Market Cap: $3.2924T -0.700%
Volume(24h): $104.5091B -6.310%
  • Market Cap: $3.2924T -0.700%
  • Volume(24h): $104.5091B -6.310%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.2924T -0.700%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$105074.528045 USD

-0.43%

ethereum
ethereum

$2621.549395 USD

0.28%

tether
tether

$1.000419 USD

-0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.211361 USD

-1.68%

bnb
bnb

$666.078228 USD

-0.14%

solana
solana

$153.930846 USD

-1.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999839 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.190358 USD

-2.34%

tron
tron

$0.272783 USD

1.19%

cardano
cardano

$0.674344 USD

-2.95%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$35.522762 USD

-2.63%

sui
sui

$3.202047 USD

-2.04%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.919736 USD

-2.44%

avalanche
avalanche

$20.239832 USD

-5.54%

stellar
stellar

$0.268004 USD

-2.06%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Coinbase Collected Face Scans of Users Without Consent, Violating Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, New Class-Action Alleges

May 15, 2025 at 01:10 am

Coinbase Global Inc. collected face scans of users of its cryptocurrency platform without their consent

Coinbase Collected Face Scans of Users Without Consent, Violating Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, New Class-Action Alleges

Coinbase Global Inc. is being sued by three customers who claim the exchange used facial-recognition technology to collect their biometric identifiers as part of its user-verification system without their consent, in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.

The plaintiffs, Scott Bernstein, Gina Greeder, and James Lonergan, are seeking to pursue claims on behalf of a class of Illinois residents. They are being represented by Labaton Keller Sucharow LLP and Wallace Miller.

The complaint, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that Coinbase used technology from third-party providers Jumio Corp. and Onfido in its facial-recognition system.

Coinbase didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys filed more than 10,000 individual demands for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association in March and April. This led to the appointment of a process arbitrator for the handling of preliminary matters.

Coinbase argued that the claimants should be required to proceed in small-claims court in Illinois and a predispute resolution process prior to arbitration, and to provide additional declarations and information.

The process arbitrator denied the company’s requests, and AAA determined in March 2025 that it would charge fees according to its published fee schedule.

After Coinbase refused to pay the filing fees, AAA closed the arbitrations, leaving the plaintiffs free to pursue their claims in court.

The plaintiffs are seeking liquidated damages of $1,000 per negligent BIPA violation and $5,000 per intentional or reckless violation; injunctive and equitable relief; attorneys’ fees and costs; and pre- and post-judgment interest.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jun 06, 2025