Market Cap: $2.0575T -1.60%
Volume(24h): $93.8402B 1.23%
  • Market Cap: $2.0575T -1.60%
  • Volume(24h): $93.8402B 1.23%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.0575T -1.60%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

TGEs, Blockchains, and the Future: Navigating the Shifting Sands of Web3

Sep 22, 2025 at 09:27 pm

Explore the evolving landscape of TGEs, blockchains, and the future of Web3, analyzing recent trends, founder exits, and innovative projects.

TGEs, Blockchains, and the Future: Navigating the Shifting Sands of Web3

The world of TGEs (Token Generation Events), blockchains, and the future of Web3 is constantly evolving. Recent dynamics have seen increased scrutiny of TGEs, innovative approaches to blockchain scaling, and exciting developments in Web3 gaming.

TGEs Under the Microscope: Exit Ramps or Launchpads?

Token Generation Events, once celebrated as launchpads for ambitious blockchain projects, are now facing criticism. Are they genuinely designed to foster long-term ecosystem growth, or are they merely becoming exit ramps for crypto founders?

A concerning trend has emerged: founders stepping away from their projects soon after the TGE. This raises questions about their initial intentions and commitment to the long-term vision of the blockchain. As Brian Huang, co-founder of Glider, aptly puts it, "In reality, the token launch is supposed to be the start of the project."

Investor Sterling Campbell from Blockchain Capital rightly points out that founder exits aren't always malicious. Founder fatigue, misaligned incentives, and the stark realization that product-market fit is lacking are all potential factors.

However, the data doesn't lie. Messari's research indicates that tokens with higher insider allocations tend to perform worse. This raises concerns about the fairness and sustainability of many TGE models.

The Question of Too Many Blockchains

The sheer volume of TGEs also begs the question: do we really need more blockchains? Annabelle Huang from Altius Labs suggests that while we may not need more general-purpose blockchains, there's definitely room for networks designed for specific use cases.

Projects like Hyperliquid, which focused on building a derivatives exchange before verticalizing into its own chain, exemplify this shift. They demonstrate real-world usage and provide a compelling reason for their existence. In contrast, many new layer 1s and layer 2s launch without a clear breakout app to justify their TGE.

The pressure on long-term supporters is immense. The sheer volume of tokens scheduled to unlock in the coming years – estimated at $155 billion by 2030 – creates persistent selling pressure that can be difficult to overcome.

Boundless: Scaling Blockchains Like the Internet

While some question the need for more blockchains, others are focused on improving the scalability and efficiency of existing ones. Boundless, with its recent mainnet activation, is tackling this challenge head-on.

Boundless aims to mirror the internet’s scaling model by using zero-knowledge computation as the engine of scale. Their approach involves rewarding provers for generating verifiable proofs, a departure from traditional block mining.

Their Proof of Verifiable Work and ZK Coin (ZKC) are designed to create a market for verifiable compute, aligning incentives with tangible, valuable output.

Dæmons: Web3 Gaming Innovation

Innovation isn't limited to blockchain infrastructure. Projects like Dæmons, an AI-powered web3 battler, are pushing the boundaries of gaming.

Dæmons enhances the gaming experience by transforming players’ blockchain histories into personalized and evolving digital companions. This unique approach integrates the blockchain aspect deeply into the gameplay.

With its play-to-progress model and strategic development pillars, Dæmons aims to create a fun, engaging, and sustainable gaming ecosystem.

The Future is Unwritten

The future of TGEs, blockchains, and Web3 is far from certain. The industry is grappling with challenges like founder exits, unsustainable tokenomics, and the need for greater scalability.

But, hey, at least we've got AI-powered blockchain battlers to keep us entertained while we figure it all out. One thing's for sure: it's gonna be a wild ride! Keep your eyes peeled, folks, because the next big thing in Web3 could be just around the corner.

Original source:tradingview

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jun 27, 2026