在CoinMarketCap上盜竊$ 43K之後，Cointelegraph面臨類似的安全漏洞。 “加密搶劫”事件有關係嗎？讓我們研究細節。

Crypto Heist Hits CoinTelegraph: Echoes of the CoinMarketCap $43K Theft?

Crypto Heist Hits Cointelegraph：CoinMarketCap的迴聲$ 43K盜竊？

Just when you thought the crypto world couldn't get any wilder, another security breach surfaces! Following a $43K theft on CoinMarketCap, CoinTelegraph experienced a similar attack. Were the 'Crypto heist' incidents related? Let's dive into the details.

就在您認為加密貨幣世界無法變得荒野時，另一個安全漏洞！在CoinMarketCap上盜竊$ 43K之後，Cointelegraph經歷了類似的攻擊。 “加密搶劫”事件有關係嗎？讓我們研究細節。

CoinTelegraph Targeted: A Familiar Threat

COINTELEGRAPH針對性：熟悉的威脅

CoinTelegraph, a major player in crypto news, faced security hiccups. Reports surfaced on X (formerly Twitter) about users being targeted by a frontend exploit. Malicious code was injected via compromised ad scripts and third-party widgets, echoing the CoinMarketCap incident. The attackers advertised a fake token airdrop, prompting users to connect their wallets – a classic move to drain assets.

加密新聞的主要參與者Cointelegraph面臨安全打ic。報告在X（以前是Twitter）上浮出水面有關用戶是由前端利用的目標。通過折衷的AD腳本和第三方小部件注入惡意代碼，與CoinMarketCap事件相呼應。攻擊者宣傳了一個偽標的空投，促使用戶將錢包連接起來，這是耗盡資產的經典舉措。

MetaMask even flagged the website as “deceptive,” offering users a crucial heads-up. Fortunately, CoinTelegraph acted swiftly, confirming the breach and removing the unauthorized code. They've also promised to beef up security to prevent future incidents.

Metamask甚至將網站標記為“欺騙性”，為用戶提供了關鍵的頭腦。幸運的是，Cointelegraph迅速採取了行動，確認了違規行為並刪除了未經授權的代碼。他們還承諾將加強安全性，以防止未來的事件。

The CoinMarketCap Connection: Coincidence or Conspiracy?

CoinMarketCap連接：巧合或陰謀？

The burning question: are these attacks related? Both CoinMarketCap and CoinTelegraph, trusted platforms in the crypto community, were targeted with malicious scripts via third-party services. While there's no concrete evidence linking the two, the similarities are hard to ignore. It does make you wonder if the same group is behind these heists, doesn't it?

燃燒的問題：這些攻擊有關係嗎？ CoinMarketCap和Cointelegraph是加密社區中值得信賴的平台，都通過第三方服務針對惡意腳本。雖然沒有鏈接兩者的具體證據，但相似之處很難忽略。這確實使您想知道這些搶劫背後是否同一組，不是嗎？

Key Takeaways and Insights

關鍵要點和見解

• Frontend Exploits: Both attacks leveraged frontend JavaScript vulnerabilities, highlighting the need for robust security measures.
• Third-Party Risks: The breaches underscore the risks associated with third-party services and the importance of thorough vetting.
• User Vigilance: The MetaMask warning proves that user-side security tools can make a difference in preventing theft.

Final Thoughts: Stay Safe Out There!

最終想法：在那里安全！

In the ever-evolving world of crypto, security is paramount. Whether these incidents are connected or not, they serve as a stark reminder to stay vigilant, double-check everything, and never blindly trust airdrop offers. And hey, maybe it's a good time to review your wallet security practices, just in case!

在不斷發展的加密世界中，安全至關重要。無論這些事件是否連接，它們都可以提醒您保持警惕，雙重檢查一切，並且從不盲目信任Airdrop提供的提供。嘿，也許現在是審查您的錢包安全實踐的好時機，以防萬一！