Binance移至駁回FTX的$ 1.76B回扣訴訟

在5月16日提起的法律反駁中，加密貨幣交易所均要求特拉華州破產法院駁回17.6億美元的回扣訴訟

Key Notes

關鍵說明

* Crypto exchange Binance has asked a Delaware bankruptcy court to dismiss a $1.76 billion clawback lawsuit brought by the FTX estate.

*加密貨幣交易所（Crypto Exchange Binance）已要求特拉華州破產法院駁回FTX莊園提起的17.6億美元的回扣訴訟。

* The motion, filed on May 16, sees Binance arguing that the lawsuit is “legally deficient” and based on speculation.

*該動議於5月16日提出，認為binance認為該訴訟是“法律上不足”的，並且基於猜測。

* The FTX estate is now seeking to recover the funds from a 2021 transaction in which FTX repurchased Binance’s 20% equity stake using a mix of crypto assets.

* FTX Estate現在正在尋求從2021年的交易中收回資金，在該交易中，FTX使用加密資產的混合物回購了Binance的20％股權。

The world’s leading centralized crypto exchange, Binance, is pressing for a dismissal of a $1.76 billion clawback lawsuit brought by the FTX estate, as reported by May 16 filings with a Delaware bankruptcy court.

正如5月16日報導，全球領先的集中加密交易所Binance Binance迫使FTX遺產提起的17.6億美元的回扣訴訟被駁回，這是5月16日向特拉華州破產法院提交的報導。

In the motion to dismiss, Binance’s lawyers stated that the lawsuit is “legally deficient” and stems from an incomplete perspective, adding that the claims are based on a convicted fraudster’s,, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), incomplete and skewed recollections.

在解僱的動議中，畢業生的律師表示，訴訟“法律上不足”，並源於不完整的角度，並補充說，這些索賠是基於被定罪的欺詐者，Sam Bankman Fried（SBF）（SBF），不完整和偏斜的重新記錄。

The dispute arises from a 2021 transaction in which FTX bought back Binance’s 20% equity stake using a combination of crypto assets, including FTX’s native FTT token, BUSD, and BNB.

爭議源於2021年的交易，其中FTX使用加密資產的組合（包括FTX的本地FTT代幣，BUSD和BNB）購買了Binance的20％股權股份。

The FTX estate asserts that the transaction was funded with misappropriated customer funds and that FTX was already insolvent at the time, claims which Binance vehemently denies.

FTX莊園斷言該交易是由盜用客戶資金資助的，而FTX當時已經無力償債，這是binance迫切否認的。

The motion further highlights that the FTX estate's narrative is a fabrication designed to deflect blame from SBF and shift it onto Binance.

該動議進一步凸顯了FTX莊園的敘述是一種旨在將SBF責備並將其轉移到Binance上的製造。

The lawsuit accuses Binance of being unjustly enriched through the $1.76 billion deal and actively participating in FTX’s downfall. It alleges that Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) maliciously triggered a fatal run on the exchange with a November 2022 tweet announcing the liquidation of FTI’s FTT holdings.

該訴訟指控義務通過17.6億美元的交易不公正地充實並積極參與FTX的倒台。它聲稱Binance首席執行官Changpeng Zhao（CZ）惡意觸發了交易所的致命奔跑，2022年11月的一條推文宣布清算FTI的FTT Holdings。

The move, according to the lawsuit, prompted massive withdrawals and ultimately forced the struggling exchange into bankruptcy.

根據訴訟，此舉促使大規模撤離，並最終迫使苦苦掙扎的交流破產。

However, Binance strongly contests this narrative. Its lawyers argue that FTX continued to operate for 16 months after the 2021 transaction, rendering it impossible for the deal to have caused FTX’s collapse.

但是，Binance強烈反對這種敘述。它的律師認為，在2021年交易後，FTX繼續運作16個月，這使得該交易不可能導致FTX崩潰。

Moreover, they maintain that CZ’s tweet was not an act of malice but rather a reaction to valid market concerns, specifically a November 2, 2022 CoinDesk article which revealed troubling details about Alameda Research’s balance sheet, leading to the decision to sell the remaining FTT at the time.

此外，他們堅持認為CZ的推文不是惡意行為，而是對有效市場問題的反應，特別是2022年11月2日的Coindesk文章，揭示了有關阿拉米達研究資產負債表的令人不安的細節，導致決定在當時出售剩餘的FTT。

The motion from Binance also criticizes the FTX estate's attempt to "shift the blame" for its spectacular collapse onto external actors. It adds that Bankman-Fried, not Binance, was at the helm of what a federal judge has called "one of the most massive corporate frauds in history."

Binance的動議還批評了FTX莊園試圖將其巨大的崩潰“責備”到外部演員中。它補充說，班克曼（Bankman）炸了而不是binance，是聯邦法官稱之為“歷史上最龐大的公司欺詐之一”的掌舵人。

SBF was sentenced to 25 years in prison earlier this year on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy after being found guilty of misusing billions in customer funds and lying to investors, regulators, and the public.

SBF今年早些時候被判處25年徒刑，罪名是七項欺詐和陰謀罪名成立，因為被判犯有數十億美元的客戶資金，並向投資者，監管機構和公眾撒謊。

The motion claims that the estate's assertions are a "legal fiction" designed to circumvent the time limit for filing clawback suits. It adds that the FTX estate is effectively pretending that the exchange's collapse wasn't the result of internal rot but an outside conspiracy, a claim they say is unsupported by fact or law.

該動議聲稱該遺產的主張是一種“法律小說”，旨在規避備案訴訟的時間限制。它補充說，FTX遺產有效地假裝交易所的崩潰不是內部腐爛的結果，而是外部陰謀，他們說的聲稱不受事實或法律的支持。