價值數百萬美元的曲線漏洞促使交易者轉向 Uniswap 的 UNI 代幣

在 Curve Finance 遭受 1 億美元的利用之後，交易者開始轉向 Uniswap 的 UNI 代幣，將 UNI 永續期貨的融資利率推至年化 19%。這次攻擊引發了市場情緒的轉變，交易員預計 Uniswap 的市場份額可能會增加。

Multi-Million Dollar Exploit on Curve Finance Spurs Traders to Uniswap's UNI Token

Curve Finance 上數百萬美元的漏洞促使交易者轉向 Uniswap 的 UNI 代幣

On Sunday, a multi-million dollar exploit targeted Curve Finance, a prominent decentralized exchange specializing in stablecoins. Following the incident, traders have shifted their focus towards Uniswap's UNI token, driving up funding rates for UNI perpetual futures.

週日，針對 Curve Finance 的一次價值數百萬美元的攻擊，這是一家專門從事穩定幣的著名去中心化交易所。事件發生後，交易者將注意力轉向 Uniswap 的 UNI 代幣，推高了 UNI 永續期貨的資金費率。

Data from Matrixport, a provider of crypto services, reveals a surge in funding rates to an annualized 19% for perpetual futures linked to UNI. Positive funding rates indicate that the price of the perpetual contract is trading at a premium compared to the mark price, which represents the estimated true value of a contract. This also implies that long positions, or traders holding leveraged buy positions, are prevalent and willing to pay short positions to maintain their positions.

加密服務供應商 Matrixport 的數據顯示，與 UNI 掛鉤的永續期貨的年化融資費率飆升至 19%。正的資金費率表示永續合約的價格相對於標記價格（代表合約的估計真實價值）有溢價。這也意味著多頭頭寸或持有槓桿買入頭寸的交易者很普遍，並且願意支付空頭頭寸來維持其頭寸。

Markus Thielen, Head of Research and Strategy at Matrixport, explained in an email, "The UNI token perpetuals are trading at almost a 20% premium as traders anticipate Uniswap gaining a larger market share following the CRV exploit."

Matrixport 研究和策略主管 Markus Thielen 在一封電子郵件中解釋說：“UNI 代幣永續合約的交易價格幾乎溢價 20%，因為交易者預計 Uniswap 在 CRV 漏洞利用後將獲得更大的市場份額。”

The exploit on Curve, the third-largest DEX by trading volume, resulted in a potential loss of $100 million worth of cryptocurrency. The native CRV token of Curve DAO experienced a steep decline of over 15% to $0.63 after the attack. This sharp drop heightened the risk of potential liquidations for borrowed positions, including a significant holding by Curve's founder.

以交易量計算第三大去中心化交易所 Curve 的漏洞可能導致價值 1 億美元的加密貨幣損失。攻擊後，Curve DAO 的原生 CRV 代幣暴跌超過 15%，至 0.63 美元。這種急劇下跌增加了借入部位的潛在清算風險，其中包括 Curve 創辦人大量持有的部位。

Despite the exploit, the perpetual futures market has shown no signs of panic. Funding rates in CRV and AAVE markets remain positive, indicating that traders are adapting to the situation rather than resorting to shorting the token.

儘管存在這種漏洞，永續合約市場並沒有表現出恐慌的跡象。 CRV 和 AAVE 市場的資金利率仍然為正，表明交易者正在適應這種情況，而不是訴諸做空代幣。

"CRV DAO perp futures are still trading at a small premium, suggesting that traders are primarily focused on shifting positions away from the DEX in terms of total value locked (TVL) rather than shorting the token," Thielen said.

Thielen 表示：“CRV DAO 永續期貨的交易價格仍存在小幅溢價，這表明交易者主要關注的是在鎖定總價值 (TVL) 方面將頭寸從 DEX 轉移出去，而不是做空該代幣。”

According to DeFiLlama, a data source for decentralized finance, the TVL in Curve Finance plummeted from $3.2 billion to $1.8 billion post-hack. In contrast, Uniswap's TVL remained stable at approximately $3.8 billion, while AAVE's declined from $5.85 billion to $5.37 billion.

根據去中心化金融資料來源 DeFiLlama 的數據，Curve Finance 的 TVL 在駭客攻擊後從 32 億美元暴跌至 18 億美元。相較之下，Uniswap 的 TVL 保持穩定在約 38 億美元，而 AAVE 的 TVL 從 58.5 億美元下降至 53.7 億美元。

The exploit on Curve Finance has highlighted the potential vulnerabilities associated with decentralized exchanges and the importance of robust security measures. The market reaction, with traders pivoting towards Uniswap's UNI token, demonstrates the competitive nature of the DEX landscape and the constant evolution within the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

Curve Finance 的漏洞凸顯了與去中心化交易所相關的潛在漏洞以及強而有力的安全措施的重要性。交易者轉向 Uniswap 的 UNI 代幣的市場反應表明了 DEX 格局的競爭本質以及加密貨幣生態系統內的不斷演變。