市值: $2.1638T 0.07%
體積(24小時): $40.7046B -18.75%
  • 市值: $2.1638T 0.07%
  • 體積(24小時): $40.7046B -18.75%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.1638T 0.07%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

加密貨幣新聞文章

比特幣核心V30:社區部和OP_Return辯論

2025/09/23 19:45

比特幣核心的V30更新超過了OP_Return限制,讓人聯想到塊大小戰爭。這是下一個大拆分嗎?

比特幣核心V30:社區部和OP_Return辯論

The Bitcoin community is buzzing, and not in a good way. The Bitcoin Core v30 update has dropped a bombshell, igniting a fiery debate over data storage and potentially splitting the community. Let's dive into the drama.

比特幣社區正在嗡嗡作響,而且不是很好。比特幣Core V30更新已刪除了重磅炸彈,引發了有關數據存儲的激烈辯論,並可能將社區分開。讓我們深入研究戲劇。

The Core of the Matter: OP_Return and Community Discord

問題的核心:op_return和社區不和諧

At the heart of the controversy is the OP_Return function, which allows users to embed non-monetary data on the Bitcoin blockchain. The Bitcoin Core v30 update removes the 80-byte limit on this function, sparking concerns about potential spam and even, according to some, the storage of objectionable content like CSAM.

爭議的核心是OP_Return功能,該功能允許用戶在比特幣區塊鏈上嵌入非貨幣數據。比特幣核心V30更新消除了此功能的80字節限制,引發了對潛在垃圾郵件的擔憂,甚至根據某些人的存儲,例如CSAM等令人反感的內容。

Dashjr vs. Song: A Battle of Ideologies

Dashjr vs.歌:意識形態之戰

The debate has pitted prominent figures like Luke Dashjr, a Bitcoin Knots developer, against Jimmy Song, a pro-Core v30 advocate. Dashjr warns that the update could lead to the storage and distribution of harmful content, potentially "killing Bitcoin." He argues that running Core v30 is akin to endorsing CSAM because it supports its storage and distribution. Song, on the other hand, dismisses these fears as overblown, arguing that node runners aren't liable for verifying content and that simply verifying doesn't equate to aiding and abetting harmful activities.

這場辯論使像比特幣結開發商盧克·達什吉(Luke Dashjr)這樣的著名人物與親核V30倡導者吉米·宋(Jimmy Song)抗衡。 Dashjr警告說,更新可能導致有害內容的存儲和分發,可能“殺死比特幣”。他認為,運行Core V30類似於認可CSAM,因為它支持其存儲和分發。另一方面,歌曲將這些恐懼視為誇張,認為節點跑步者對驗證內容不承擔任何責任,並且簡單地驗證並不等於輔助和教nive和教有害活動。

Echoes of the Block Size Wars?

塊大小戰爭的迴聲?

This isn't the first time the Bitcoin community has faced such a fundamental disagreement. The OP_Return debate is drawing parallels to the block size wars of 2015-2017, which ultimately led to the creation of Bitcoin Cash. Could this latest schism result in a similar split?

這不是比特幣社區第一次面臨如此根本的分歧。 OP_Return的辯論是與2015 - 2017年塊大小戰爭的相似之處,最終導致了比特幣現金的創造。這個最新的分裂會導致類似的分歧嗎?

The Exodus to Bitcoin Knots

比特幣結出的出埃及

The controversy has already had a tangible impact. A significant number of node runners are migrating to Bitcoin Knots, an alternative implementation of Bitcoin node software. Bitcoin Knots allows node runners to enforce strict data size limits, a feature proponents argue is crucial for preserving Bitcoin's decentralization. In fact, Knots now accounts for ~20% of network nodes, compared to just ~1% in 2024!

爭議已經產生了切實的影響。大量的節點跑步者正在遷移到比特幣結,這是比特幣節點軟件的替代實現。比特幣結允許節點跑步者執行嚴格的數據尺寸限制,特徵支持者認為對於保留比特幣的權力下放至關重要。實際上,現在結佔網絡節點的約20%,而2024年僅約1%!

Why This Matters: Decentralization at Stake

為什麼這很重要:權力下放

Bitcoin's low data storage requirements are fundamental to its decentralized nature. They allow anyone to run a node on readily available hardware, ensuring broad participation in the network's operation. Removing data limits could lead to increased storage costs, potentially centralizing node operation in the hands of wealthy entities. This in turn could result in a few nodes colluding to alter the consensus rules or reverse transactions.

比特幣的低數據存儲要求是其分散性質的基礎。他們允許任何人在隨時可用的硬件上運行節點,從而確保廣泛參與網絡的操作。刪除數據限制可能會導致存儲成本增加,並可能將節點操作集中在富人手中。反過來,這可能會導致一些節點勾結以改變共識規則或反交易。

Personal Take: Striking a Balance

個人看法:達到平衡

While innovation and flexibility are important, so is preserving the core principles of Bitcoin. Removing the OP_Return limit presents real risks to decentralization and opens the door to potential abuse. A more nuanced approach, perhaps involving dynamic data limits or content filtering mechanisms, might be necessary to strike a balance between functionality and security.

儘管創新和靈活性很重要,但保留比特幣的核心原則也很重要。刪除OP_RET_RETURN限制給分散的實際風險帶來了潛在虐待的大門。更細微的方法可能涉及動態數據限製或內容過濾機制,對於在功能和安全性之間取得平衡可能是必要的。

The Road Ahead

前面的道路

The Bitcoin Core v30 update has thrown a wrench into the works, but the community is resilient. Whether this leads to a fork in the road or a compromise remains to be seen. One thing's for sure: the conversation is far from over.

比特幣核心V30更新已將扳手投入了作品,但社區具有彈性。這是否導致道路上的叉子還是妥協還有待觀察。可以肯定的是:對話還遠遠沒有結束。

So, buckle up, Bitcoin enthusiasts! It's gonna be a wild ride. And hey, at least it's never boring, right?

因此,扣緊比特幣愛好者!這將是一個瘋狂的旅程。嘿,至少從來都不是無聊的,對嗎?

原始來源:u

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2026年08月03日 其他文章發表於