認識Sahil Arora - 加密人物的超級惡棍

將“超級惡棍”一詞周圍圍繞所有人而言，這可能有些不負責任。一位享有聲望的運動員會定期打破您的團隊及其忠實球迷的心？

It can be a little irresponsible to throw the term ‘super villain’ around all willy-nilly.

將“超級惡棍”一詞周圍圍繞所有人而言，這可能有些不負責任。

A prestigious athlete that regularly breaks the hearts of your team and its loyal fans? Absolutely fine. An ibis that lives across the road? ‘Super villain’ might not be strong enough of an adjective.

一位享有聲望的運動員會定期打破您的團隊及其忠實球迷的心？絕對很好。一個住在馬路對面的宜必省？ “超級惡棍”可能不夠強大。

But what about a ruthless, self-proclaimed scammer who revels in stealing millions from unsuspecting victims?

但是，一個無情，自稱為騙子的騙子呢？

If that ticks your boxes, then meet Sahil Arora – crypto’s very own super villain.

如果那會勾勒出您的盒子，那就遇到Sahil Arora - 加密貨幣的超級惡棍。

Arora Features in New York Post Interview, Boasts of Riches from Rug Pulls

阿羅拉（Arora）的特色紐約郵政採訪中

A recent article from the New York Post described Arora as a ‘petty grifter’ who seemingly relished his status as an evil tyrant of the crypto underworld.

《紐約郵報》最近的一篇文章將阿羅拉描述為“小grifter”，他似乎很喜歡他作為加密黑社會的邪惡暴君的地位。

Unlike most other scammers who, you know, intelligently remain anonymous, Arora decided it was a good move to not only accept an invitation for an interview with the NY Post – but to brag about his actions, too.

與大多數其他詐騙者不同，您知道聰明地仍然匿名，阿羅拉認為，不僅接受紐約郵報採訪的邀請是一個很好的舉動，而且也吹噓自己的行為。

If that wasn’t enough, Arora even had the gall to suggest his victims should probably be happy he stole their money, because he’s got a strong track record of successful scams.

如果還不夠的話，阿羅拉甚至有膽汁暗示他的受害者可能會很高興他偷了他們的錢，因為他擁有成功的騙局的良好記錄。

If Arora wasn’t living up to his super villain status before – he sure is after that comment.

如果阿羅拉（Arora）以前沒有履行他的超級惡棍狀況，那麼他肯定是在這一評論之後。

Is Crypto Still the Financial ‘Wild Wild West’?

加密仍然是金融的“野生西部”嗎？

Arora is just one of hundreds of people who’ve identified the potential profits from shilling meme coins.

阿羅拉（Arora）只是數百人之一，他們已經確定了先令模因硬幣的潛在利潤。

Traders often trawl through Pump.fun or Dexscreener looking for the next 1000x meme coin to jump on early. Usually, by the time they find it, it’s already too late – but most still invest, anyway.

交易者經常拖到泵。 FUN或DEXSCREENER，尋找下一枚1000倍模因硬幣以提早跳躍。通常，到他們找到它時，它已經為時已晚 - 但是大多數仍然投資。

While Arora, who intentionally deceives people in order for personal gain, is clearly a bad actor who should be punished, meme coin mania does raise interesting philosophical questions for the industry.

雖然有意欺騙人們以謀取個人利益的Arora顯然是一個不好的演員，應該受到懲罰，而Meme Coin Mania確實為該行業提出了有趣的哲學問題。

In a world where financial freedom is paramount, token creators can’t be totally to blame for loss of funds, especially if they are silently taking profits rather than co-ordinating a scam. If investors want to gamble on extremely low-cap, risky meme coins, they should share part of the responsibility, too.

在財務自由至關重要的世界中，代幣的創作者不能完全歸咎於資金損失，尤其是當他們默默地獲得利潤而不是協調騙局時。如果投資者想賭博極低，風險的模因硬幣，他們也應該分擔部分責任。

It’s an interesting conundrum for a sector that’s maturing rapidly. With regulations coming from Governments and institutions lining up for a piece of the crypto pie, it’ll be interesting to see whether lawmakers tackle the rug pull issue, or if they just let scammers and investors battle it out in the ‘Financial Wild Wild West’.

對於一個迅速成熟的行業來說，這是一個有趣的難題。隨著來自政府和機構的法規排隊為一塊加密派派，很有趣的是，立法者是否解決了地毯拉的問題，或者他們只是讓騙子和投資者在“金融野生野生野生西部”中與之抗爭。

(Yes, mainstream media does still call crypto that).

（是的，主流媒體仍然將其稱為Crypto）。