比特幣核心，OP_Return和拒絕死亡的辯論：紐約人

比特幣社區對比特幣核心30.0和OP_Return處於潮濕狀態。是小調整還是濕滑的斜坡？讓我們分解，紐約人的風格。

The Bitcoin world is buzzing, and not in a good way. The latest Bitcoin Core release, version 30.0, has stirred up a real hornet's nest, all thanks to some tweaks around OP_RETURN. What's OP_RETURN, you ask? Think of it as Bitcoin's version of a digital graffiti wall, where folks can embed all sorts of data. And now, Bitcoin Core is about to make that wall a whole lot bigger. Buckle up, because this is about to get interesting.

比特幣世界嗡嗡作響，不是很好。最新的比特幣核心版本版本30.0激起了真正的大黃蜂的巢穴，這要歸功於OP_Return周圍的一些調整。你問什麼是op_return？將其視為比特幣的數字塗鴉牆的版本，人們可以在其中嵌入各種數據。而現在，比特幣核心即將使那堵牆變得更大。係好，因為這將變得有趣。

The Heart of the Matter: Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots

問題的核心：比特幣核心與比特幣結

So, what's the fuss? Bitcoin Core 30.0 is set to relay transactions with larger OP_RETURN outputs by default. Sounds minor, right? Wrong. This seemingly small change has sparked a major rift, with some users threatening to ditch Bitcoin Core altogether for Bitcoin Knots, a software fork maintained by the ever-vocal Luke Dashjr. The core of the debate? Whether Bitcoin should be in the business of facilitating arbitrary data storage.

那麼，大驚小怪？默認情況下，比特幣核心30.0設置為帶有較大OP_Return輸出的交易。聽起來很小，對嗎？錯誤的。這種看似很小的變化引發了一個重大的裂痕，一些用戶威脅要放棄比特幣結的拋棄比特幣結，這是一個由眾多的盧克·達什吉（Luke Dashjr）維護的軟件分叉。辯論的核心？比特幣是否應該從事促進任意數據存儲的業務。

The Bitcoin Knots Stance: Keep Bitcoin Pure

比特幣結的立場：保持比特幣純淨

The Bitcoin Knots crew views this as the beginning of the end. They're not thrilled about the idea of Bitcoin being used as a dumping ground for “spam” data. They worry that this change signals an open invitation to spammers, potentially clogging up the blockchain and driving up transaction fees for regular users. And let's not forget the fear of illicit materials finding their way onto the blockchain, potentially inviting unwanted regulatory scrutiny. For them, Bitcoin should be about one thing and one thing only: monetary transactions.

比特幣結的工作人員將其視為終點的開始。他們對比特幣被用作“垃圾郵件”數據的垃圾場的想法並不感到興奮。他們擔心此更改向垃圾郵件發送者發出了公開邀請，可能會堵塞區塊鏈並為普通用戶增加交易費用。而且，不要忘記害怕非法材料進入區塊鏈，可能會引起不需要的監管審查。對於他們來說，比特幣應該是一件事，只有一件事：貨幣交易。

The Bitcoin Core Rebuttal: Practicality and Incentives

比特幣核心反駁：實用性和激勵措施

On the other side of the coin, Bitcoin Core developers argue that the OP_RETURN method is the least harmful way to store arbitrary data on the blockchain. They reckon that limiting OP_RETURN might just push people towards even more problematic methods, like Inscriptions. Plus, they believe that the incentives of the system will eventually sort things out. Monetary transactions are small, while data storage is bulky. As demand for monetary transactions increases, using Bitcoin for data storage will become too expensive, effectively pricing out the spammers.

在硬幣的另一側，比特幣核心開發人員認為，op_ternurn方法是將任意數據存儲在區塊鏈上的最小有害方法。他們認為，限制OP_RETURN可能只是將人們推向更多有問題的方法，例如銘文。另外，他們認為系統的激勵措施最終將解決問題。貨幣交易很小，而數據存儲量很大。隨著對貨幣交易的需求增加，使用比特幣進行數據存儲將變得太昂貴，有效地定價了垃圾郵件發送者。

The Legal Angle: A Potential Pandora's Box?

法律角度：潛在的潘多拉盒子？

But wait, there's more! Some legal eagles are raising concerns about the legal implications of larger OP_RETURN outputs. The argument? By accepting larger OP_RETURN transactions, node operators could inadvertently open themselves up to legal liability for hosting illegal content. While the potential for CSAM on the blockchain isn't new, some argue that the general acceptance of larger OP_RETURN transactions changes the implicit nature of operating a full node, making node operators more vulnerable.

但是等等，還有更多！一些法律老鷹正在引起人們對較大op_ternurn產出的法律含義的擔憂。論點？通過接受較大的OP_Return交易，節點運營商可以無意中承擔託管非法內容的法律責任。儘管在區塊鏈上的CSAM的潛力並不是什麼新鮮事物，但有人認為，較大的OP_Return交易的一般接受會改變操作完整節點的隱含性質，從而使節點運算符更加脆弱。

However, most legal experts seem to think these fears are overblown. As one unnamed crypto lawyer put it, “It is already an issue, yes, and the fact that this kind of attack hasn’t happened yet is a question of luck rather than capability.” The real threat, according to some, is politicians using these narratives to attack Bitcoin for political ends.

但是，大多數法律專家似乎認為這些恐懼是誇張的。正如一位未命名的加密律師律師所說：“這已經是一個問題，是的，這種攻擊還沒有發生的事實是運氣的問題，而不是能力。”據某些人說，真正的威脅是政治家使用這些敘述來攻擊比特幣以實現政治目的。

So, What's the Bottom Line?

那麼，最重要的是什麼？

The Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots debate highlights a fundamental tension within the Bitcoin community: What should Bitcoin be used for? Is it purely a tool for monetary transactions, or is it something more? There's no easy answer, and the debate is likely to rage on. Bitcoin Core has reversed their plan to deprecate the user configurability of OP_RETURN’s default datacarriersize just hours before the scheduled release of Core version 30 (v30), signaling a slight victory for a dissident movement led by Knots node operators.

比特幣核心與比特幣結的辯論突出了比特幣社區內的基本張力：應該使用比特幣？它純粹是貨幣交易的工具，還是更多？沒有簡單的答案，辯論可能會激起。比特幣核心（Bitcoin Core）逆轉了他們的計劃，以貶低OP_Return的默認DataCarriers的用戶可配置性在預定版本30（V30）（V30）之前的幾個小時，這表明了由結節點運算符引起的持不同政見運動的勝利。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

Personally, I think the Bitcoin Core developers have a point about practicality. Trying to play whack-a-mole with data storage methods seems like a losing game. However, the legal concerns are worth taking seriously. Perhaps the best approach is a combination of technical solutions and clear legal frameworks to protect node operators.

就個人而言，我認為比特幣核心開發人員對實用性有一點觀點。嘗試使用數據存儲方法玩whack-a-mole似乎是一個失敗的遊戲。但是，法律問題值得認真對待。也許最好的方法是技術解決方案和明確的法律框架來保護節點操作員。

The Grand Finale

大結局

At the end of the day, the Bitcoin community is a vibrant and opinionated bunch. Whether you're Team Bitcoin Core or Team Bitcoin Knots, one thing's for sure: the debate around OP_RETURN is a reminder that Bitcoin is still evolving. So, grab your popcorn, buckle up, and enjoy the show. After all, in the world of Bitcoin, there's never a dull moment. And hey, maybe all this drama will just make Bitcoin stronger in the long run. Or maybe not. Only time will tell. But one thing's for sure: it's never boring!

歸根結底，比特幣社區是一群充滿活力的。無論您是團隊比特幣核心還是比特幣結，肯定是一件事：圍繞OP_Return的辯論提醒比特幣仍在不斷發展。因此，抓住您的爆米花，搭扣，享受節目。畢竟，在比特幣世界中，從來沒有一個沉悶的時刻。嘿，也許所有這些戲劇將使比特幣長期更強大。也許不是。只有時間會證明。但是可以肯定的是：這永遠不會無聊！