比特币核心，OP_Return和拒绝死亡的辩论：纽约人

比特币社区对比特币核心30.0和OP_Return处于潮湿状态。是小调整还是湿滑的斜坡？让我们分解，纽约人的风格。

The Bitcoin world is buzzing, and not in a good way. The latest Bitcoin Core release, version 30.0, has stirred up a real hornet's nest, all thanks to some tweaks around OP_RETURN. What's OP_RETURN, you ask? Think of it as Bitcoin's version of a digital graffiti wall, where folks can embed all sorts of data. And now, Bitcoin Core is about to make that wall a whole lot bigger. Buckle up, because this is about to get interesting.

比特币世界嗡嗡作响，不是很好。最新的比特币核心版本版本30.0激起了真正的大黄蜂的巢穴，这要归功于OP_Return周围的一些调整。你问什么是op_return？将其视为比特币的数字涂鸦墙的版本，人们可以在其中嵌入各种数据。而现在，比特币核心即将使那堵墙变得更大。系好，因为这将变得有趣。

The Heart of the Matter: Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots

问题的核心：比特币核心与比特币结

So, what's the fuss? Bitcoin Core 30.0 is set to relay transactions with larger OP_RETURN outputs by default. Sounds minor, right? Wrong. This seemingly small change has sparked a major rift, with some users threatening to ditch Bitcoin Core altogether for Bitcoin Knots, a software fork maintained by the ever-vocal Luke Dashjr. The core of the debate? Whether Bitcoin should be in the business of facilitating arbitrary data storage.

那么，大惊小怪？默认情况下，比特币核心30.0设置为带有较大OP_Return输出的交易。听起来很小，对吗？错误的。这种看似很小的变化引发了一个重大的裂痕，一些用户威胁要放弃比特币结的抛弃比特币结，这是一个由众多的卢克·达什吉（Luke Dashjr）维护的软件分叉。辩论的核心？比特币是否应该从事促进任意数据存储的业务。

The Bitcoin Knots Stance: Keep Bitcoin Pure

比特币结的立场：保持比特币纯净

The Bitcoin Knots crew views this as the beginning of the end. They're not thrilled about the idea of Bitcoin being used as a dumping ground for “spam” data. They worry that this change signals an open invitation to spammers, potentially clogging up the blockchain and driving up transaction fees for regular users. And let's not forget the fear of illicit materials finding their way onto the blockchain, potentially inviting unwanted regulatory scrutiny. For them, Bitcoin should be about one thing and one thing only: monetary transactions.

比特币结的工作人员将其视为终点的开始。他们对比特币被用作“垃圾邮件”数据的垃圾场的想法并不感到兴奋。他们担心此更改向垃圾邮件发送者发出了公开邀请，可能会堵塞区块链并为普通用户增加交易费用。而且，不要忘记害怕非法材料进入区块链，可能会引起不需要的监管审查。对于他们来说，比特币应该是一件事，只有一件事：货币交易。

The Bitcoin Core Rebuttal: Practicality and Incentives

比特币核心反驳：实用性和激励措施

On the other side of the coin, Bitcoin Core developers argue that the OP_RETURN method is the least harmful way to store arbitrary data on the blockchain. They reckon that limiting OP_RETURN might just push people towards even more problematic methods, like Inscriptions. Plus, they believe that the incentives of the system will eventually sort things out. Monetary transactions are small, while data storage is bulky. As demand for monetary transactions increases, using Bitcoin for data storage will become too expensive, effectively pricing out the spammers.

在硬币的另一侧，比特币核心开发人员认为，op_ternurn方法是将任意数据存储在区块链上的最小有害方法。他们认为，限制OP_RETURN可能只是将人们推向更多有问题的方法，例如铭文。另外，他们认为系统的激励措施最终将解决问题。货币交易很小，而数据存储量很大。随着对货币交易的需求增加，使用比特币进行数据存储将变得太昂贵，有效地定价了垃圾邮件发送者。

The Legal Angle: A Potential Pandora's Box?

法律角度：潜在的潘多拉盒子？

But wait, there's more! Some legal eagles are raising concerns about the legal implications of larger OP_RETURN outputs. The argument? By accepting larger OP_RETURN transactions, node operators could inadvertently open themselves up to legal liability for hosting illegal content. While the potential for CSAM on the blockchain isn't new, some argue that the general acceptance of larger OP_RETURN transactions changes the implicit nature of operating a full node, making node operators more vulnerable.

但是等等，还有更多！一些法律老鹰正在引起人们对较大op_ternurn产出的法律含义的担忧。论点？通过接受较大的OP_Return交易，节点运营商可以无意中承担托管非法内容的法律责任。尽管在区块链上的CSAM的潜力并不是什么新鲜事物，但有人认为，较大的OP_Return交易的一般接受会改变操作完整节点的隐含性质，从而使节点运算符更加脆弱。

However, most legal experts seem to think these fears are overblown. As one unnamed crypto lawyer put it, “It is already an issue, yes, and the fact that this kind of attack hasn’t happened yet is a question of luck rather than capability.” The real threat, according to some, is politicians using these narratives to attack Bitcoin for political ends.

但是，大多数法律专家似乎认为这些恐惧是夸张的。正如一位未命名的加密律师律师所说：“这已经是一个问题，是的，这种攻击还没有发生的事实是运气的问题，而不是能力。”据某些人说，真正的威胁是政治家使用这些叙述来攻击比特币以实现政治目的。

So, What's the Bottom Line?

那么，最重要的是什么？

The Bitcoin Core vs. Bitcoin Knots debate highlights a fundamental tension within the Bitcoin community: What should Bitcoin be used for? Is it purely a tool for monetary transactions, or is it something more? There's no easy answer, and the debate is likely to rage on. Bitcoin Core has reversed their plan to deprecate the user configurability of OP_RETURN’s default datacarriersize just hours before the scheduled release of Core version 30 (v30), signaling a slight victory for a dissident movement led by Knots node operators.

比特币核心与比特币结的辩论突出了比特币社区内的基本张力：应该使用比特币？它纯粹是货币交易的工具，还是更多？没有简单的答案，辩论可能会激起。比特币核心（Bitcoin Core）逆转了他们的计划，以贬低OP_Return的默认DataCarriers的用户可配置性在预定版本30（V30）（V30）之前的几个小时，这表明了由结节点运算符引起的持不同政见运动的胜利。

My Two Satoshis

我的两个satoshis

Personally, I think the Bitcoin Core developers have a point about practicality. Trying to play whack-a-mole with data storage methods seems like a losing game. However, the legal concerns are worth taking seriously. Perhaps the best approach is a combination of technical solutions and clear legal frameworks to protect node operators.

就个人而言，我认为比特币核心开发人员对实用性有一点观点。尝试使用数据存储方法玩whack-a-mole似乎是一个失败的游戏。但是，法律问题值得认真对待。也许最好的方法是技术解决方案和明确的法律框架来保护节点操作员。

The Grand Finale

大结局

At the end of the day, the Bitcoin community is a vibrant and opinionated bunch. Whether you're Team Bitcoin Core or Team Bitcoin Knots, one thing's for sure: the debate around OP_RETURN is a reminder that Bitcoin is still evolving. So, grab your popcorn, buckle up, and enjoy the show. After all, in the world of Bitcoin, there's never a dull moment. And hey, maybe all this drama will just make Bitcoin stronger in the long run. Or maybe not. Only time will tell. But one thing's for sure: it's never boring!

归根结底，比特币社区是一群充满活力的。无论您是团队比特币核心还是比特币结，肯定是一件事：围绕OP_Return的辩论提醒比特币仍在不断发展。因此，抓住您的爆米花，搭扣，享受节目。毕竟，在比特币世界中，从来没有一个沉闷的时刻。嘿，也许所有这些戏剧将使比特币长期更强大。也许不是。只有时间会证明。但是可以肯定的是：这永远不会无聊！