一半百分點在1851年的皇冠上擊中可能是偽造的

美國早期銅硬幣的專家得出結論，一半百分之一擊中了1851年的真正的冠冕。

Experts on early United States copper coins conclude that a half cent struck over a struck genuine 1851 Coronet cent is likely counterfeited.

美國早期銅硬幣的專家得出結論，一半百分之一擊中了1851年的真正的冠冕。

Copper collector Henry T. Hettger acquired the piece from a recent eBay auction online and had the piece examined by noted copper specialists J.R. “Bob” Grellman, from M & G (McCawley and Grellman) Auctions, and Jack Young, who serves as moderator of the Facebook group Dark Side: Counterfeits and Fakes.

銅收集者亨利·赫特格（Henry T.

“Consensus is counterfeit,” Grellman said in a May 5 email to Coin World. He wrote, “Cent genuine but half cent stamp counterfeit,” indicating an underlying genuine cent coin was used as host for a counterfeit overstriking of a half cent.

格雷爾曼在5月5日給硬幣世界的電子郵件中說：“共識是偽造的。”他寫道：“美好但半美分的郵票偽造”，表明基本的真實硬幣被用作偽造半美分的偽造的主機。

Grellman stated Hettger’s acquisition would be offered in McCawley and Grellman’s auction slated for the 2026 Early American Coppers convention sale in Charlotte, North Carolina, to be accompanied by the proviso “Highly suspect with no guarantee of authenticity.”

格雷爾曼（Grellman）表示，赫特格（Hettger）的收購將在麥考利（McCawley）和格雷爾曼（Grellman）的拍賣中提供，該拍賣計劃於北卡羅來納州夏洛特（Charlotte）舉行的2026年早期美國銅公約出售，並伴隨著“高度懷疑”，“沒有保證真實性”。

The EAC convention in Charlotte will be held April 29 to May 3 at the Sheraton Charlotte Airport Hotel.

夏洛特舉行的EAC大會將於4月29日至5月3日在夏洛特夏洛特機場酒店舉行。

According to Hettger, the double denomination copper appears “with reverse of half cent coined on the obverse of an 1851 large cent, combined with a brockage of a half cent reverse on the reverse of the large cent.”

根據Hettger的說法，雙層面額的銅出現“在1851年的大分中，半百分鐘的反面是相反的，結合了一半倒數，在大百分之傾倒的情況下相反。”

Hettger further explained the double-denomination piece “came up a few weeks ago on eBay with another 1851 cent considered a faux error as was the half cent/large cent. Sent to Grellman upon receipt for authentication with the result he originally considered the double denomination a possible error, but the other coin was post mint made damage. Price for two coins in the auction was $122, according to Hettger. Grellman changed his assessment after consulting with Young.

Hettger進一步解釋了“幾週前在eBay上出現的雙重賬單”文章，另有1851 Cent認為是人造錯誤，就像半百分之/大的百分鐘一樣。收到經過身份驗證後送往Grellman，其結果他認為雙重面額可能是可能的錯誤，但其他Coin在Acuction中的價格造成了薄荷的損失。在Acucter中，他的價格損壞了，這是在Acucter上造成的。