软件开发人员 Peter Todd 否认 HBO 纪录片将他认定为比特币创造者中本聪

托德表示担心，由于与中本聪相关的巨额财富，这部纪录片可能会危及他的生命。

Software developer Peter Todd has dismissed the HBO documentary identifying him as Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin. Speaking to Bloomberg, Todd expressed concern that the documentary could endanger his life due to the vast amount of wealth associated with Satoshi Nakamoto.

软件开发人员彼得·托德 (Peter Todd) 驳回了 HBO 的纪录片，称他是比特币的创始人中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto)。托德在接受彭博社采访时表示，他担心这部纪录片可能会危及他的生命，因为与中本聪相关的巨额财富。

However, two crypto industry experts argue that newer crypto users are less interested in the creator’s identity and are instead more concerned with the technology’s utility.

然而，两位加密行业专家认为，新的加密用户对创建者的身份不太感兴趣，而是更关心该技术的实用性。

Software developer Peter Todd has dismissed the HBO documentary identifying him as Satoshi Nakamoto as a “marketing ploy” to promote filmmaker Cullen Hoback’s latest works. According to Todd, if Hoback had conducted thorough research, he would have reached a different conclusion.

软件开发人员彼得·托德 (Peter Todd) 驳斥了 HBO 纪录片将他称为中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 的说法，称其为宣传电影制片人卡伦·霍巴克 (Cullen Hoback) 最新作品的“营销策略”。托德表示，如果霍巴克进行了彻底的研究，他会得出不同的结论。

“If he had actually done any research at all, he would have come to a different conclusion. But I guess that wouldn’t have been as good for his marketing ploy for his movie and his book,” Todd stated.

“如果他真的做了任何研究，他会得出不同的结论。但我想这对他的电影和书的营销策略来说不会那么好，”托德说。

Todd’s latest remarks dismissing “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery,” echo those of the crypto community, who have widely criticized Hoback’s documentary assertions. Some Bitcoiners have even accused the filmmaker of producing a documentary that fell short of basic journalistic standards.

托德的最新言论驳斥了“货币电力：比特币之谜”，这与加密货币社区的言论相呼应，他们广泛批评了霍巴克的纪录片断言。一些比特币支持者甚至指责电影制片人制作的纪录片不符合基本的新闻标准。

In new remarks, Todd expressed concern that the documentary could endanger his life.

托德在新的言论中表示担心这部纪录片可能危及他的生命。

“Obviously, falsely accusing someone of having tens of billions of dollars puts them at risk of robbery and kidnappings. He’s putting my life at risk to promote his movie,” Todd said.

“显然，错误地指控某人拥有数百亿美元会使他们面临抢劫和绑架的风险。他冒着生命危险来宣传他的电影，”托德说。

Some crypto industry veterans have stated that unraveling the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto could have significant market implications. However, Alex Momot, founder and CEO of Peanut Trade, argues that these fears are unfounded, as Nakamoto likely understood the risks and took appropriate precautions.

一些加密行业资深人士表示，揭开中本聪的神秘面纱可能会产生重大的市场影响。然而，Peanut Trade 创始人兼首席执行官亚历克斯·莫莫特 (Alex Momot) 认为，这些担忧是没有根据的，因为中本聪可能了解风险并采取了适当的预防措施。

“I think it’s unlikely that revealing Satoshi’s identity would have any drastic effect on the price of BTC,” Momot said.

“我认为揭露中本聪的身份不太可能对比特币的价格产生任何重大影响，”莫莫特说。

Momot acknowledges that many people will remain curious about the Bitcoin creator’s identity, citing human nature.

莫莫特承认，出于人性的原因，许多人仍然对比特币创造者的身份感到好奇。

“Nonetheless, many people will continue to wonder about the creator’s identity because people are naturally drawn to mysteries and want to know the truth behind them. There are numerous conspiracy theories surrounding this topic, including the idea that intelligence agencies may have been involved,” Momot argued, adding that the assumption of Nakamoto’s passing seems more plausible.

“尽管如此，许多人仍会好奇创作者的身份，因为人们自然会被神秘事物所吸引，并想知道其背后的真相。围绕这个话题有很多阴谋论，包括情报机构可能参与其中的想法，”莫莫特辩称，并补充说中本聪去世的假设似乎更合理。

“The assumption that Satoshi is no longer with us seems more plausible, given the lack of activity for over a decade and the vast amount of BTC that has remained untouched in his wallet,” he said.

他说：“考虑到十多年来缺乏活动，而且他钱包里有大量比特币没有动过，中本聪不再和我们在一起的假设似乎更合理。”

New Crypto Users Prioritize Technology’s Utility

新的加密货币用户优先考虑技术的实用性

Ivan Manchev, head of marketing at Ambire, suggested that the enduring speculation about the Bitcoin creator’s identity reflects the profound significance of the cryptocurrency for humanity.

Ambire 营销主管 Ivan Manchev 表示，对比特币创造者身份的持续猜测反映了加密货币对人类的深远意义。

“When asked about the seemingly obsessive pursuit to unmask the Bitcoin creator, Manchev said:

“当被问及似乎痴迷于揭露比特币创造者的真相时，曼切夫说：

“Throughout history, we’ve seen figures like Banksy symbolize rebellion against societal norms, and Shakespeare represents artistic genius. In this sense, Satoshi represents financial freedom and was born as a remedy for one of the biggest financial catastrophes of our time. It’s not hard to turn the story into a cult.

“纵观历史，我们看到像班克斯这样的人物象征着对社会规范的反叛，而莎士比亚则代表着艺术天才。从这个意义上说，中本聪代表着财务自由，它的诞生是为了解决我们这个时代最大的金融灾难之一。把这个故事变成邪教并不难。

Both Manchev and Momot agreed that, unlike early crypto adopters, newer users are less interested in the identity of Bitcoin’s creator. These users, like those of any other emerging technology, are more focused on the technology’s utility than its origins. Only those professionally involved in the industry are likely to maintain a strong interest in who launched Bitcoin.

曼切夫和莫莫特都同意，与早期的加密货币采用者不同，新用户对比特币创造者的身份不太感兴趣。与任何其他新兴技术的用户一样，这些用户更关注技术的实用性而不是其起源。只有那些专业从事该行业的人才可能对谁推出了比特币保持浓厚的兴趣。

“I think the identity of Satoshi is less interesting to newer crypto users, who are more concerned with the technology’s utility and potential to disrupt traditional financial systems,” Manchev said.

曼切夫说：“我认为中本聪的身份对于新的加密货币用户来说不太感兴趣，他们更关心该技术的实用性和破坏传统金融系统的潜力。”

“Those who join the crypto space later on tend to be less interested in uncovering Satoshi’s identity and are instead more concerned with the technology’s capability to improve their lives. Only a small group of people, particularly those working in the crypto industry, will continue to have a strong interest in who launched Bitcoin,” Momot added.

“那些后来加入加密货币领域的人往往对揭露中本聪的身份不太感兴趣，而是更关心该技术改善他们生活的能力。只有一小部分人，特别是那些在加密货币行业工作的人，会继续对谁推出了比特币抱有浓厚的兴趣，”莫莫特补充道。

What do you think about the remarks made by Todd, Momot, and Manchev? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

您如何看待托德、莫莫特和曼切夫的言论？在下面的评论部分分享您的想法。