Market Cap: $2.2043T 0.58%
Volume(24h): $56.8553B 3.76%
  • Market Cap: $2.2043T 0.58%
  • Volume(24h): $56.8553B 3.76%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.2043T 0.58%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Maker (Now Sky) Proposed a Token Freezing Function, Sparking Controversy in the Community

Sep 04, 2024 at 06:00 pm

Co-founder Rune Christensen made a proposal to introduce a token freezing function to the USDS (DAI) stablecoin. The function would allow the project to lock tokens on the blockchain in an address that cannot be used.

Maker (Now Sky) Proposed a Token Freezing Function, Sparking Controversy in the Community

Maker (now Sky) is a DAO, and as such, any proposals to modify the protocol must be approved by the community before coming into effect.

In a recent proposal, Christensen suggested introducing a token freezing function, which would allow USDS (DAI) to be frozen if necessary.

However, this feature would be much more decentralized than the freezing available on centralized stablecoins, and it would have a decentralized appeal process, similar to that of a court.

According to Christensen, this proposal has been fiercely criticized because it lends itself to real political actions against someone, which is absurd to imagine within a decentralized system.

However, it could be useful, for example, to prevent criminals from using stolen funds.

Christensen also pointed out that, unlike centralized projects, a truly decentralized decision-making process that led to the freezing of tokens would be at least public and transparent.

For example, a user who sees their USDS frozen could leverage the power of decentralized governance to verify that the decision was the result of a fair process.

This process, according to Christensen, should go through decentralized governance to obtain a transparent reason on why the funds were frozen.

His idea is that the decentralized protocol of Sky can make objective decisions on objective matters, simply by using fixed and public rules.

Original source:cryptonomist

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Aug 11, 2026