萊特幣 [LTC] 在大多數方面都超過了卡爾達諾 [ADA]，但這種趨勢會持續下去嗎？

卡爾達諾的 [ADA] 市值可能比萊特幣的 [LTC] 高出近 100 億美元。但當談到網路活動時，前者就相差甚遠了。

Despite having a market capitalization that is nearly $10 billion higher than Litecoin (LTC), Cardano (ADA) fell short in terms of network activity when compared to the former.

儘管卡爾達諾 (ADA) 的市值比萊特幣 (LTC) 高出近 100 億美元，但與前者相比，在網路活動方面仍有不足。

According to IntoTheBlock, Litecoin had 357,260 active addresses on 31 May, while Cardano had a significantly lower 28,630. Active addresses on a blockchain indicate the number of unique wallets that were involved in successful transactions on that chain.

根據 IntoTheBlock 的數據，截至 5 月 31 日，萊特幣有 357,260 個活躍地址，而卡爾達諾的活躍地址明顯較低，為 28,630 個。區塊鏈上的活躍地址表示該鏈上成功交易涉及的唯一錢包的數量。

However, it is important to note that this metric counts an address only once, regardless of the number of times it is involved in sending or receiving transactions within a day.

但需要注意的是，該指標僅對地址進行一次計數，無論該地址一天內發送或接收交易的次數如何。

This disparity in active addresses translates to Litecoin having 12 times the activity of Cardano. Such variations in activity levels can foreshadow higher prices for a cryptocurrency.

活躍地址的這種差異意味著萊特幣的活躍度是卡爾達諾的 12 倍。活動水準的這種變化可能預示著加密貨幣價格的上漲。

At the time of writing, LTC was trading at $84.52, up 1.53% in the last 24 hours, while ADA was valued at $0.45, indicating a sideways movement in its price.

截至撰寫本文時，LTC 的交易價格為 84.52 美元，在過去 24 小時內上漲了 1.53%，而 ADA 的估值為 0.45 美元，表明其價格正在橫向波動。

A scan of Litecoin’s recent developments by AMBCrypto to ascertain if they influenced this wide margin did not yield any major updates. This suggested that market participants found LTC to be more deserving of attention than ADA at this time.

AMBCrypto 對萊特幣最近的發展進行了掃描，以確定它們是否影響瞭如此大的利潤率，但沒有產生任何重大更新。這表明市場參與者認為 LTC 此時比 ADA 更值得關注。

However, did Litecoin outpace Cardano on all fronts? Let’s find out. One metric that was evaluated was development activity. This was one area where Cardano consistently showed strength.

然而，萊特幣在所有方面都超過了卡爾達諾嗎？讓我們來看看。評估的一項指標是開發活動。這是卡爾達諾一貫展現實力的領域之一。

At the time of this writing, data from Santiment showed that the project’s development activity fell to 55.57. This metric reveals how engaged developers are in ensuring the proper function of a blockchain.

截至撰寫本文時，Santiment 的數據顯示該專案的開發活動降至 55.57。該指標揭示了開發人員在確保區塊鏈正常運作方面的參與程度。

As such, the decline in this metric suggested that code commits to Cardano’s network health had dropped. In the case of Litecoin, it was not the same situation as with the active addresses.

因此，該指標的下降表明對卡爾達諾網路健康狀況的程式碼提交已經下降。就萊特幣而言，情況與活躍地址不同。

According to Santiment, Litecoin's development activity at the time of this writing was 0.036. Compared to Cardano, the active GitHub repositories dedicated to Litecoin were almost non-existent.

根據 Santiment 的數據，在撰寫本文時萊特幣的開發活動為 0.036。與卡爾達諾相比，專門用於萊特幣的活躍 GitHub 儲存庫幾乎不存在。

However, this metric is not known to influence prices in most cases. Hence, the margin does not suggest that ADA would outperform LTC.

然而，在大多數情況下，這項指標不會影響價格。因此，利潤率並不表示 ADA 的表現會優於 LTC。

In terms of price, AMBCrypto also assessed the MVRV ratio. MVRV stands for Market Value to Realized Value and measures profitability and the valuation of a cryptocurrency.

在價格方面，AMBCrypto 也評估了 MVRV 比率。 MVRV 代表市場價值與已實現價值之比，衡量加密貨幣的獲利能力和估值。

At press time, Cardano’s 30-day MVRV ratio was -4.932%. This reading indicated that a lot of ADA holders were dealing with unrealized losses.

截至發稿時，卡爾達諾的 30 天 MVRV 比率為-4.932%。該讀數表明許多 ADA 持有者正在處理未實現的損失。

However, LTC’s situation was different as its ratio was 12.38%. This positive reading implies that the average LTC holder (30-day window) was in profit.

但LTC的情況有所不同，其比例為12.38%。這一積極的讀數意味著 LTC 持有者（30 天窗口）的平均水平是盈利的。

When it comes to valuation, both cryptocurrencies could be said to be valued on the lower end of the spectrum. If the market does return to its extremely bullish phase, ADA might jump to $0.79. Litecoin could also be able to hit $95.37.

在估值方面，這兩種加密貨幣的估值都可以說是處於較低端。如果市場確實回到極度看漲階段，ADA 可能會躍升至 0.79 美元。萊特幣也可能達到 95.37 美元。