紐約大學教授斯科特·加洛韋（Scott Galloway）週四詳細介紹了“跨國寡頭”

G. Galloway和CNN主持人安德森·庫珀（Anderson Cooper）正在討論特朗普$特朗普的犯罪硬幣，特朗普於1月17日釋放，這是他擔任美國第47任總統的三天前。

New York University professor Scott Galloway on Thursday discussed the $TRUMP cryptocurrency meme coin and argued that it’s fuelling a “transnational oligarchy” which is protected by “proximity” to President Donald Trump.

紐約大學教授斯科特·加洛韋（Scott Galloway）週四討論了特朗普的加密貨幣硬幣，並認為它助長了一個“跨國寡頭”，該寡頭受到“接近”唐納德·特朗普（Donald Trump）的保護。

Galloway and CNN host Anderson Cooper were discussing the meme coin, which Trump released on Jan. 17, three days before his inauguration as the 47th president of the United States.

蓋洛韋（Galloway）和美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）的主持人安德森·庫珀（Anderson Cooper）正在討論特朗普於1月17日釋放的模因硬幣，也就是他擔任美國第47任總統的三天前。

As Cooper noted, Trump’s meme coin “rose more than 60 percent on Wednesday” after the president offered “the most EXCLUSIVE INVITATION in the world” to the top 220 investors in his meme coin, Fox News reports.

正如庫珀指出的那樣，在總統向他的模因硬幣中前220名投資者提供“世界上最獨特的邀請”之後，特朗普的模因硬幣“週三上漲了60％以上”。

“The top 25 are further promised what's being billed as an exclusive reception with the president before dinner and a special VIP tour the following day,” Cooper reported.

庫珀報導：“進一步承諾將在晚餐前與總統的獨家招待會和第二天的特殊VIP巡迴演出一樣，進一步向前25名。”

Cooper, detailing the recent coin developments, asked Galloway if it’s “pay to play” to essentially offer access to the president based on meme coin purchases.

庫珀（Cooper）詳細介紹了最近的硬幣開發項目，詢問蓋洛韋（Galloway）是否“付費”是根據Meme Coin的購買而實質上提供與總統的訪問權限。

“We see it everywhere,” Galloway said, arguing the same is true for music festivals like Glastonbury and Coachella.

加洛韋說：“我們到處都看到它。

“But what we’ve never seen is that you can buy access like this to the president on this kind of scale, where essentially he's opened a Swiss banking account and whoever's put in the most money into that Swiss banking account gets invited to a dinner at one of his country clubs. The potential here for grift is just unprecedented. We've never seen anything like this.”

“但是我們從未見過的是，您可以在這種規模上購買這樣的訪問權限，從本質上講，他在那裡開了一個瑞士銀行帳戶，無論誰投入其中的人最多，瑞士銀行帳戶都會邀請他在他的一個鄉村俱樂部參加晚餐。在這裡，Grift的潛力只是前所未有的。我們從未見過這樣的東西。”

The NYU professor noted Trump “has increased his wealth approximately $175 million a week … or 700 million a month” via his meme coin.

紐約大學教授指出，特朗普“每週增加了大約1.75億美元的財富，每月7億美元”，這是他的模因硬幣。

“We’ve never seen anything like this. I think what this signifies is a lot of people have argued, correctly, with some veracity, that America has been for sale for a long time. There’s a lot of corruption in Washington. But we've never had the world for sale before. Just the potential here for corruption on a geopolitical global scale, we've never seen anything like this.”

“我們從未見過這樣的東西。我認為這意味著很多人以一定的真實性正確地爭論著，美國已經出售了很長時間了。華盛頓有很多腐敗。但是我們從來沒有出售過全世界。只是在地理政治規模上腐敗的潛力，我們從未見過這樣的東西，我們從來沒有看到過這樣的東西。”

“I also want to acknowledge that there's been grift on both sides,” Galloway later said. “I would argue that Democrats are corrupt for thousands or hundreds of thousands, and the president has decided to be corrupt for billions. So to a certain extent, you can admire that he's decided to be corrupt for a much greater dollar amount. This is just going to take the wealth of every almost every American down who doesn't have proximity to the president. This is corruption, and it makes us less wealthy.”

加洛韋後來說：“我也想承認雙方都有陷入困境。” “我認為民主黨人腐敗成千上萬，總統決定腐敗數十億美元。因此，在一定程度上，您可以欽佩他決定以更大的美元腐敗腐敗。這只是將幾乎每個美國的美國人都承擔的財富與總統不靠近的每一個美國人，這是腐敗的。

“To a certain extent, just the level of brazen hypocrisy here is just it's it's noxious. And I think it goes to a larger issue here … and that is I worry that there's a kind of an emerging cohort of what I call the 'transnational oligarchy' that can buy their own schooling, their own health care, their own rights. They're sort of, if you will, they're protected by the law, but they're not bound by it. Whereas the bottom 99 percent are bound by the law but no longer protected by it.

“在一定程度上，這裡的偽善程度僅僅是有害的。我認為這是一個更大的問題。這是一個更大的問題……我擔心，我擔心，我所說的“跨國寡頭統治”的群體是一種新出現的同齡人，可以從自己的權利，他們自己的權利，他們的權利。受法律的約束，但不再受其保護。

“And I believe that these transnational oligarchs who get their wealth from proximity to the president, don't have as vested interest in maintaining the Constitution or enforcing our Bill of Rights, because they essentially have their own democracy by virtue of their wealth, which separates them from the rest of us and creates a lack of fidelity to the Constitution.”

“而且我相信，這些跨國寡頭從接近總統的鄰近中獲得財富，對維持憲法或執行我們的權利法案沒有既得利益，因為它們本質上是通過自己的財富而擁有自己的民主，這使他們與其他人分開，並使他們缺乏忠誠的憲法。”