歷史上最大的5個最大加密貨幣（加密）硬幣崩潰了

自Altcoins入口以來，加密貨幣市場已經爆炸了創造力，新策略和壯觀的失敗。與任何新技術一樣，與創新相關的痛苦越來越大。

Since the entrance of altcoins, the crypto market has seen an explosion of creativity, new strategies, and spectacular failures. As with any new technology, there are growing pains associated with innovation.

自Altcoins入口以來，加密貨幣市場已經爆炸了創造力，新策略和壯觀的失敗。與任何新技術一樣，與創新相關的痛苦越來越大。

Now, whether these pains originate from bad programming, management, security, or timing is what makes coin collapses so interesting. Here are the 5 largest coin collapses in crypto history.

現在，這些痛苦是源於不良的編程，管理，安全還是時間，這使硬幣崩潰了。這是加密歷史上5個最大的硬幣倒塌。

1. LUNA/UST – The $40 Billion Collapse That Shook DeFi

1。 Luna/ust - 400億美元的崩潰

LUNA entered the market in January 2018. The project was unique in that it introduced a high-performance blockchain, the LUNA token, and an algorithmic stablecoin dubbed UST. This combination promised to be a game changer for DeFi users who saw the option to easily dodge market volatility as a big plus alongside the Terra ecosystem's offerings.

露娜（Luna）於2018年1月進入市場。該項目的獨特之處在於它引入了高性能區塊鏈，露娜（Luna）令牌和算法stablecoin被稱為ust。對於Defi用戶來說，這種組合有望成為遊戲規則改變者，他們認為可以輕鬆地躲避市場波動率的選項與Terra生態系統的產品一起散發出很大的優勢。

An algorithmic stablecoin differs from traditional versions in that it doesn’t have fiat currency reserves or off-chain assets backing it. Instead, a mathematical equation will adjust a reserve filled with another cryptocurrency to keep the stablecoin pegged to its value. In this instance, UST had a 1:1 dollar peg.

算法的穩定性與傳統版本不同，因為它沒有菲亞特貨幣儲備或支持它的鍊鍊資產。取而代之的是，數學方程將調整裝有另一種加密貨幣的儲備，以使穩定的固定固定為其值。在這種情況下，UST有1：1美元的釘子。

Crypto Collapses

加密崩潰

Everything was going as planned until May 2022, when sudden market volatility caused UST to lose its peg. Unfortunately, the market volatility also affected the value of the tokens' underlying asset, LUNA. This shift in value meant the algorithm was unable to meet the reserves needed to keep the token pegged at its $1 value.

一切都按計劃進行，直到2022年5月，當時市場的突然波動導致UST失去了PEG。不幸的是，市場波動也影響了令牌基本資產Luna的價值。價值轉變意味著該算法無法滿足將令牌固定為1美元的價值所需的儲量。

Recognizing the time it took for the project to regain its peg, traders began to worry about LUNA and its operations. They began selling LUNA in droves. In response, the developers issued more tokens. This maneuver only led to hyperinflation, and within hours, the writing was on the wall.

認識到該項目重新獲得釘子所花費的時間，交易員開始擔心露娜及其運營。他們開始以小傢伙出售露娜。作為回應，開發人員發布了更多的令牌。這種操縱只會導致過度通貨膨脹，在幾個小時內，寫作就在牆上。

Consequently, the LUNA/UST crash was a massive kick in the charts to traders who saw the project lose $40B in market capitalization in less than 24 hours.

因此，Luna/UST撞車事故在圖表中對交易員來說是一個巨大的踢球，他們看到該項目在不到24小時內損失了40B美元的市值。

2. Mantra – Ongoing Allegations of Insider Dumping

2.咒語 - 內幕傾銷的持續指控

The Mantra OM crash is the most recent token collapse to make the list. This high-level fiasco is still under investigation as the project's developers claim that market manipulation was to blame for the sudden 90% loss in value over 24 hours.

Mantra Om崩潰是列入列表的最新象徵崩潰。由於該項目的開發商聲稱，這一高級慘敗仍在調查中，因為該項目在24小時內的價值突然損失造成了90％的損失。

Mantra was touted as an enterprise-level Real World Asset ecosystem. RWA refers to transferring assets onto a blockchain. For example, you could tokenize your car by making the title a token. In this way, you have now created an RWA blockchain asset.

咒語被吹捧為企業級現實世界資產生態系統。 RWA是指將資產轉移到區塊鏈上。例如，您可以通過使標題成為代幣來使您的汽車象徵性。這樣，您現在創建了一個RWA區塊鏈資產。

RWA token holders could transfer ownership of their assets as easily as tokens. They could also break large assets into smaller tokens, allowing more investors to access the market with less capital. All of these factors made the project a draw for RWA traders.

RWA代幣持有人可以像代幣一樣容易轉移其資產的所有權。他們還可以將大型資產分解為較小的代幣，從而使更多的投資者能夠以更少的資本進入市場。所有這些因素使該項目成為RWA交易者的吸引力。

OM Token Price Crash Sparks Controversy

OM令牌價格崩潰火花爭議

On April 13, everything changed for OM token holders when their Sunday morning was shattered by news of the token dropping from $6.30 to below $0.50 in value in hours. The losses happened so fast that many in the market claimed that some sort of insider trading or rug pull was involved.

在4月13日，當代幣週日早晨被ike幣從6.30美元下降到低於0.50美元的價值時，OM令牌持有人的一切都改變了。損失發生得如此之快，以至於市場上的許多人聲稱涉及某種內幕交易或地毯拉力。

These allegations were met with a response from the project's developers, who state that none of their tokens were sold. However, further investigation found that millions of OM tokens were shared with two community members. In response to the insider trading and member sales, the developers and alleged traders claim that the wallets are not associated with them in any way.

這些指控得到了該項目的開發商的回應，他們說他們的代幣都沒有出售。但是，進一步的調查發現，數以百萬計的OM令牌與兩個社區成員共享。為了回應內部人士的交易和會員銷售，開發商和所謂的交易者聲稱這些錢包與它們無關。

These two members methodically dumped their bags on centralized exchanges during the losses. These actions are confirmed by Binance and OKX. Both exchanges also noted that they had flagged OM token actions because they noticed an increased use of the token to secure lending.

在損失期間，這兩個成員有條不紊地將行李丟在集中式交易所上。這些動作由Binance和OKX確認。兩項交流還指出，他們已經標記了OM令牌動作，因為他們注意到令牌越來越多地使用代幣來確保貸款。

The allegations against the developer continue to stack up. Some now believe this was a long, well-planned plot. They point out that the developers decided to switch from a limited supply token to a deflationary strategy. This maneuver allowed them to effectively issue double the tokens, which appear to have been used to take out loans. As more allegations come forth, both the crypto community and regulators await answers to account for the sudden drop in market cap from $6B+ to just around $681M.

針對開發商的指控繼續堆積。現在，有些人認為這是一個漫長的計劃。他們指出，開發人員決定從有限的供應令牌轉換為通縮策略。這種操作使他們能夠有效地發出兩倍的令牌，這些令牌似乎被用來拿出貸款。隨著越來越多的指控，加密貨幣社區和監管機構都在等待答案，以解釋市值的突然下降，從6B++ 6.81億美元約為6.81億美元。

3. Bitconnect – The Infamous $2.75B Crypto Ponzi Collapse

3。 bitConnect - 臭名昭著的$ 2.75B加密龐氏騙局

This next crypto collapse was one of the most spectacular ever to have occurred. The Bitconnect ecosystem entered the market in 2016 amid the crypto breakout year. The crypto market was seeing massive adoption at this time, and people were eager to participate in any way possible.

下一個加密貨幣崩潰是有史以來最壯觀的一次。 BitConnect生態系統於2016年在加密突破年度中進入市場。加密市場目前正在看到大量採用，人們渴望以任何可能的方式參加。

As a result, this desire led to an influx of scammers as the tech was still a mystery to most. Bitconnect entered the market as a crypto P2P lending service. Users could join and send their crypto to Bitconnect. They would receive BCC tokens in return. Their deposited funds would then be lent out to other users, and the interest would be paid

結果，這種渴望導致了大量騙子，因為該技術對大多數人來說仍然是一個謎。 BitConnect作為加密P2P貸款服務進入市場。用戶可以加入並將其加密貨幣發送到BitConnect。他們將獲得BCC令牌作為回報。然後，他們的存款資金將藉給其他用戶，並將支付利息