在CoinMarketCap上盗窃$ 43K之后，Cointelegraph面临类似的安全漏洞。 “加密抢劫”事件有关系吗？让我们研究细节。

Crypto Heist Hits CoinTelegraph: Echoes of the CoinMarketCap $43K Theft?

Crypto Heist Hits Cointelegraph：CoinMarketCap的回声$ 43K盗窃？

Just when you thought the crypto world couldn't get any wilder, another security breach surfaces! Following a $43K theft on CoinMarketCap, CoinTelegraph experienced a similar attack. Were the 'Crypto heist' incidents related? Let's dive into the details.

就在您认为加密货币世界无法变得荒野时，另一个安全漏洞！在CoinMarketCap上盗窃$ 43K之后，Cointelegraph经历了类似的攻击。 “加密抢劫”事件有关系吗？让我们研究细节。

CoinTelegraph Targeted: A Familiar Threat

COINTELEGRAPH针对性：熟悉的威胁

CoinTelegraph, a major player in crypto news, faced security hiccups. Reports surfaced on X (formerly Twitter) about users being targeted by a frontend exploit. Malicious code was injected via compromised ad scripts and third-party widgets, echoing the CoinMarketCap incident. The attackers advertised a fake token airdrop, prompting users to connect their wallets – a classic move to drain assets.

加密新闻的主要参与者Cointelegraph面临安全打ic。报告在X（以前是Twitter）上浮出水面有关用户是由前端利用的目标。通过折衷的AD脚本和第三方小部件注入恶意代码，与CoinMarketCap事件相呼应。攻击者宣传了一个伪标的空投，促使用户将钱包连接起来，这是耗尽资产的经典举措。

MetaMask even flagged the website as “deceptive,” offering users a crucial heads-up. Fortunately, CoinTelegraph acted swiftly, confirming the breach and removing the unauthorized code. They've also promised to beef up security to prevent future incidents.

Metamask甚至将网站标记为“欺骗性”，为用户提供了关键的头脑。幸运的是，Cointelegraph迅速采取了行动，确认了违规行为并删除了未经授权的代码。他们还承诺将加强安全性，以防止未来的事件。

The CoinMarketCap Connection: Coincidence or Conspiracy?

CoinMarketCap连接：巧合或阴谋？

The burning question: are these attacks related? Both CoinMarketCap and CoinTelegraph, trusted platforms in the crypto community, were targeted with malicious scripts via third-party services. While there's no concrete evidence linking the two, the similarities are hard to ignore. It does make you wonder if the same group is behind these heists, doesn't it?

燃烧的问题：这些攻击有关系吗？ CoinMarketCap和Cointelegraph是加密社区中值得信赖的平台，都通过第三方服务针对恶意脚本。虽然没有链接两者的具体证据，但相似之处很难忽略。这确实使您想知道这些抢劫背后是否同一组，不是吗？

Key Takeaways and Insights

关键要点和见解

• Frontend Exploits: Both attacks leveraged frontend JavaScript vulnerabilities, highlighting the need for robust security measures.
• Third-Party Risks: The breaches underscore the risks associated with third-party services and the importance of thorough vetting.
• User Vigilance: The MetaMask warning proves that user-side security tools can make a difference in preventing theft.

Final Thoughts: Stay Safe Out There!

最终想法：在那里安全！

In the ever-evolving world of crypto, security is paramount. Whether these incidents are connected or not, they serve as a stark reminder to stay vigilant, double-check everything, and never blindly trust airdrop offers. And hey, maybe it's a good time to review your wallet security practices, just in case!

在不断发展的加密世界中，安全至关重要。无论这些事件是否连接，它们都可以提醒您保持警惕，双重检查一切，并且从不盲目信任Airdrop提供的提供。嘿，也许现在是审查您的钱包安全实践的好时机，以防万一！