MEXC是否操纵KAS价格？顶级Kaspa分析师警告

Kaspa分析师Kaspa Daily再次向MEXC上的可疑活动发出警报。交易所可能会人为地夸大KAS的价格。

Kaspa analyst Kaspa Daily is once again raising concerns over suspicious activity on MEXC. In a recent post, the analyst noted that KAS is trading at a higher price on MEXC compared to other major exchanges like Bybit and Gate.io. This consistent price difference, especially during periods of low arbitrage flow, is raising eyebrows in the Kaspa community.

Kaspa分析师Kaspa Daily再次引起了人们对MEXC的可疑活动的担忧。分析师在最近的一篇文章中指出，与Bybit和Gate.io（例如其他主要交易所）相比，KAS的MEXC价格更高。这种一致的价格差异，尤其是在低套利流量时期，正在引起卡巴社区的眉毛。

Several possible reasons for this price gap on MEXC have been discussed. It could be due to a liquidity imbalance on the exchange, as there might not be enough Kaspa available for sale, naturally driving up the KAS price.

讨论了MEXC价格差距的几个可能原因。这可能是由于交易所流动性失衡所致，因为可能没有足够的Kaspa出售，因此自然会提高KAS价格。

Another factor could be the withdrawal issues that MEXC is frequently facing. Users have reported slow or completely frozen Kaspa withdrawals, which might force traders to buy and sell within the platform, especially when considering the significant price discrepancies between exchanges.

另一个因素可能是MEXC经常面临的提款问题。用户报告说，较慢或完全冷冻的Kaspa提款，这可能会迫使交易者在平台内买卖，尤其是在考虑交易所之间的重大价格差异时。

However, what's really concerning is the third point raised by Kaspa Daily: possible market manipulation. The analyst suggests that the lack of arbitrage flow and the persistent price premium could be signs of artificial price inflation. This could be an attempt to make Kaspa appear stronger or more in-demand than it really is, particularly on MEXC.

但是，真正令人担忧的是Kaspa Daily提出的第三点：可能的市场操纵。分析师认为，缺乏套利流和持续价格溢价可能是人造价格通胀的迹象。这可能是一种试图使Kaspa显得比实际的更强或更强大的尝试，尤其是在MEXC上。

This isn't the first time Kaspa watchers have brought up issues with MEXC's influence on the Kaspa price. Several incidents point to deeper issues. For instance, during a major KAS price rally, MEXC froze wallet operations just when demand was high. At the same time, Kaspa's daily active supply dropped by 85%, meaning traders couldn't move their KAS off the exchange. This left them stranded, unable to respond to market changes.

这不是Kaspa观察者第一次提出MEXC对Kaspa价格的影响。几起事件指出了更深层次的问题。例如，在大型KAS价格集会期间，MEXC冻结了在需求很高时冻结的钱包。同时，卡巴（Kaspa）每天的活跃供应量下降了85％，这意味着交易者无法将其KAS脱离交易所。这使他们陷入困境，无法应对市场变化。

Furthermore, activity in MEXC's order books shows large sell orders appearing precisely when the KAS price was rising. These orders weren't getting filled and seemed to vanish as quickly as they appeared, a behavior aligning with the tactic of spoofing. This technique involves traders placing significant orders they never intend to execute to exert pressure on the market and influence price movements.

此外，MEXC订单书中的活动显示，当KAS价格上涨时，大量卖出订单正是出现的。这些订单没有被填补，似乎像出现一样快地消失了，这种行为与欺骗的策略保持一致。这项技术涉及交易者下达他们从未打算执行的重要订单以在市场上施加压力并影响价格变动。

MEXC has also placed restrictions on withdrawals for extended periods, sometimes lasting over a week. While the exchange attributes this to wallet maintenance, many in the community find the timing suspicious. Such lengthy withdrawal freezes can significantly affect Kaspa's market liquidity and negatively impact trader confidence.

MEXC还对撤离的限制长期限制，有时持续一周。尽管交易所将其归因于钱包维护，但社区中的许多人发现时机可疑。这种冗长的戒断冻结会严重影响卡巴的市场流动性，并对交易者的信心产生负面影响。

MEXC has denied manipulating the Kaspa price, attributing all market movements to regular trading activity. In March 2024, the exchange even announced that it had identified and banned several trading groups involved in engaging in harmful practices like spoofing and self-trading. However, despite these claims, the evidence continues to pour in.

MEXC否认操纵Kaspa价格，将所有市场变动归因于常规交易活动。 2024年3月，该交易所甚至宣布已确定并禁止了几个参与从事有害行为的交易集团，例如欺骗和自我交易。但是，尽管有这些主张，但证据仍在继续。

Independent observers and data analysts, including those at Kaspalytics, have documented concerning trends in their analysis. From the strategic placement of large orders to the prolonged holds on withdrawals, the actions appear coordinated and calculated.

独立的观察者和数据分析师，包括Kaspalytics的数据分析师，已经记录了其分析中的趋势。从大订单的战略安置到撤回的延长持有，这些动作似乎是协调的和计算的。

Kaspa Daily and other community members are urging traders to be extremely cautious when using MEXC for KAS trades, especially in light of the persistent price difference and the potential implications for fair market valuation.

Kaspa Daily和其他社区成员敦促交易者在使用MEXC进行KAS交易时非常谨慎，尤其是鉴于价格持续的价格差异以及对公平市场估值的潜在影响。

The Kaspa community is keeping a close eye on the situation as the question remains: is MEXC truly reflecting the real market value of KAS, or is something else at play in the skewed price trends on MEXC?

Kaspa社区正在密切关注这种情况，因为问题仍然存在：MEXC是真的反映了KAS的真正市场价值，还是在MEXC的偏斜价格趋势中发挥了作用？