一半百分点在1851年的皇冠上击中可能是伪造的

美国早期铜硬币的专家得出结论，一半百分之一击中了1851年的真正的冠冕。

Experts on early United States copper coins conclude that a half cent struck over a struck genuine 1851 Coronet cent is likely counterfeited.

美国早期铜硬币的专家得出结论，一半百分之一击中了1851年的真正的冠冕。

Copper collector Henry T. Hettger acquired the piece from a recent eBay auction online and had the piece examined by noted copper specialists J.R. “Bob” Grellman, from M & G (McCawley and Grellman) Auctions, and Jack Young, who serves as moderator of the Facebook group Dark Side: Counterfeits and Fakes.

铜收集者亨利·赫特格（Henry T.

“Consensus is counterfeit,” Grellman said in a May 5 email to Coin World. He wrote, “Cent genuine but half cent stamp counterfeit,” indicating an underlying genuine cent coin was used as host for a counterfeit overstriking of a half cent.

格雷尔曼在5月5日给硬币世界的电子邮件中说：“共识是伪造的。”他写道：“美好但半美分的邮票伪造”，表明基本的真实硬币被用作伪造半美分的伪造的主机。

Grellman stated Hettger’s acquisition would be offered in McCawley and Grellman’s auction slated for the 2026 Early American Coppers convention sale in Charlotte, North Carolina, to be accompanied by the proviso “Highly suspect with no guarantee of authenticity.”

格雷尔曼（Grellman）表示，赫特格（Hettger）的收购将在麦考利（McCawley）和格雷尔曼（Grellman）的拍卖中提供，该拍卖计划于北卡罗来纳州夏洛特（Charlotte）举行的2026年早期美国铜公约出售，并伴随着“高度怀疑”，“没有保证真实性”。

The EAC convention in Charlotte will be held April 29 to May 3 at the Sheraton Charlotte Airport Hotel.

夏洛特举行的EAC大会将于4月29日至5月3日在夏洛特夏洛特机场酒店举行。

According to Hettger, the double denomination copper appears “with reverse of half cent coined on the obverse of an 1851 large cent, combined with a brockage of a half cent reverse on the reverse of the large cent.”

根据Hettger的说法，双层面额的铜出现“在1851年的大分中，半百分钟的反面是相反的，结合了一半倒数，在大百分之倾倒的情况下相反。”

Hettger further explained the double-denomination piece “came up a few weeks ago on eBay with another 1851 cent considered a faux error as was the half cent/large cent. Sent to Grellman upon receipt for authentication with the result he originally considered the double denomination a possible error, but the other coin was post mint made damage. Price for two coins in the auction was $122, according to Hettger. Grellman changed his assessment after consulting with Young.

Hettger进一步解释了“几周前在eBay上出现的双重账单”文章，另有1851 Cent认为是人造错误，就像半百分之/大的百分钟一样。收到经过身份验证后送往Grellman，其结果他认为双重面额可能是可能的错误，但其他Coin在Acuction中的价格造成了薄荷的损失。在Acucter中，他的价格损坏了，这是在Acucter上造成的。