莱特币 [LTC] 在大多数方面都超过了卡尔达诺 [ADA]，但这种趋势会持续下去吗？

卡尔达诺的 [ADA] 市值可能比莱特币的 [LTC] 高出近 100 亿美元。但当谈到网络活动时，前者就相差甚远了。

Despite having a market capitalization that is nearly $10 billion higher than Litecoin (LTC), Cardano (ADA) fell short in terms of network activity when compared to the former.

尽管卡尔达诺 (ADA) 的市值比莱特币 (LTC) 高出近 100 亿美元，但与前者相比，在网络活动方面仍存在不足。

According to IntoTheBlock, Litecoin had 357,260 active addresses on 31 May, while Cardano had a significantly lower 28,630. Active addresses on a blockchain indicate the number of unique wallets that were involved in successful transactions on that chain.

根据 IntoTheBlock 的数据，截至 5 月 31 日，莱特币有 357,260 个活跃地址，而卡尔达诺的活跃地址明显较低，为 28,630 个。区块链上的活跃地址表示该链上成功交易涉及的唯一钱包的数量。

However, it is important to note that this metric counts an address only once, regardless of the number of times it is involved in sending or receiving transactions within a day.

但需要注意的是，该指标仅对地址进行一次计数，无论该地址一天内发送或接收交易的次数如何。

This disparity in active addresses translates to Litecoin having 12 times the activity of Cardano. Such variations in activity levels can foreshadow higher prices for a cryptocurrency.

活跃地址的这种差异意味着莱特币的活跃度是卡尔达诺的 12 倍。活动水平的这种变化可能预示着加密货币价格的上涨。

At the time of writing, LTC was trading at $84.52, up 1.53% in the last 24 hours, while ADA was valued at $0.45, indicating a sideways movement in its price.

截至撰写本文时，LTC 的交易价格为 84.52 美元，在过去 24 小时内上涨了 1.53%，而 ADA 的估值为 0.45 美元，表明其价格正在横向波动。

A scan of Litecoin’s recent developments by AMBCrypto to ascertain if they influenced this wide margin did not yield any major updates. This suggested that market participants found LTC to be more deserving of attention than ADA at this time.

AMBCrypto 对莱特币最近的发展进行了扫描，以确定它们是否影响了如此大的利润率，但没有产生任何重大更新。这表明市场参与者认为 LTC 此时比 ADA 更值得关注。

However, did Litecoin outpace Cardano on all fronts? Let’s find out. One metric that was evaluated was development activity. This was one area where Cardano consistently showed strength.

然而，莱特币在所有方面都超过了卡尔达诺吗？让我们来看看吧。评估的一项指标是开发活动。这是卡尔达诺一贯表现出实力的领域之一。

At the time of this writing, data from Santiment showed that the project’s development activity fell to 55.57. This metric reveals how engaged developers are in ensuring the proper function of a blockchain.

截至撰写本文时，Santiment 的数据显示该项目的开发活动降至 55.57。该指标揭示了开发人员在确保区块链正常运行方面的参与程度。

As such, the decline in this metric suggested that code commits to Cardano’s network health had dropped. In the case of Litecoin, it was not the same situation as with the active addresses.

因此，该指标的下降表明卡尔达诺网络健康状况的代码提交量已经下降。就莱特币而言，情况与活跃地址不同。

According to Santiment, Litecoin's development activity at the time of this writing was 0.036. Compared to Cardano, the active GitHub repositories dedicated to Litecoin were almost non-existent.

根据 Santiment 的数据，在撰写本文时莱特币的开发活动为 0.036。与卡尔达诺相比，专门用于莱特币的活跃 GitHub 存储库几乎不存在。

However, this metric is not known to influence prices in most cases. Hence, the margin does not suggest that ADA would outperform LTC.

然而，在大多数情况下，这一指标不会影响价格。因此，利润率并不表明 ADA 的表现会优于 LTC。

In terms of price, AMBCrypto also assessed the MVRV ratio. MVRV stands for Market Value to Realized Value and measures profitability and the valuation of a cryptocurrency.

在价格方面，AMBCrypto 还评估了 MVRV 比率。 MVRV 代表市场价值与已实现价值之比，衡量加密货币的盈利能力和估值。

At press time, Cardano’s 30-day MVRV ratio was -4.932%. This reading indicated that a lot of ADA holders were dealing with unrealized losses.

截至发稿时，卡尔达诺的 30 天 MVRV 比率为-4.932%。该读数表明许多 ADA 持有者正在处理未实现的损失。

However, LTC’s situation was different as its ratio was 12.38%. This positive reading implies that the average LTC holder (30-day window) was in profit.

但LTC的情况有所不同，其比例为12.38%。这一积极的读数意味着 LTC 持有者（30 天窗口）的平均水平是盈利的。

When it comes to valuation, both cryptocurrencies could be said to be valued on the lower end of the spectrum. If the market does return to its extremely bullish phase, ADA might jump to $0.79. Litecoin could also be able to hit $95.37.

在估值方面，这两种加密货币的估值都可以说处于较低端。如果市场确实回到极度看涨阶段，ADA 可能会跃升至 0.79 美元。莱特币也可能达到 95.37 美元。