Market Cap: $3.774T 1.890%
Volume(24h): $117.0644B 9.650%
  • Market Cap: $3.774T 1.890%
  • Volume(24h): $117.0644B 9.650%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.774T 1.890%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$114759.887876 USD

1.15%

ethereum
ethereum

$3567.012478 USD

3.57%

xrp
xrp

$3.011311 USD

6.59%

tether
tether

$1.000079 USD

0.03%

bnb
bnb

$755.879920 USD

1.64%

solana
solana

$164.217689 USD

2.21%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999865 USD

-0.01%

tron
tron

$0.327478 USD

1.21%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.202566 USD

3.38%

cardano
cardano

$0.738623 USD

3.60%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$38.685825 USD

3.16%

stellar
stellar

$0.412969 USD

10.27%

sui
sui

$3.496145 USD

2.58%

chainlink
chainlink

$16.602360 USD

4.54%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$550.336635 USD

4.06%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

🔄 Commonalities and ⚖️ Key Differences Between PENGU and DOOD Tokens

May 13, 2025 at 11:38 pm

🔄 Commonalities and ⚖️ Key Differences Between PENGU and DOOD Tokens

Both tokens launched on Solana aiming to take advantage of its speed and low transaction fees, especially pertinent given the large community focus and significant community token allocation in both cases. Moreover, both are tied directly to their respective NFT projects, designed to reward holders and expand ecosystem utility.

However, the timing of the launches couldn't be more different. Pengu launched in December, hoping to capitalize on year-end market activity. On the other hand, Dood encountered difficulties right from the start despite launching in May.

Another key difference lies in the token utility. Pengu quickly integrated with physical products and brand partnerships, ranging from cookware to Walmart and Amazon, making the token broadly useful in multiple domains.

Doodles, however, is still in the early phases of defining its token's real-world utility, focusing initially on providing benefits within the Doodles ecosystem such as priority mint and community voting rights.

The initial market reception to both tokens also varied. Pengu showed better resilience after initial volatility, likely due to the immediate value propositions offered by the token in physical products and mainstream brands. Dood, on the other hand, is still striving to find its footing in the market, juggling initial hype with the ongoing delivery of utility and use cases.

Overall, both Pengu and Dood represent interesting moves by their parent NFT projects to expand beyond digital art into full-fledged ecosystems. While Pengu appears to have found stronger footing through tangible product integrations and wider brand appeal, Doodles' journey is just beginning, and its success will largely depend on how effectively the Doodles team delivers real-world utility and use cases to sustain the initial enthusiasm. For investors and collectors, keeping a close eye on the development of each ecosystem will be crucial as the NFT space continues to blend with mainstream consumer markets.

Original source:cryptoticker

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Aug 05, 2025