQ offer a unique glimpse into the diverse landscape of blockchain networks and how they're being utilized for different aspects of the crypto ecosystem. As the industry continues to evolve, it will be interesting

Cryptorank的這份新報告和Sentorahq的數據為區塊鍊網絡的各種景觀以及如何用於加密生態系統的不同方面提供了獨特的瞥見。隨著行業的不斷發展，這將是有趣的