The European Union puts an end to anonymity in crypto transactions.

From July 1, 2027, any transfer above €1,000 will be required to disclose the precise identity of the sender and recipient.

The European Union is putting an end to anonymity in crypto transactions. From July 1, 2027, any transfer above €1,000 will require disclosing the precise identity of the sender and recipient. This measure, part of the new anti-money laundering rules (AMLR), now clearly place blockchain and digital assets under the direct supervision of European authorities, as stated by Paschal Donohoe, president of the Eurogroup. For crypto enthusiasts, this measure represents both a necessary revolution and a painful betrayal.

Imposed Transparency: Towards a Generalized Registry of Crypto Wallets

First, the European Union will require all providers of crypto-asset related services to systematically record sender and recipient data.

Centralized platforms such as exchanges and custodial wallets will now have to collect and retain this information, just as banks already do during regular transfers.

Moreover, even self-custodial wallets will be affected. For each transaction exceeding the €1,000 threshold, users will have to answer a series of questions: identity, source of funds, etc.

This regulatory obligation has the stated goal of combating illicit transactions, but it definitively buries the original anonymity promised by Bitcoin and crypto from their inception.

Furthermore, the European Crypto Initiative highlights that financial intelligence units will now have “direct, immediate, and unfiltered” access to transactional data.

Traceability will then become instantaneous. For the authorities, this measure represents a crucial lever in the fight against organized crime, while privacy advocates see it as an unprecedented threat.

Innovation or Infringement on Privacy?

This new European regulation is causing a real outcry within the crypto community. Riccardo Spagni, a prominent figure of Monero, strongly denounces these “intrusive” measures. Crypto-assets ensuring enhanced anonymity are now among the assets excluded from authorized European platforms. According to him, this represents a direct attack on the foundations of digital privacy.

On his side, James Toledano, CTO of Unity Wallet, is particularly concerned about the unintended effects on the decentralized crypto ecosystem.

He believes that equating crypto-assets with traditional financial services betrays the very spirit of peer-to-peer.

The risk also exists that offshore transactions and clandestine P2P exchanges will thrive in the shadows, recalling the turbulent earliest days of the crypto sector.

Crypto and Regulation: Catalyst for New Technologies?

However, far from being a mere constraint, this regulation could also stimulate the emergence of innovative technological solutions within the crypto universe. KYC attestations based on zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) are already being considered.

These systems would allow user authentication without fully revealing their personal data.

Solutions such as Layer 2 (secondary layers) and threshold signatures could also represent an effective compromise between imposed transparency and preserved privacy.

Thus, these constraints could paradoxically spur innovation in the crypto universe by fostering the development of safer and more privacy-respecting solutions — provided technology progresses fast enough to adapt, without regulators crossing the red line of outright banning Bitcoin.