特朗普與世界上最富有的人的秘密加密貨幣晚餐的內部故事

在周四晚上，特朗普國家高爾夫俱樂部華盛頓州華盛頓特區的優雅大廳有期待。

On a sultry Thursday evening, the elegant halls of Trump National Golf Club Washington, D.C. shimmer with anticipation. Gilded chandeliers cast golden halos across the room, illuminating more than 200 sharply dressed, mostly anonymous crypto titans who have gathered for a singular purpose: to dine with President Donald Trump.

在周四晚上，特朗普國家高爾夫俱樂部華盛頓州華盛頓特區的優雅大廳有期待。鍍金的枝形吊燈在整個房間裡施放了金色的光環，闡明了200多個穿著的衣服，主要是匿名的加密泰坦，他們聚集在一起是出於單一的目的：與唐納德·特朗普總統一起用餐。

Entry to this black-tie optional affair is anything but ordinary. To snag one of the coveted 220 seats, each guest has had to shell out anywhere from $55,000 to a staggering $37.7 million on Trump’s notorious cryptocurrency token, $TRUMP.

進入這個黑領帶的可選事件並非普通。為了抓住一個令人垂涎的220個席位之一，每位客人不得不在特朗普臭名昭著的加密貨幣代幣（特朗普$ trump）上掏出55,000美元到驚人的3770萬美元。

The numbers are as dizzying as the drama. According to leading blockchain analysts at Nansen, the chosen few collectively clocked in $394 million to climb the contest leaderboard. The elite seven alone plunked down over $10 million each, engaging in a digital arms race where the average winner chipped in $1.79 million. Even those who narrowly squeezed into the last tiers did so with deposits that far exceed the legal limit for a direct political donation.

這些數字就像戲劇一樣令人眼花night亂。根據Nansen的領先區塊鏈分析師的說法，少數人以3.94億美元的價格集體登上了比賽排行榜。僅精英七人就下跌了超過1000萬美元，參加了一場數字武器競賽，平均贏家籌集了179萬美元。即使是那些狹窄地擠入最後一級的人，也以直接政治捐贈的法律限製而做到了這一點。

But who are these individuals maneuvering such immense sums? Most remain wisps behind cryptocurrency addresses and clever nicknames—the new aristocracy of digital wealth. One, reveling in the attention, is Justin Sun, a Chinese-born crypto entrepreneur and citizen of St. Kitts and Nevis, who claims the top spot. Yet, a majority—up to 72% according to independent researcher Molly White—appear to be foreign nationals, their wallets traced through global crypto exchanges off-limits to Americans. Among the guests are financiers from Singapore and Australia, their wallets jingling with digital coins instead of campaign contributions.

但是，這些人在操縱如此巨大的款項？加密貨幣地址和巧妙的暱稱是數字財富的新貴族。一個引人注目的是賈斯汀·孫（Justin Sun），他是中國出生的加密企業家，也是聖基茨和尼維斯的公民，他聲稱是首位。然而，大多數人（根據獨立研究人員莫莉·懷特（Molly White）的說法，大多數人都將其作為外國國民，他們的錢包通過全球加密貨幣交易所向美國人提供了限制。客人包括來自新加坡和澳大利亞的金融家，他們的錢包用數字硬幣而不是競選捐款。

This spectacle has naturally sparked heated debate among legal and political experts. America’s campaign finance laws have long drawn clear lines: foreign nationals are banned from giving anything at all, let alone millions, to presidential campaigns. Moreover, President Trump, unlike most federal employees, sits curiously exempt from the standard conflict-of-interest rules, as explained by Dan Weiner of the Brennan Center for Justice. This hackle-raising loophole allows for moves like this, merging business, power, and politics in ways that even the boldest prior administrations wouldn’t dare.

這種奇觀自然引發了法律和政治專家之間的激烈辯論。美國的競選財務法律長期以來一直清晰：完全禁止外國國民提供任何東西，更不用說數百萬美元來參加總統競選活動。此外，與大多數聯邦僱員不同，特朗普總統奇怪地避免了布倫南司法中心的丹·韋納（Dan Weiner）所解釋的標準衝突規則。這個刺耳的漏洞可以採取這樣的舉動，以最勇敢的先前政府不敢的方式將業務，權力和政治融合在一起。

While the official contest site maintains that Trump is merely a “guest” and not actively soliciting funds, critics view this as a continuation of a familiar narrative: private business meeting public office. However, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly vehemently asserts that President Trump remains focused solely on “GOOD deals for the American people,” dismissing claims of self-interest as political spite.

雖然官方競賽網站堅持認為特朗普只是“客人”，而不是積極招募資金，但批評家認為這是熟悉的敘述的延續：私人商務會議公共辦公室。然而，白宮發言人安娜·凱利（Anna Kelly）強烈斷言，特朗普總統仍然專注於“美國人民的良好交易”，駁斥了自私自利的主張是政治上的惡意。

As the last toast is raised and laughter mingles with the clink of fine glassware, the event leaves one thing clear: the lines between presidential power, digital innovation, and personal enrichment have never been more blurred. Whether history will view this as the dawn of a new era in political fundraising or a cautionary tale remains to be seen—perhaps time, and possibly regulators, will tell. You Won’t Believe the Ups and Downs: The Surprising Truth About Trump’s Crypto Dinner Gala

隨著最後一個吐司的飼養，並與精美的玻璃器皿的叮噹聲混合在一起，該活動留下了一件事情：總統權力，數字創新和個人豐富之間的界線從未如此模糊。歷史是否會將其視為政治籌款活動的新時代的曙光，還是一個警告性的故事，還有待觀察，也許時代，可能是監管機構。您不會相信起伏：特朗普的加密晚宴的令人驚訝的真相

As the dust settles on this extravagant experiment in tech-infused politicking, the Forbes-profiled elites and everyday investors alike are left wondering: is this the future of fundraising—or a doorway to unprecedented political risk?

隨著塵埃落定為技術注入的政治實驗的奢侈實驗，福布斯專業的精英和日常投資者都想知道：這是籌款的未來，還是前所未有的政治風險的門口？

Crypto, Politics, and Power: What Will Happen Next? Future Trends & Bold Forecasts Revealed!

加密，政治和權力：接下來會發生什麼？未來的趨勢和大膽的預測揭示了！

Experts from Nansen predict a sharp rise in politically affiliated tokens. Following the eye-popping $394 million spent on the $TRUMP coin event, other candidates and political figures are likely to experiment with their own branded cryptocurrency options, harnessing meme coin energy for both fundraising and engagement.

Nansen的專家預測，政治上的代幣會急劇上升。在$特朗普硬幣活動上花費了3.94億美元，其他候選人和政治人物很可能會嘗試自己的品牌加密貨幣選擇，從而利用Meme Coin Coin Energy進行籌款和參與。

With nearly 72% of big spenders identified as foreign nationals, researchers like those at Brennan Center for Justice foresee mounting scrutiny—and possibly reform—of U.S. campaign finance rules as investors from Singapore, Australia, and beyond experiment with decentralized networks for political participation.

近72％的大支出者被確定為外國國民，像布倫南司法中心這樣的研究人員預見了審查，並可能改革了我們的競選財務規則，作為來自新加坡，澳大利亞的投資者，超越了對政治參與的分散網絡進行實驗。

The event highlights a growing trend, noted by legal analysts at Chainalysis, of intertwining political branding with personal business ventures, which could inspire copycats in future campaigns but also spark more urgent calls for regulatory clarity and conflict-of-interest reforms.

該事件強調了一個不斷增長的趨勢，法律分析師在鏈分析方面指出，將政治品牌與個人商業企業交織在一起，這可能會在未來的競選活動中激發模仿者，但也激發了更緊急的調節性清晰度和利益衝突改革的要求。

As transaction volumes escalate and campaign finance boundaries are pushed, watchdogs like Federal Election Commission may be prompted to develop crypto-specific regulations, leading to innovations in compliance technology and transparency tools.

隨著交易量的升級和競選財務界限的推動，可能會提示像聯邦選舉委員會這樣的監管機構制定特定於加密貨幣的法規，從而導致合規技術和透明度工具的創新。

The phenomenon of black-tie galas accessible only to top crypto holders is just unfolding. Industry observers at Forbes forecast a luxury niche where digital tokens grant access to exclusive political, business, or celebrity gatherings, cementing cryptocurrency's role as the new social currency.

Black-tie Galas的現象僅在頂級加密持有人方面可以訪問。 《福布斯》的行業觀察者預測了一個奢侈品利基市場，數字代幣授予獲得獨家政治，商業或名人聚會的訪問權限，從而鞏固了加密貨幣作為新的社會貨幣的作用。

Platforms like Truth Social are poised to become even bigger hubs for announcements and mobilization as campaigns integrate digital assets for both publicity and direct fundraising in real time.

隨著廣告系列將數字資產納入宣傳和直接籌款活動，諸如真相社交之類的平台有望成為更大的樞紐和動員。

Looking ahead, most analysts agree that the fusion of cryptocurrency and politics is still in its early stages. Expect more rapid innovation, higher stakes—and, inevitably, new legal battles as power,

展望未來，大多數分析師都同意，加密貨幣和政治的融合仍處於早期階段。期望更快的創新，更高的賭注，並且不可避免地，新的法律鬥爭是權力的，