Can Bitcoin be 51% attacked?

A 51% attack on Bitcoin would require immense resources, making it highly impractical due to the network's massive hashrate and economic disincentives.

Aug 13, 2025 at 11:36 am

What is a 51% Attack in the Context of Bitcoin?

A 51% attack refers to a scenario in which a single entity or group gains control over more than half of the total hashrate of a blockchain network. In the context of Bitcoin, this means controlling over 50% of the computational power used to mine new blocks and validate transactions. The hashrate represents the total combined computational power dedicated to processing Bitcoin transactions and securing the network through proof-of-work. If an attacker surpasses this 50% threshold, they can manipulate the blockchain in specific ways, such as reversing transactions, preventing new transactions from being confirmed, or double-spending coins. However, they cannot create new bitcoins out of thin air or steal coins from addresses without access to private keys.

How Does a 51% Attack Work on Bitcoin?

When a miner or mining pool controls the majority of the network’s hashrate, they can begin to exploit the consensus mechanism. Here’s how such an attack could unfold:

• The attacker secretly mines a private version of the blockchain, creating a longer chain than the public one.
• While mining in private, they make legitimate transactions on the public chain—such as spending Bitcoin at an exchange.
• After receiving goods or converted funds, the attacker reveals their longer, privately mined chain.
• Due to Bitcoin’s consensus rule that the longest valid chain is accepted, nodes switch to the attacker’s version.
• The transactions on the public chain (including the exchange withdrawal) are effectively erased, allowing the attacker to double-spend their Bitcoin.

This process relies on the fundamental rule that the longest chain wins. However, executing this requires immense resources and coordination, making it extremely difficult on a large network like Bitcoin.

Why Is a 51% Attack on Bitcoin Extremely Difficult?

The Bitcoin network’s hashrate is astronomically high, currently exceeding 500 exahashes per second (EH/s). To achieve 51% control, an attacker would need to deploy computational power surpassing all other miners combined. This would require:

• Millions of the latest ASIC mining rigs, such as the Bitmain Antminer S19 series.
• Access to vast amounts of electricity, likely costing hundreds of millions of dollars per year.
• Physical infrastructure, including data centers, cooling systems, and maintenance teams.
• The ability to conceal such a large-scale operation from the public and other miners.

Moreover, the market would likely react swiftly. A sudden spike in hashrate could signal an attack, prompting exchanges and services to delay withdrawals or increase confirmation requirements. The economic cost of acquiring and operating such infrastructure far outweighs any potential gains from double-spending.

Has Bitcoin Ever Been 51% Attacked?

As of now, Bitcoin has never experienced a successful 51% attack. The network’s size, decentralization, and economic incentives make such an attack impractical. However, smaller cryptocurrencies using similar proof-of-work mechanisms—like Bitcoin Gold, Verge, and Ethereum Classic—have suffered 51% attacks. These networks have significantly lower hashrates, making them vulnerable to rental-based mining power from services like NiceHash. Attackers can temporarily rent enough hashing power to overpower the network, execute double-spends, and profit before disappearing.

Bitcoin’s economic security model deters such attacks. Miners invest heavily in hardware and electricity, aligning their interests with the network’s health. A successful attack would undermine confidence in Bitcoin, crashing its price and devaluing the attacker’s own holdings and mining equipment. This creates a strong disincentive.

What Would Happen If a 51% Attack on Bitcoin Succeeded?

Even if an attacker managed to execute a 51% attack, the damage would be limited:

• They could reverse recent transactions and perform double-spends, but only those confirmed during their controlled period.
• They could prevent new transactions from being confirmed, disrupting the network temporarily.
• They could not alter historical blocks beyond the immediate reorganization window without enormous additional effort.
• They could not forge new Bitcoin or access funds from wallets without private keys.

The Bitcoin community would likely respond by reorganizing the chain, blacklisting the attacker’s blocks, or even considering a consensus rule change to invalidate the malicious chain. Full nodes, exchanges, and miners could coordinate to restore the legitimate chain, minimizing long-term damage.

How Can Users Protect Themselves from 51% Attack Risks?

While the risk to Bitcoin itself is minimal, users should still follow best practices:

• Wait for multiple confirmations: Exchanges and merchants should require 6 or more confirmations before considering a transaction final. Each confirmation makes a reversal exponentially harder.
• Monitor hashrate fluctuations: Sudden drops or spikes in hashrate could indicate malicious activity. Tools like Blockchain.com or BTC.com provide real-time hashrate data.
• Use reputable services: Choose exchanges and wallets that implement robust security measures, including delayed withdrawals during suspected attacks.
• Run a full node: By running a Bitcoin Core full node, users independently verify transactions and are not reliant on third-party validators.

These steps enhance personal security and contribute to the network’s overall resilience.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a government launch a 51% attack on Bitcoin?

While theoretically possible, it would require a government to allocate vast resources—potentially billions of dollars—for hardware and electricity. The global nature of Bitcoin mining makes it difficult to centralize control. Any such attempt would likely be detected, triggering defensive responses from the community and potentially rendering the attack economically futile.

Does a 51% attack destroy Bitcoin?

No. A successful attack would not destroy Bitcoin. The network could recover through community coordination. Historical precedents in smaller blockchains show that networks can survive such events by reorganizing the chain and implementing countermeasures.

Can a 51% attack steal my Bitcoin?

No. A 51% attack cannot access private keys or steal funds directly from wallets. It can only reverse transactions that were confirmed while the attacker controlled the network. Your coins are safe as long as you control your private keys.

Are proof-of-stake networks immune to 51% attacks?

They face similar risks, though the mechanics differ. In proof-of-stake, an attacker would need to control 51% of the staked cryptocurrency. However, economic penalties (slashing) and identity requirements in many PoS systems make such attacks more costly and detectable.