CETUS是SUI生態系統的主要DEX，成為黑客的受害者，損失了2.23億美元

所有網絡參與者已經進行了四天的合作，以收回被盜的資金。凍結資金後，Cetus發起了一項提議以恢復它們

Cetus, the main DEX of the Sui ecosystem, has been hacked and lost 223 million dollars. After four days of cooperation from all network participants to recover the stolen funds, the initiative faces a setback as the hacker threatens legal action.

CETUS是SUI生態系統的主要DEX，已被黑客入侵，損失了2.23億美元。在所有網絡參與者合作四天以恢復被盜資金後，隨著黑客威脅法律訴訟，該計劃將面臨挫折。

The Cetus Story: A Hack and Recovery Efforts

CETUS的故事：黑客和恢復工作

Since its emergence, decentralized finance has fallen victim to hackers targeting funds. In the Sui ecosystem, its main DEX, Cetus, suffered a major hack last week. The attacker manipulated price curves on the DEX using fake tokens to drain the equivalent of 223 million dollars.

自從出現以來，分散的財務已成為針對資金的黑客的受害者。在Sui生態系統中，其主要DEX CETUS上周遭受了重大黑客攻擊。攻擊者使用假令牌操縱DEX的價格曲線，以耗盡相當於2.23億美元的價格。

On the same day, the Cetus team tried to minimize the problem by communicating only about an oracle bug before being forced to publicly acknowledge the theft. Meanwhile, the hacker, aware that it's only a matter of time before measures are taken to prevent him from using the stolen funds, decided to bridge the equivalent of 60 million dollars to the Ethereum blockchain to swap these funds for ETH.

在同一天，CETUS團隊試圖通過僅在被迫公開承認盜竊之前就通信Oracle Bug來最大程度地減少問題。同時，黑客意識到，採取措施阻止他使用被盜資金只是時間問題，決定將相當於6000萬美元的6000萬美元橋接到以太坊區塊鏈，以將這些資金交換為ETH。

The Sui network validators then jointly froze the remaining funds (about 160 million dollars), effectively preventing the hacker from using them, allowing Cetus to consider a strategy for recovering the funds.

然後，SUI網絡驗證者共同凍結了其餘資金（約1.6億美元），有效地阻止了黑客使用它們，從而使Cetus可以考慮收回資金的策略。

The Role of the Sui Foundation in the Recovery

SUI基金會在恢復中的作用

As of Friday, the Sui Foundation intervened to negotiate with the hacker who holds 160 million in USDC frozen on the Sui network and more than 20,000 ETH on the Ethereum blockchain. The foundation proposed that the hacker act as a “white hat” instead of risking criminal prosecution. If he returns the frozen funds and the ETH to demonstrate good faith, he can keep as a reward 2,324 ETH, equivalent to 6 million dollars.

截至週五，SUI基金會介入與黑客進行談判，該黑客在SUI網絡上凍結了1.6億美元的USDC，並在以太坊區塊鏈上進行了20,000多個ETH。該基金會建議黑客起作“白帽”，而不是冒著刑事起訴的風險。如果他返回冷凍資金和ETH以表現出真誠，他可以作為2324 ETH的獎勵，相當於600萬美元。

However, the hacker has not yet accepted this proposal, and several applications have suspended their activity to complete security audits and ensure they are not vulnerable to the same type of attack.

但是，黑客尚未接受該提案，並且一些申請已暫停其活動以完成安全審計，並確保它們不容易受到相同類型的攻擊的影響。

Cetus has decided to change its strategy by using the governance of the Sui network. Its proposal, posted online this weekend, aims to request a network update to directly reclaim the frozen funds, effectively circumventing the hacker’s actions. This radical method is the same as Ethereum’s hard fork in 2017 following The DAO hack and had divided the community.

Cetus決定通過使用SUI網絡的治理來改變其戰略。它的建議本週末在線發布，旨在要求網絡更新直接收回冷凍資金，從而有效地避免了黑客的行動。這種激進的方法與Dao Hack之後的2017年以太坊的堅硬分叉相同，並將社區分開。

This proposal has just received significant support thanks to the support of the Sui foundation. However, it sets two limits on its support: it is informal since the foundation does not use its voting power to ensure the proposal’s success, for reasons of neutrality. Furthermore, the foundation requires that the recovered funds be primarily used to reimburse the application’s users.

由於SUI基金會的支持，該提案剛剛獲得了大力支持。但是，它為其支持設定了兩個限制：這是非正式的，因為基金會由於中立的原因沒有使用其投票權來確保該提案的成功。此外，基金會要求將回收的資金主要用於報銷應用程序的用戶。

Controversy Over the Centralization of the Sui Network

關於SUI網絡集中化的爭議

It's positive that Cetus, the validators, and the Sui foundation are collaborating to recover the funds stolen by the hacker and compensate users. However, the freezing of funds has sparked controversy because it contradicts the decentralization of web3.

很肯定的是，Cetus，驗證者和SUI基金會正在合作收回黑客偷走的資金並補償用戶。但是，資金的凍結引發了爭議，因為它與Web3的分散性相矛盾。

The freeze was possible through the coordinated action of 114 validators and Mysten Labs, the company that manages the network, by changing the source code in real time without consulting the community. Although the motive may be commendable, it shows that the network and users' funds are not censorship-resistant.

通過114個驗證者和Mysten Labs的協調行動，管理網絡的公司通過實時更改源代碼而無需諮詢社區，可以凍結。儘管動機可能值得稱讚，但它表明網絡和用戶的資金並不具有審查制度。

This intervention revives a recurring debate within DeFi: should security take priority at the expense of decentralization?

這項干預措施恢復了DEFI中的反复辯論：安全是否應以權力下放為代價優先考慮？

Four days after the hack of the DEX Cetus, the Sui community must make a decision: should the network be updated to recover the funds? The Sui foundation supports helping compensate users while trying to maintain a semblance of neutrality. But there is no doubt that this hack and its resolution will leave marks on this ecosystem.

DEX CETUS的黑客攻擊後四天，SUI社區必須做出決定：是否應該更新網絡以收回資金？ SUI基金會支持幫助用戶彌補中立性的表徵。但是毫無疑問，該黑客及其解決方案將在該生態系統上留下痕跡。