MEXC是否操縱KAS價格？頂級Kaspa分析師警告

Kaspa分析師Kaspa Daily再次向MEXC上的可疑活動發出警報。交易所可能會人為地誇大KAS的價格。

Kaspa analyst Kaspa Daily is once again raising concerns over suspicious activity on MEXC. In a recent post, the analyst noted that KAS is trading at a higher price on MEXC compared to other major exchanges like Bybit and Gate.io. This consistent price difference, especially during periods of low arbitrage flow, is raising eyebrows in the Kaspa community.

Kaspa分析師Kaspa Daily再次引起了人們對MEXC的可疑活動的擔憂。分析師在最近的一篇文章中指出，與Bybit和Gate.io（例如其他主要交易所）相比，KAS的MEXC價格更高。這種一致的價格差異，尤其是在低套利流量時期，正在引起卡巴社區的眉毛。

Several possible reasons for this price gap on MEXC have been discussed. It could be due to a liquidity imbalance on the exchange, as there might not be enough Kaspa available for sale, naturally driving up the KAS price.

討論了MEXC價格差距的幾個可能原因。這可能是由於交易所流動性失衡所致，因為可能沒有足夠的Kaspa出售，因此自然會提高KAS價格。

Another factor could be the withdrawal issues that MEXC is frequently facing. Users have reported slow or completely frozen Kaspa withdrawals, which might force traders to buy and sell within the platform, especially when considering the significant price discrepancies between exchanges.

另一個因素可能是MEXC經常面臨的提款問題。用戶報告說，較慢或完全冷凍的Kaspa提款，這可能會迫使交易者在平台內買賣，尤其是在考慮交易所之間的重大價格差異時。

However, what's really concerning is the third point raised by Kaspa Daily: possible market manipulation. The analyst suggests that the lack of arbitrage flow and the persistent price premium could be signs of artificial price inflation. This could be an attempt to make Kaspa appear stronger or more in-demand than it really is, particularly on MEXC.

但是，真正令人擔憂的是Kaspa Daily提出的第三點：可能的市場操縱。分析師認為，缺乏套利流和持續價格溢價可能是人造價格通脹的跡象。這可能是一種試圖使Kaspa顯得比實際的更強或更強大的嘗試，尤其是在MEXC上。

This isn't the first time Kaspa watchers have brought up issues with MEXC's influence on the Kaspa price. Several incidents point to deeper issues. For instance, during a major KAS price rally, MEXC froze wallet operations just when demand was high. At the same time, Kaspa's daily active supply dropped by 85%, meaning traders couldn't move their KAS off the exchange. This left them stranded, unable to respond to market changes.

這不是Kaspa觀察者第一次提出MEXC對Kaspa價格的影響。幾起事件指出了更深層次的問題。例如，在大型KAS價格集會期間，MEXC凍結了在需求很高時凍結的錢包。同時，卡巴（Kaspa）每天的活躍供應量下降了85％，這意味著交易者無法將其KAS脫離交易所。這使他們陷入困境，無法應對市場變化。

Furthermore, activity in MEXC's order books shows large sell orders appearing precisely when the KAS price was rising. These orders weren't getting filled and seemed to vanish as quickly as they appeared, a behavior aligning with the tactic of spoofing. This technique involves traders placing significant orders they never intend to execute to exert pressure on the market and influence price movements.

此外，MEXC訂單書中的活動顯示，當KAS價格上漲時，大量賣出訂單正是出現的。這些訂單沒有被填補，似乎像出現一樣快地消失了，這種行為與欺騙的策略保持一致。這項技術涉及交易者下達他們從未打算執行的重要訂單以在市場上施加壓力並影響價格變動。

MEXC has also placed restrictions on withdrawals for extended periods, sometimes lasting over a week. While the exchange attributes this to wallet maintenance, many in the community find the timing suspicious. Such lengthy withdrawal freezes can significantly affect Kaspa's market liquidity and negatively impact trader confidence.

MEXC還對撤離的限制長期限制，有時持續一周。儘管交易所將其歸因於錢包維護，但社區中的許多人發現時機可疑。這種冗長的戒斷凍結會嚴重影響卡巴的市場流動性，並對交易者的信心產生負面影響。

MEXC has denied manipulating the Kaspa price, attributing all market movements to regular trading activity. In March 2024, the exchange even announced that it had identified and banned several trading groups involved in engaging in harmful practices like spoofing and self-trading. However, despite these claims, the evidence continues to pour in.

MEXC否認操縱Kaspa價格，將所有市場變動歸因於常規交易活動。 2024年3月，該交易所甚至宣布已確定並禁止了幾個參與從事有害行為的交易集團，例如欺騙和自我交易。但是，儘管有這些主張，但證據仍在繼續。

Independent observers and data analysts, including those at Kaspalytics, have documented concerning trends in their analysis. From the strategic placement of large orders to the prolonged holds on withdrawals, the actions appear coordinated and calculated.

獨立的觀察者和數據分析師，包括Kaspalytics的數據分析師，已經記錄了其分析中的趨勢。從大訂單的戰略安置到撤回的延長持有，這些動作似乎是協調的和計算的。

Kaspa Daily and other community members are urging traders to be extremely cautious when using MEXC for KAS trades, especially in light of the persistent price difference and the potential implications for fair market valuation.

Kaspa Daily和其他社區成員敦促交易者在使用MEXC進行KAS交易時非常謹慎，尤其是鑑於價格持續的價格差異以及對公平市場估值的潛在影響。

The Kaspa community is keeping a close eye on the situation as the question remains: is MEXC truly reflecting the real market value of KAS, or is something else at play in the skewed price trends on MEXC?

Kaspa社區正在密切關注這種情況，因為問題仍然存在：MEXC是真的反映了KAS的真正市場價值，還是在MEXC的偏斜價格趨勢中發揮了作用？