比特幣（BTC）垃圾郵件發送者將破產：Saifedean Ammous提出了賞金計劃

經濟學家和比特幣標準的作者，塞菲德·普及（Saifedean Ammous），在正在進行的有關垃圾郵件銘文的辯論中加重了

Economist and author of The Bitcoin Standard, Saifedean Ammous, has suggested he would “throw in a few sats” to fund a full-time developer focused on making Bitcoin spamming more difficult and expensive.

經濟學家和比特幣標準的作者塞菲德（Saifedean Ammous）建議他“投入幾個SAT”，以資助專注於使比特幣更加困難和昂貴的專職開發人員。

Ammous made the remarks on Monday, continuing an exchange with programmers over measures to counter spam inscriptions in the Bitcoin network.

Ammous在周一發表了講話，繼續與程序員進行交流，討論與比特幣網絡中垃圾郵件銘文的措施。

The discussion was sparked by pseudonymous developer GrassFedBitcoin, who called for Bitcoin Core to merge pull request #28408, which would enable node operators to filter inscriptions more easily.

假名開發人員Grassfedbitcoin引發了討論，他呼籲比特幣核心合併拉力請求＃28408，這將使節點操作員更容易過濾銘文。

According to GrassFedBitcoin, the lack of inscription filtering tools contributes to unnecessary blockchain bloat and undermines Bitcoin (BTC)‘s role as a monetary protocol.

根據Grassfedbitcoin的說法，缺乏銘文過濾工具有助於不必要的區塊鏈膨脹，並破壞比特幣（BTC）作為貨幣方案的作用。

“No one running a node wants to relay inscriptions,” he wrote, arguing that the OP_RETURN limit increases were justified in the past under false assumptions. He pushed for a configurable, default policy discouraging the use of Bitcoin for storing JPEGs rather than monetary data.

他寫道：“沒有人想要傳遞節點銘文，”他認為，過去的op_ter_ter_ter_retner限制在錯誤的假設下是合理的。他推動了一項可配置的默認策略，勸阻將比特幣用於存儲JPEG而不是貨幣數據。

Blockstream CEO Adam Back challenged the proposal, describing inscription filtering as an “arms race.” He noted that spam data embedded in Bitcoin transactions can be endlessly modified using code structures, requiring constant updates to filtering tools.

Blockstream首席執行官亞當（Adam）退縮了該提案，將銘文過濾描述為“武器競賽”。他指出，嵌入在比特幣交易中的垃圾郵件數據可以使用代碼結構無休止地修改，這需要對過濾工具的持續更新。

Ammous compares Bitcoin spam to email

大量比較比特幣垃圾郵件與電子郵件

Ammous compared the Bitcoin spam issue to email spam — another arms race society continues to fight without abandoning the system.

大鬆散將比特幣垃圾郵件問題與電子郵件垃圾郵件進行了比較 - 另一個軍備競賽協會繼續戰鬥而沒有放棄該系統。

“It’s not easy, but it’s worth trying to help bankrupt the spammers faster,” Ammous said. He argued that fighting spam is not censorship, noting that node operators already reject invalid transactions.

“這並不容易，但值得嘗試幫助更快地破產垃圾郵件發送者。”他認為打架不是審查制度，並指出節點運營商已經拒絕了無效的交易。

The debate drew commentary from other users. One participant suggested Core developers treat spam-coding employees at certain startups as “unwilling QA engineers” and simply unstandardize every trick they deploy.

辯論引起了其他用戶的評論。一位參與者建議核心開發人員將某些初創公司的垃圾郵件編碼員工視為“不願意的QA工程師”，而只是簡單地將他們部署的每個技巧都取消了。

Ammous took it further, proposing to “deprecate” the work of developers building spam tools and even hiring outside coders to overwhelm their systems.

Ammous將其進一步發展，建議“貶低”開發人員建立垃圾郵件工具的工作，甚至僱用外部編碼人員淹沒他們的系統。

The conversation reflects ongoing tensions in the Bitcoin community over the network’s intended use. With inscriptions continuing to congest the network, calls for technical countermeasures — and pointed critiques of those defending spam — are growing louder.

對話反映了比特幣社區在網絡預期使用方面的持續緊張局勢。隨著銘文繼續使網絡充滿擁擠，呼籲技術對策 - 對捍衛垃圾郵件的人的尖銳批評正在越來越大。

In a February 4 report, Mempool Research said the adoption of inscriptions could drive the Bitcoin network’s average block size as high as 4 megabytes (MB) per block, far higher than current averages.

在2月4日的報告中，Mempool Research表示，銘文的採用可能會使比特幣網絡的平均塊大小高達4兆字節（MB），遠高於當前平均值。

Bitcoin’s average block size — the amount of data in each block posted to the network’s public ledger — is currently around 1.5 MB.

比特幣的平均塊大小 - 張貼在網絡公共分類帳中的每個塊中的數據量 - 目前約為1.5 MB。