|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
在分歧日益加深、政治毒性日益增強的時代,「善待彼此」這句話聽起來可能是一句簡單的陳腔濫調。

In a time marked by deepening divisions and increasing political toxicity, the phrase “Be good to each other” might sound like a simple platitude. Still, I believe it is a radical act of defiance against the forces tearing our society apart. Since 2016, I’ve ended my podcasts with this phrase, not because it’s easy, but because it’s essential. The more I observe the world around us—whether in the context of global politics or the ongoing Bitcoin Civil War—the more I see the need for this fundamental principle to guide our actions.
在分歧日益加深、政治毒性日益增強的時代,「善待彼此」這句話聽起來可能是一句簡單的陳腔濫調。儘管如此,我仍然相信這是對撕裂我們社會的力量的激進反抗。自 2016 年以來,我一直用這句話來結束我的播客,不是因為它很容易,而是因為它很重要。我對周圍的世界觀察得越多——無論是在全球政治的背景下還是正在進行的比特幣內戰——我就越發現有必要用這個基本原則來指導我們的行動。
Rudyard Lynch, a social commentator speaking recently on the Danny Jones podcast, articulated a sobering truth: all the ingredients for an American Civil War are already present. We are merely waiting for a catalyst.
社會評論員拉迪亞德·林奇最近在丹尼·瓊斯播客上發表講話,闡明了一個發人深省的事實:美國內戰的所有要素已經存在。我們只是在等待催化劑。
Lynch’s analysis was compelling not just for his grasp of the historical parallels, but for his focus on the cultural decay that comes from a lack of consensus. Today, nearly every issue—social, political, or even personal—comes loaded with implications that place someone into a broader, often toxic, political narrative. In such an environment, building meaningful consensus or trust becomes impossible. This toxicity is the breeding ground for conflict, not cooperation.
林奇的分析令人信服,不僅因為他對歷史相似之處的掌握,而且因為他對缺乏共識而導致的文化衰退的關注。如今,幾乎每個問題——社會問題、政治問題,甚至個人問題——都充滿了影響,使某人陷入更廣泛、往往有毒的政治敘事中。在這樣的環境中,建立有意義的共識或信任變得不可能。這種毒性是衝突而不是合作的溫床。
The cascade effect of radicalism
激進主義的級聯效應
Lynch also noted a crucial dynamic that is often overlooked: the very people who ignite the flames of revolution or civil unrest are rarely the ones who benefit in the end. As conflicts escalate, factions radicalize, and moderates are forced to pick sides or be sidelined. However, once the dust settles, it is often the most radical elements—those who lack the skills to build a sustainable coalition—who are swept away. This dynamic isn’t confined to political revolutions; it plays out in every sphere of life, including the Bitcoin community.
林奇也指出了一個經常被忽視的關鍵動態:點燃革命火焰或內亂的人很少是最終受益的人。隨著衝突升級,派別變得激進,溫和派被迫選邊站隊或靠邊站。然而,一旦塵埃落定,往往是最激進的分子——那些缺乏建立永續聯盟技能的人——被掃地出門。這種動力並不限於政治革命;也包括政治革命。它滲透到生活的各個領域,包括比特幣社群。
I’ve been in the trenches of the Bitcoin Civil War long enough to witness this firsthand.
我已經在比特幣內戰的戰壕裡待了足夠長的時間,親眼目睹了這一點。
While I’m not above trolling my opponents, the overwhelming focus of my work has been on leading by example for the betterment of the broader culture. I’ve often signed off with “be good to each other” because I want to remind people that even though we may disagree, I do not want to see people marginalized, dehumanized, or harmed due to our technical disagreements.
雖然我不會不屑地攻擊我的對手,但我工作的首要重點是以身作則,以改善更廣泛的文化。我經常以「善待彼此」作為結束語,因為我想提醒人們,即使我們可能存在分歧,我也不希望看到人們因為我們的技術分歧而被邊緣化、非人化或受到傷害。
I believe this sentiment is starting to bear fruit.
我相信這種情緒正開始結出碩果。
Today, Bitcoin newcomers are arriving who have little to no context on the extreme toxicity of the past. Instead, they see Bitcoin for what it truly could be at scale—a tool for maximizing the efficiency and velocity of commerce, not just a zero-sum game of ideological dominance or “number go up.”
如今,比特幣新來者對過去的極端毒性幾乎一無所知。相反,他們看到了比特幣真正的規模——一種最大化商業效率和速度的工具,而不僅僅是意識形態主導或「數位上升」的零和遊戲。
That toxic faction still exists, but I’m extremely encouraged to see entrants from the last three or four years discover Bitcoin and immediately start gravitating toward the need for using it to its full potential—much like the BSV community saw in the 2015-2018 era.
這個有毒的派系仍然存在,但我非常高興地看到過去三四年的進入者發現了比特幣,並立即開始傾向於充分利用它的潛力——就像BSV 社區在2015-2018 年看到的那樣時代。
The Bitcoin Civil War: A study in microcosm
比特幣內戰:微觀世界的研究
The Bitcoin Civil War is a microcosm of the larger cultural conflict. On one side, we have the small blockers who have spent years defending the status quo of BTC, focusing on limited block sizes, ideological purity, and the perpetual need to run a node on their mother’s boyfriend’s computers. On the other, big blockers like myself have been advocating for a vision of Bitcoin that scales massively to handle global commerce and data integrity. But here’s where things are getting interesting: the radicals who dominated the conversation for so long are beginning to run out of steam. They’re retiring from the fray, and more hopeful, coalition-building moderates are stepping in to fill the void.
比特幣內戰是更大文化衝突的縮影。一方面,我們有一些小區塊者,他們花了數年時間捍衛 BTC 的現狀,專注於有限的區塊大小、意識形態的純潔性以及在他們母親的男朋友的計算機上運行節點的永久需要。另一方面,像我這樣的大區塊者一直在倡導比特幣的願景,即大規模擴展以處理全球商業和資料完整性。但事情變得有趣了:長期主導對話的激進分子開始失去動力。他們正在退出爭論,而更有希望、建立聯盟的溫和派正在介入填補這一空白。
We are seeing signs of this shift even among our fiercest opponents. While big blockers focus on projects like Teranode, which aims to create a scalable, high-throughput Bitcoin network, and 1Sat Ordinal tokens, which explore novel use cases for micropayments and digital assets, small blockers are revisiting old ideas like the return of OP_CAT and other long-neglected scripts and creating things like Fractal Bitcoin because they want to live in a world where bitcoin is some kind of a monetized, distributed supercomputer too. They are also soliciting big blockers for expertise, recognizing that the future of Bitcoin may lie in a nomadic, centrist culture where Bitcoiners of all stripes can work together across BTC and BSV.
即使在我們最激烈的對手中,我們也看到了這種轉變的跡象。雖然大型區塊鏈者專注於Teranode 等項目(旨在創建一個可擴展、高吞吐量的比特幣網路)和1Sat Ordinal 代幣(探索小額支付和數位資產的新用例),但小型區塊鏈者正在重新審視舊想法,例如OP_CAT 的回歸和其他長期被忽視的腳本並創建像分形比特幣這樣的東西,因為他們希望生活在一個比特幣也是某種貨幣化的分散式超級電腦的世界中。他們也正在徵求大區塊者的專業知識,並認識到比特幣的未來可能在於一種游牧式的中間派文化,在這種文化中,各種類型的比特幣愛好者都可以在BTC 和BSV 上合作。
We are ecstatic to introduce the GOAT of OP_CAT Xiaohui Liu as one of our advisors
我們很高興地介紹 OP_CAT GOAT 劉曉輝作為我們的顧問之一
Xiaohui Liu is an absolute legend and is widely regarded as the leading professional in OP_CAT. Xiaohui will provide top expert guidance on how we utilize OP_CAT in our platform!@scryptplatform pic.twitter.com/I4HxJqHe8m
劉曉輝絕對是一位傳奇人物,被廣泛認為是 OP_CAT 領域的領先專業人士。小慧將為我們如何在我們的平台中使用 OP_CAT 提供頂級專家指導!
— Satspumpfun (@Satspumpfun) August 31, 2024
- Satspumpfun (@Satspumpfun) 2024 年 8 月 31 日
The most bullish part is that instead of hiding or shunning. They are
最樂觀的部分是,而不是隱藏或迴避。他們是
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 比特幣、eCash 分叉和空投動態:深入探討加密貨幣的最新爭議
- 2026-05-03 00:52:02
- 探索最近的 eCash 分叉、其作為高風險空投的分類,以及對比特幣和加密生態系統的更廣泛影響。
-
-
- 聯準會維持利率穩定,地緣政治緊張局勢引發比特幣價格下跌
- 2026-05-01 04:04:38
- 聯準會維持利率的決定,加上中東衝突,影響了比特幣的價格。分析近期趨勢和市場反應。
-
-
-
-
-
-

































