軟體開發人員 Peter Todd 否認 HBO 紀錄片將他認定為比特幣創造者中本聰

托德表示擔心，由於與中本聰相關的巨額財富，這部紀錄片可能會危及他的生命。

Software developer Peter Todd has dismissed the HBO documentary identifying him as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin. Speaking to Bloomberg, Todd expressed concern that the documentary could endanger his life due to the vast amount of wealth associated with Satoshi Nakamoto.

軟體開發人員彼得·托德 (Peter Todd) 駁回了 HBO 的紀錄片，稱他是比特幣的創始人中本聰 (Satoshi Nakamoto)。托德在接受彭博社採訪時表示，他擔心這部紀錄片可能會危及他的生命，因為與中本聰相關的巨額財富。

However, two crypto industry experts argue that newer crypto users are less interested in the creator’s identity and are instead more concerned with the technology’s utility.

然而，兩位加密行業專家認為，新的加密用戶對創建者的身份不太感興趣，而是更關心該技術的實用性。

Software developer Peter Todd has dismissed the HBO documentary identifying him as Satoshi Nakamoto as a “marketing ploy” to promote filmmaker Cullen Hoback’s latest works. According to Todd, if Hoback had conducted thorough research, he would have reached a different conclusion.

軟體開發人員彼得·托德(Peter Todd) 駁斥了HBO 紀錄片將他稱為中本聰(Satoshi Nakamoto) 的說法，稱其為宣傳電影製片人卡倫·霍巴克(Cullen Hoback) 最新作品的“營銷策略」。托德表示，如果霍巴克進行了徹底的研究，他會得出不同的結論。

“If he had actually done any research at all, he would have come to a different conclusion. But I guess that wouldn’t have been as good for his marketing ploy for his movie and his book,” Todd stated.

「如果他真的做了任何研究，他會得出不同的結論。但我想這對他的電影和書的營銷策略來說不會那麼好，」托德說。

Todd’s latest remarks dismissing “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery,” echo those of the crypto community, who have widely criticized Hoback’s documentary assertions. Some Bitcoiners have even accused the filmmaker of producing a documentary that fell short of basic journalistic standards.

托德的最新言論駁斥了“貨幣電力：比特幣之謎”，這與加密貨幣社區的言論相呼應，他們廣泛批評了霍巴克的紀錄片主張。一些比特幣支持者甚至指責電影製片人製作的紀錄片不符合基本的新聞標準。

In new remarks, Todd expressed concern that the documentary could endanger his life.

托德在新的言論中表示擔心這部紀錄片可能危及他的生命。

“Obviously, falsely accusing someone of having tens of billions of dollars puts them at risk of robbery and kidnappings. He’s putting my life at risk to promote his movie,” Todd said.

「顯然，錯誤地指控某人擁有數百億美元會使他們面臨搶劫和綁架的風險。他冒著生命危險來宣傳他的電影，」托德說。

Some crypto industry veterans have stated that unraveling the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto could have significant market implications. However, Alex Momot, founder and CEO of Peanut Trade, argues that these fears are unfounded, as Nakamoto likely understood the risks and took appropriate precautions.

一些加密產業資深人士表示，揭開中本聰的神秘面紗可能會產生重大的市場影響。然而，Peanut Trade 創辦人兼執行長 Alex Momot 認為，這些擔憂是沒有根據的，因為中本聰可能了解風險並採取了適當的預防措施。

“I think it’s unlikely that revealing Satoshi’s identity would have any drastic effect on the price of BTC,” Momot said.

「我認為揭露中本聰的身份不太可能對比特幣的價格產生任何重大影響，」莫莫特說。

Momot acknowledges that many people will remain curious about the Bitcoin creator’s identity, citing human nature.

莫莫特承認，出於人性的原因，許多人仍然對比特幣創造者的身份感到好奇。

“Nonetheless, many people will continue to wonder about the creator’s identity because people are naturally drawn to mysteries and want to know the truth behind them. There are numerous conspiracy theories surrounding this topic, including the idea that intelligence agencies may have been involved,” Momot argued, adding that the assumption of Nakamoto’s passing seems more plausible.

「儘管如此，許多人仍會好奇創作者的身份，因為人們自然會被神秘事物所吸引，並想知道背後的真相。圍繞這個主題有很多陰謀論，包括情報機構可能參與其中的想法，」莫莫特辯稱，並補充說中本聰去世的假設似乎更合理。

“The assumption that Satoshi is no longer with us seems more plausible, given the lack of activity for over a decade and the vast amount of BTC that has remained untouched in his wallet,” he said.

他說：“考慮到十多年來缺乏活動，而且他錢包裡有大量比特幣沒有動過，中本聰不再和我們在一起的假設似乎更合理。”

New Crypto Users Prioritize Technology’s Utility

新的加密貨幣用戶優先考慮技術的實用性

Ivan Manchev, head of marketing at Ambire, suggested that the enduring speculation about the Bitcoin creator’s identity reflects the profound significance of the cryptocurrency for humanity.

Ambire 行銷主管 Ivan Manchev 表示，對比特幣創造者身分的持續猜測反映了加密貨幣對人類的深遠意義。

“When asked about the seemingly obsessive pursuit to unmask the Bitcoin creator, Manchev said:

「當被問及似乎沉迷於揭露比特幣創造者的真相時，曼切夫說：

“Throughout history, we’ve seen figures like Banksy symbolize rebellion against societal norms, and Shakespeare represents artistic genius. In this sense, Satoshi represents financial freedom and was born as a remedy for one of the biggest financial catastrophes of our time. It’s not hard to turn the story into a cult.

「縱觀歷史，我們看到像班克斯這樣的人物象徵著對社會規範的反叛，而莎士比亞則代表著藝術天才。從這個意義上說，中本聰代表著財務自由，它的誕生是為了解決我們這個時代最大的財務災難之一。把這個故事變成邪教並不難。

Both Manchev and Momot agreed that, unlike early crypto adopters, newer users are less interested in the identity of Bitcoin’s creator. These users, like those of any other emerging technology, are more focused on the technology’s utility than its origins. Only those professionally involved in the industry are likely to maintain a strong interest in who launched Bitcoin.

曼切夫和莫莫特都同意，與早期的加密貨幣採用者不同，新用戶對比特幣創造者的身份不太感興趣。與其他新興技術的用戶一樣，這些用戶更關注技術的實用性而不是其起源。只有那些專業從事該行業的人才可能對誰推出了比特幣保持濃厚的興趣。

“I think the identity of Satoshi is less interesting to newer crypto users, who are more concerned with the technology’s utility and potential to disrupt traditional financial systems,” Manchev said.

曼切夫說：“我認為中本聰的身份對於新的加密貨幣用戶來說不太感興趣，他們更關心該技術的實用性和破壞傳統金融系統的潛力。”

“Those who join the crypto space later on tend to be less interested in uncovering Satoshi’s identity and are instead more concerned with the technology’s capability to improve their lives. Only a small group of people, particularly those working in the crypto industry, will continue to have a strong interest in who launched Bitcoin,” Momot added.

「那些後來加入加密貨幣領域的人往往對揭露中本聰的身份不太感興趣，而是更關心該技術改善他們生活的能力。只有一小部分人，特別是那些在加密貨幣行業工作的人，會繼續對誰推出了比特幣抱有濃厚的興趣，」莫莫特補充道。

What do you think about the remarks made by Todd, Momot, and Manchev? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

您如何看待托德、莫莫特和曼切夫的言論？在下面的評論部分分享您的想法。