美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 承認加密資產證券存在錯誤

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 最近提出請求，要求修改其對幣安、Binance.US 和聯合創始人趙長鵬的原始投訴。

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a motion to amend its original complaint in the ongoing legal battle with Binance, Binance.US, and co-founder Changpeng "CZ" Zhao. This updated filing comes after a recent district court ruling denied crypto exchange Kraken’s attempt to dismiss similar allegations.

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 已提出動議，修改其與幣安、Binance.US 和聯合創始人趙長鵬「CZ」正在進行的法律訴訟中的原始申訴。在這份更新的文件發布之前，地方法院最近的一項裁決駁回了加密貨幣交易所 Kraken 試圖駁回類似指控的請求。

In a bombshell revelation, the SEC has now dropped its claim that ten major crypto tokens, including Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), and Polygon (MATIC), are considered securities. This marks a significant shift in the regulatory body's stance.

爆炸性消息是，美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 現已放棄將 Solana (SOL)、Cardano (ADA) 和 Polygon (MATIC) 等 10 種主要加密代幣視為證券的說法。這標誌著監理機關立場的重大轉變。

This change comes as a response to the recent court decision in the Kraken case, where the SEC's broad definitions faced significant judicial pushback. The updated complaint aims to correct earlier misunderstandings and align with the court's findings.

這項變更是對法院最近對 Kraken 案判決的回應，在該案中，美國證券交易委員會的廣泛定義面臨司法的重大阻力。更新後的申訴旨在糾正先前的誤解並與法院的調查結果保持一致。

The newly filed documents include a redlined version of the proposed amended complaint, showing exactly what has been changed. The SEC has also included the court order from the Kraken case to provide context and clarity on its revised position.

新提交的文件包括擬議修訂投訴的紅線版本，準確顯示了已更改的內容。美國證券交易委員會還納入了 Kraken 案的法院命令，以提供其修訂立場的背景和清晰度。

Coinbase CLO Responds to SEC Filing on X

Coinbase CLO 回應 SEC 關於 X 的文件

Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer at Coinbase, quickly responded to the SEC's filing on X, pointing out an important note in the updated complaint. Grewal highlighted that the SEC has now acknowledged it may have confused certain tokens as securities. This marks a significant shift in the SEC's position.

Coinbase 首席法務官 Paul Grewal 迅速回應了 SEC 在 X 上提交的文件，並指出了更新後的投訴中的一個重要說明。 Grewal 強調，美國證券交易委員會現已承認，它可能將某些代幣與證券混淆了。這標誌著 SEC 立場的重大轉變。

"The SEC finally admits that 1/ "crypto asset security" is a made up term and 2/ to prove a "crypto asset security" is an investment contract, the SEC needs evidence of a bundle of "contracts, expectations, and understandings"? Think it's time for @SECgov to admit it has… https://t.co/iJIYTnNvxs pic.twitter.com/E58Pft7irc"

「SEC 最終承認 1/「加密資產證券」是一個虛構的術語，2/為了證明「加密資產證券」是投資合同，SEC 需要一系列「合約、期望和理解」的證據認為@SECgov 是時候承認它了… https://t.co/iJIYTnNvxs pic.twitter.com/E58Pft7irc”

Meanwhile, Ripple's Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty commented on the filing, observing that while Ethereum (ETH) seems to have avoided the SEC's scrutiny, the ten tokens still face regulatory challenges.

與此同時，Ripple 首席法務官 Stuart Alderoty 對這份文件發表了評論，他指出，雖然以太坊 (ETH) 似乎避開了 SEC 的審查，但這十種代幣仍然面臨監管挑戰。

"The SEC seems to have finally realized that ETH can no longer be called a security after the Supreme Court ruling. However, the tokens on this list (X) are still subject to the SEC's overreach. But don't worry, the SEC will continue to allege that these assets are sold as investment contracts and will pursue regulatory enforcement against them. Pay no attention to the fact that the tokens are fully functional and decentralized with thriving communities and use cases. According to the SEC, that doesn’t matter. Only their definition of an 'investment contract' matters. And they will use that definition to continue their witch hunt against crypto."

「在最高法院的裁決之後，SEC 似乎終於意識到 ETH 不能再被稱為證券。不過，這份清單（X）上的代幣仍然受到 SEC 的越權管轄。不過不用擔心，SEC 會繼續聲稱這些資產作為投資合約出售，並將對其進行監管執法，而無需關注這些代幣功能齊全且去中心化且社區和用例蓬勃發展的事實，這並不重要。 ，他們將利用這個定義繼續對加密貨幣進行政治迫害。

However, the SEC continues to allege that these assets are sold as investment contracts and will pursue regulatory enforcement against them.

然而，美國證券交易委員會繼續聲稱這些資產作為投資合約出售，並將對其進行監管執法。